New Human Fetal Cell Line Available for Vaccine Production

New Human Fetal Cell Line Available for Vaccine Production

human fetus surrounded by test tubes
“The tissues from the freshly aborted fetuses were immediately sent to the laboratory for the preparation of the cells.” — Bo Ma et al.

Since the 1960s, a number of vaccines have been manufactured using “human-diploid fibroblast cell cultures”—cells from tissue of aborted human fetuses.1 2 3 4 5 They include the following 11 vaccines listed on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary table:

  • Adenovirus
  • DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel)
  • DTaP-IPV (Quadracel)
  • Hep A (Havrix)
  • Hep A (Vaqta)
  • Hep A/Hep B (Twinrix)
  • MMR (MMR-II)
  • MMRV (ProQuad)
  • Rabies (Imovax)
  • Varicella (Varivax)
  • Zoster (Shingles – Zostavax).6 

The aborted human fetal cell cultures are used for growing viruses, which are then used in the preparation of inactivated and live virus vaccines. Viruses for vaccines are also grown on other kinds cultures such as chicken embryos or from cells from different animals and bugs, such as army worms, but, according to the National Network  for Immunization Information (NNii), “human cells are preferred because cells derived from animal organs sometimes may carry animal viruses that could harm people.”1 5 7 8 9 10

There are two specific human cell lines that are used in vaccine production. The first one is known as the Wistar Institute-38 or “WI-38”. The second is the Medical Research Council -5 or “MRC-5”.

The WI-38 cell line was developed in July 1962 from “lung tissue taken from a therapeutically aborted [female] fetus of about 3 months gestational age.” The MRC-5 cell line was developed September 1966 from “lung tissue taken from a 14 week [male] fetus aborted for psychiatric reason from a 27 year old physically healthy woman.”3 4 

According to Joseph Mercola, DO, WI-38 and MRC-5 are the two “primary cell cultures” that have been used to make hundreds of millions of doses of vaccines for more than half a century.10 However, there is now a third aborted human fetal cell culture that may be used. It is called Walvax-2, and it has been assessed as a culture for growing rabies, hepatitis, and Varicella viruses.11

A study published in the journal Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics in 2015 confirmed the development of Walvax-2 by China’s pharmaceutical industry. The source tissue for the cell line was obtained from nine fetuses through “rigorous screening based on carefully specified inclusion criteria.”11 

The study’s authors noted, “The tissues from the freshly aborted fetuses were immediately sent to the laboratory for the preparation of the cells.”

The Walvax-2 strain of cells met all of these criteria and proved to be the best cell line following careful evaluation. Therefore it was used for establishing a human diploid cell strain. Walvax-2 was derived from a fetal lung tissue, similar to WI-38 and MRC-5, and was obtained from a 3-month old female fetus aborted because of the presence of a uterine scar from a previous caesarean birth by a 27-year old healthy woman.11

The source tissue was provided by Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Yunnan Hospital in China.11 Relatively little additional information about Walvax-2 is available from public sources. It is not clear, for example, how the name was derived or what government agency or company is leading the research and the possible application of the cell line to vaccine production.

It is worth noting, though, that there is a major vaccine manufacturer called Walvax Biotechnology Co., Ltd. in the city of Kunming in the Chinese province of Yunnan. It is a private firm whose products include haemophilus influenza type b conjugate vaccines, meningococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccines, and blood products.12 13


References:

1 Vaccine Ingredients – Fetal Tissues. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Dec. 7, 2017.
2 What Are MRC-5 and WI-38? And Why Are They in Vaccines? Thinking Moms’ Revolution July 25, 2014.
3 AG05965-C, Fibroblast from Skin, Lung. Coriell Institute for Medical Research.

