Monday, December 04, 2023


“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”

— William Wilberforce

Twelve Infants Die During Clinical Trials for FDA-Endorsed RSV Drug

On June 8, 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee (AMDAC) voted unanimously (21-0) in favor of AstraZeneca and Sanofi’s new nirsevimab (Beyfortus) monoclonal antibody drug believed to provide protection for infants from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease and other lower respiratory tract infections during their first year of life.1

Citing a “favorable benefit-risk profile for the prevention of RSV lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) in newborns and infants born during or entering their first RSV season,” AstraZeneca/Sanofi stated in a press release that the antibody may also have the potential to protect those born healthy at term or preterm, as well as with conditions that make them more susceptible to RSV disease.2

RSV is a common, typically-mild lower respiratory illness. In serious cases, the disease can lead to pneumonia or bronchiolitis, putting infants and the elderly at high risk for complications.

The RSV antibody comes on the heels of the world’s first RSV vaccine, GSK’s Arexvy, which was approved by the FDA last month for use in people 60 years of age and older. Pending final FDA approval, nirsevimab would become the first single-dose pharmaceutical intervention in the U.S. aimed at protecting babies from RSV infections through age two years.3

RSV Labeled a Major Public Health Threat After Unprecedented Surge in Cases

After COVID infections decreased, there was an “unprecedented” spike in RSV infections in infants that overwhelmed hospitals in 2022 and prompted pediatric health organizations to call on President Biden to declare a public health emergency after 17 states reported that more than 80 percent of their beds were full last fall.4

While some experts suggest the surge in respiratory viruses is a result of relaxing COVID-19 measures, others attribute the spike to “immunity debt,” or the idea that people’s immune systems were weakened from lack of normal, natural exposure to pathogens like RSV and influenza because of stay-at-home orders, prolonged mask-wearing, and social distancing that persisted for the better part of three years.5

The path to pharmaceutical RSV protection spans several decades, with clinical trials for an RSV vaccine ending abruptly in the 1960s after the shot unexpectedly sickened and hospitalized 80 percent of children in the trial. The inactivated virus used in the shot exacerbated the disease once trial participants caught RSV naturally, leading to two children’s deaths and researchers going back to the drawing board.6

Today, more than 60 years later, 12 infants have died during clinical trials of the new nirsevimab, two from “unknown causes” thought to be linked to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).7

Infant Deaths Attributed to Underlying Disease Despite Clinical Trials Requiring Healthy Participants

The other 10 infant deaths were attributed to “underlying disease.” However, according to Pfizer, clinical trials typically include healthy participants to assess the safety of the drug and any side effects, and only certain types of trials—such as those for oncology—would warrant the inclusion of sick patients versus healthy people.7 8

Before joining a clinical trial, according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), participants must be given informed consent, as well as any information that allows the research team to determine whether or not they can participate in the study safely.9

As for the other 10 children’s deaths—attributed to a number of varying causes such as cardiac disease, a tumor, COVID, a skull fracture, pneumonia, two from gastroenteritis, and two from unknown causes—FDA official Melissa Baylor, MD said none of the deaths appeared to be related to the experimental drug nirsevimab.7

SIDS and the Importance of Black Box Warnings on Drugs

By definition, SIDS is an unexpected and unexplainable death that occurs in a “seemingly normal, healthy infant under one year of age.” In fact, nine out of 10 deaths in the study occurred around the two- and four-month mark, when well-baby visits to the pediatrician commonly precede the administration of multiple vaccines, such as the combined DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis) in one visit, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Immunization Schedule.10

Many drugs, including some routine childhood vaccinations for newborns, contain black box warnings on the manufacturer’s product inserts. A black box warning, the highest safety-related warning intended to alert the consumer to major risks of the drug, stamps the insert of any drug where trial participants died during clinical studies. Still, more often than not, as with the clinical trials of nirsevimab, the diagnosis of SIDS often overrules the occurrence of a potentially lethal drug reaction as the cause of death in an otherwise healthy infant.11

The FDA is slated to make a final decision on nirsevimab later this year. To date, the agency maintains it has not identified any safety concerns in its review of the drug.7

If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.

Click here to view References:

15 Responses