4 NA06814, DNA from Fibroblast. Coriell Institute for Medical Research.

5 
Human Cell Strains in Vaccine Development. The History of Vaccines.
6 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary. CDC.gov.
7 
Human Fetal Links with Some Vaccines. National Network  for Immunization Information June 3, 2008.
8 
Fisher BL. The Emerging Risks of Live Virus & Virus Vectored Vaccines: Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding & Transmission. National Vaccine Information Center 2014.
9 
Parpia R. Armyworms Used to Make Flublok Influenza Vaccine. The Vaccine Reaction Oct. 1, 2017.
10 
Mercola J. One of the Most Inexcusable Vaccine Revelations of All… Mercola.com July 10, 2011.
11 
Ma B, He LF, Zhang YL, Chen M, Wang LL, Yang HW, Yan T, Sun MX, Zheng CY. Characteristics and viral propagation properties of a new human diploid cell line, Walvax-2, and its suitability as a candidate cell substrate for vaccine production. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2015;11(4):998-1009.  
12 
Company Overview of Walvax Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Bloomberg.
13 
Walvax Biotechnology Co Ltd (300142.SZ). Reuters.

32 Responses to "New Human Fetal Cell Line Available for Vaccine Production"

  1. Suzie   January 11, 2018 at 9:12 pm

    In regards to the 4th paragraph…”The WI-38 cell line was developed in July 1962 from “lung tissue taken from a therapeutically aborted [female] fetus of about 3 months gestational age.” The MRC-5 cell line was developed September 1966 from “lung tissue taken from a 14 week [male] fetus aborted for psychiatric reason from a 27 year old physically healthy woman.”3 4

    My question is could there possibly be unknown implications on societies that are injected with the genetic materials of other humans, not limited to the scientifically known physical harms, but also including the possibility of mental harms from being injected with genetic materials derived from psychiatric patient’s discarded offspring, such as the MRC-5? It would explain a lot.

    Reply
  2. Nayo   January 11, 2018 at 9:14 pm

    Interesting that Walvax 2 was said to have been derived from 9 fetuses but yet the description of the cell line mentions only one dead baby. What about the abortion stories for all the other contributing fetuses? Would like more info on this, perhaps Cogforlife.com will run a feature on this. Thanks for your info

    Reply
  3. Mike   January 11, 2018 at 10:13 pm

    It was just a matter of time… but now they can’t use the argument that no new fetal cells have been harvested. And unless minds and hearts accept the truth of the evil of killing babies in the womb, there will inevitably be more fresh human unborn baby cells used for human medications, while science and medical professions will remain in denial as to why strange and new illnesses increase, along with increased occurrences of allergies, autism, and more.

    Reply
    • Julie   January 14, 2018 at 11:31 am

      Thank you for these links! I’m very much against vaccines anyway, and believe them to be dangerous for multiple reasons. But I had never yet heard that it is the “human fetal contaminants in the vaccines that are associated with autism”. This information must be really being suppressed!

      Reply
  4. Judy Fenton   January 11, 2018 at 10:44 pm

    It is wrong to use tissue from aborted babies. It’s very wrong to use this tissue’s cell lines to produce vaccines for babies, because there is residual human DNA in the actual vaccines. This human DNA can integrate into the baby’s own genome, causing mutations to the nervous system resulting in autism. Dr. Theresa Deisher of Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute in Seattle, WA has spent years researching this. She has found a clear correlation between use of the fetal DNA vaccines and autism. Please look at these two websites: http://www.soundchoice.org and http://www.verifyyourvaccines.com.

    Reply
  5. Angela   January 12, 2018 at 4:54 am

    Could the real reason for the abortion of the child listed for the Walvax 2 strain be China’s One Child Policy?

    Reply
  6. ingrid durden   January 12, 2018 at 8:04 am

    I am old enough to be born before mass vaccination. I had a few as a child, and again some when i immigrated. There are a bunch of new illnesses around we never heard of before mass vaccination, the enormous amount of pesticides and the messing with genetic materials. I have a feeling that humans are little by little destroying themselves in the name of progress.

    Reply
  7. xileen   January 12, 2018 at 10:19 am

    We should all be very leery of anything such as this being developed by China.

    In response to Judy Fenton’s comment, I’ve been wondering for years, what’s the difference between a 3 month old gestational “cell” and/or a 3 month old gestational “stem cell”?

    Also, has anyone considered blood types or gender.

    Thanks for the links, I’ll be sure to check them out.

    Reply
  8. Mo   January 12, 2018 at 12:10 pm

    Suzie…….bingo. There’s diet implications, environmental, air, water, toxins also, but, bingo. Look 3 comments above yours. putting someone elses DNA into your own body is a prescritption for disaster. We can all reverse what’s going on with our bodies with changing what’s on the end of our fork. Stop eating ourselves to death and vaccines wouldn’t be necessary! (they’re really not anyway and are what’s causing all this crap,,,,but.)

    Reply
  9. Suzy   January 12, 2018 at 6:04 pm

    I am amazed that the ‘religious right’ (and organized religion in general) has never made an issue of the fact that vaccines are grown on aborted human tissue. Surely they would dissuade their followers from accepting vaccines purely on religious grounds… or have they been persuaded to turn a blind eye?

    Reply
    • Gail Crandall   January 13, 2018 at 1:48 am

      Just because you haven’t heard our protests doesn’t mean they haven’t been there. The battle against abortion and the use of fetal tissue is enormous and ongoing. Do something to help.

      Reply
    • Mary Wancewicz   January 13, 2018 at 8:48 am

      Since Vatican 2, the Catholic church probably doesn’t care about these types of things as many so-called Catholic charities refer women to Planned Parenthood for abortions and as you have noticed really don’t do anything on the whole about abortion at all even for their church members. The real catholic church consists of the resistance who follow church teachings before Vatican 2 which is Masonic.

      Reply
      • carol   January 13, 2018 at 4:15 pm

        This is a bizarre comment. As a Catholic theologian, I am shocked at this statement. The church’s stance on abortion has always been clear: both before and after Vatican II. Masons are not Catholics! Masons are a movement of “stone-cutters” and in general do not adhere to any particular denominational beliefs.

        Reply
        • Mary   January 15, 2018 at 8:19 am

          vatican 2 was Masonic and yes they do have a religion. Some “theologian” you are.

          Reply
          • Diane   April 18, 2019 at 5:46 pm

            You have no idea what you are talking about. Where do you come up with such nonsense?

    • Debra   January 13, 2018 at 10:56 am

      The following website does extensive research on aborted fetal tissue used in vaccines:
      https://cogforlife.org
      I have learned a tremendous amount on this subject through their findings.

      Reply
    • carol   January 13, 2018 at 4:11 pm

      They have turned a blind eye.

      Reply
    • Pauline Leister   February 2, 2019 at 9:55 pm

      Vatican has given it’s ok.

      Reply
  10. Stacey   January 13, 2018 at 4:30 am

    The tissues were obtained from a live aborted fetus! “They further noted how they induced labor using a “water bag” abortion to shorten the delivery time and prevent the death of the fetus to ensure live intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.” http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/new-fetal-cell-line-from-live-abortion-emerges-for-vaccine-production/

    Reply
  11. Debra   January 13, 2018 at 10:59 am

    I have used the following website to learn more on the aborted fetal tissue used in vaccines:
    https://cogforlife.org
    It has a wealth of information on this topic and I would recommend it to anyone who has concerns on this subject.

    Reply
  12. elijah varga   January 19, 2018 at 12:46 am

    In the best interest of my grandchildren I happened to became interested in vaxx issues.To say the least I utterly shocked in this practice. I happened to talk to some Catholics about aborted baby tissues in vaxx preparation, even to some Moslems ,how they feel about this shocking inhuman practice and also of Moslems receiving pig and dog cultured vaxxes. To my shock, they all mute, like mules.Are they not just hypocrites,claiming something yet they have no answer to a simple question regarding their faith? I can only interpret this to myself of their cowardice,when asked about their belief.Yes,they are shit scares of repercussions.I admire these commenters regarding their stand on moral issues regardless of religious affiliations or beliefs.Are we counting ourselves humans with ethics and morals or just zombie-ing along and make sure not to rock the boat.

    Reply
  13. Kirsi   February 2, 2018 at 3:54 am

    Unfortunately, in addition to those cell lines, there are some more:
    Wistar RA 27/3, known also as RA 27/3
    IMR-90 and IMR-91
    HEK-293
    PER.C6

    Sources:

    ATCC in partnership with lgc standards: IMR-90 (ATCC® CCL-186™). http://www.lgcstandards-atcc.org.

    Botha Leslie Carol: Anti-Abortionists Should Protest Vaccinations Containing Aborted Fetal Cells. Holy Hormones Journal 21st Apr.2012.

    Children of God for Life: PER C6 & HEK-293. cogforlife.org.

    Coriell Institute for Medical Research, sells cell lines. You can find more information from their origin, when you write next codes in search area: https://catalog.coriell.org sekä http://ccr.coriell.org/Sections/Search/Sample.
    NA06814 DNA from Fibroblast
    AG06814-J Fibroblast from Skin, Lung
    AG05965-C Fibroblast from Skin, Lung
    Search results for – aborted fetus

    Coriell Institute: Cell Collections – A publication of the Coriell Cell Repositories 2003/2004. A Brief History of IMR-90. cogforlife.org

    Deisher Theresa A. et al.: Epidemiologic and Molecular Relationship Between Vaccine Manufacture and Autism Spectrum Disorder Prevalence. Issues Law Med. 2015 ;30(1):47-70. PMID: 26103708

    FDA/Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research: Vaccines and related biological products advisory committee. Meeting May 16, 2001. (page 91) http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/transcripts/3750t1_01.pdf

    FDA/ Vaccines, Blood & Biologics: Vaccines Licensed for Use in the US.

    Fogel Alice and Plotkin Stanley A.: Markers of Rubella Virus Strains in RK13 Cell Culture. J Virol. 1969 Feb; 3(2): 157–163. (page 157)

    Genzel Y.: Designing cell lines for viral vaccine production: Where do we stand? Biotechnol J. 2015 May;10(5):728-40. doi: 10.1002/biot.201400388.

    Hastings Becky: The schocking Truth about aborted human fetal cells in vaccines. journeyboost.com 27th March.2015.

    Hyler Kristian: Vaccines and Aborted Fetuses. Updated Jan 2015. www. silentvoices.org.

    Leiva, Rene M.D. “A Brief History of Human Diploid Cell Strains.” [Online] Wellness Center [Cited:Jan. 6, 2015]. pdfs.semanticscholar.org. Originally published in the National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 6.3 (Autumn 2006): pages 443-451 copyright 2006 by the National Catholic Bioethics Center.

    Children of God for Life. “Vaccines from Abortion: The Hidden Truth. Murfreesboro : s.n., September 2008. Pamphlet.

    Bionity. com, “HEK Cell” [Online] CHEMIE.DE Information Service GmbH copyright 1997-2015, [Cited:
    Jan. 10, 2015

    Ma Bo et al.: Characteristics and viral propagation properties of a new human diploid cell line, walvax-2, and its suitability as a candidate cell substrate for vaccine production. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015 Apr; 11(4): 998–1009. Published online 2015 Mar 24. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1009811

    Madsen Ragnhild: Cell lines from aborted human fetus in vaccineproduction. vaccinequestions.wordpress.com 8thApr.2012.

    Pau M.G. et al.: The human cell line PER.C6 provides a new manufacturing system for the production of influenza vaccines. ScienceDirect, Elsevier: Vaccine Volume 19, Issues 17–19, 21st March 2001, Pages 2716-2721

    Plotkin Stanley A. MD, et al.: Attenuation of RA 27/3 Rubella Virus in WI-38 Human Diploid Cells. Amer J Dis Child, Vol 118, Aug 1969. (cogforlife.org.)

    ProCon.org: Vaccine Ingredients and Manufacturer Information (alphabetical order by vaccine). 19th Sept.2016. vaccines.procon.org.

    Redondo Calderón José Luís: Vaccines, biotechnology and their connection with induced abortion. Cuad Bioet. 2008 May-Aug;19(66):321-53. PMID: 18611078.

    Wikipedia: HEK 293 cells.

    Reply
  14. Sandy Lunoe   February 17, 2018 at 11:58 am

    It is utterly disgraceful that aborted human fetal cell lines are used for vaccine production.

    Incredibly, there is a new “creative” production method which has been approved:

    For the first time the use of cells directly derived from human malignant human tumors has been officially approved as a method for vaccine production.

    http://vactruth.com/2014/11/30/vaccines-made-from-cancer-tumors/

    “Unbelievably, the method of producing vaccines using cells that are derived directly from human cancer tumors has been approved even though the vaccines may induce cancer in recipients. This method is cheaper and faster than breeding animals for the culture media – and human cancer tumors are readily available”.

    Reply
  15. Savannah   February 19, 2019 at 2:09 am

    The vatican’s okay doesn’t make it moral or ethical. Catholicism, in this case, is wrong.

    Reply
  16. Nancy RN   February 28, 2019 at 4:12 pm

    Using chemicals and hormones derived from animals and humans is not anything new. Diabetics have used insulin derived from pigs and then from humans for many years with only good results. Human albumin is not from abortion fetuses but from the blood plasma of donors.
    I am reading a lot of propaganda on this site from parents who are seemingly ready to risk the health and life of their children in order to uphold their pride and “rights”.
    In Madagascr last year ther were >1000 cases of measles and 72 measles related deaths per the World Health Organization. The only reason the measles rates are not that high in the US is due to very concerned and caring parents who have given their chilren 97% immunity to the dangerous disease through vaccinations.

    Reply
    • John R   March 11, 2019 at 8:01 am

      The issue or propaganda as you call it, is that babies were killed in order to create certain vaccines. The parents who are honest with themselves about this tainted medicine and have the fortitude to say no, are not proud.
      What about the “rights” of the babies who were killed?
      …pot calling kettle black Nancy

      Reply
  17. jim cummings   March 9, 2019 at 8:28 pm

    Nancy, This is not about pride. It’s actually about human sacrifice. To kill a child/fetus at any stage of life is an abortion. An abortion is the willful and deliberate taking of an innocent human life. It’s about following our Triune God with messages throughout the Church to protect human life from womb to tomb. Developing a vaccine but putting your soul in peril is the battle line. Satan typically wins though since we let our free will dictate Our choice, and not His choice. I am not trying to be hateful, but our abortion mills are lying to the public, and training boys and girls to have all the sex they want so their pockets will be filled with money. If I died tomorrow because I missed out on a vaccine that would extend my life, then fine… Heaven is a choice for following Christ, and turning your back puts you in touch with a much warmer climate. I would be happy to send you any or all of my books on this subject, and certainly youtube videos for the truth. Sometimes we confuse fact with truth. You know, the truth will set you free.

    Mary W (above) The Catholic Church does care about products used from an aborted fetus. There have been law suits with children being expelled because the parent wouldn’t allow a Vaxx. The Church does have Catholic Charities organizations around the planet, and many, if not the majority of employees are not Catholic. This means they may not be following the proper teachings of the Church, and not the organization. When these issues are exposed, change is made… Don’t confuse Vat II with anything other than trying to open the doors so wide, that no one has an excuse for not participating. God wants everyone to come to Himself. As a country and planet, we are going off the rails faster than a speeding train, so finding the hole in the dike to patch is overwhelming…
    Love you all. Encourage others while it’s still today…
    PAX
    Jim

    Reply
  18. Nancy RN   March 12, 2019 at 3:41 pm

    And what about the rights of infants born with congenital effects of these diseases to unvaccinated mothers?
    Measles, mumps, and rubella are three common childhood diseases, caused by measles virus, mumps virus (paramyxoviruses), and rubella virus (togavirus), respectively, that may be associated with serious complications and/or death. For example, pneumonia and encephalitis are caused by measles. Mumps is associated with aseptic meningitis, deafness and orchitis; and rubella during pregnancy may cause congenital rubella syndrome in the infants of infected mothers. The impact of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination on the natural history of each disease in the United States can be quantified by comparing the maximum number of measles, mumps, and rubella cases reported in a given year prior to vaccine use to the number of cases of each disease reported in 1995. For measles, 894,134 cases reported in 1941 compared to 288 cases reported in 1995 resulted in a 99.97% decrease in reported cases; for mumps, 152,209 cases reported in 1968 compared to 840 cases reported in 1995 resulted in a 99.45% decrease in reported cases; and for rubella, 57,686 cases reported in 1969 compared to 200 cases reported in 1995 resulted in a 99.65% decrease.{3}

    Reply
  19. Nancy RN   March 15, 2019 at 12:52 pm

    I don’t beleive in abortions either, but I do believe the health of the living is even more important.

    Reply
  20. DeeDee Stanke   June 22, 2019 at 10:27 pm

    I don’t know if you are aware you are blocked from Pinterest…and the censorship goes on…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.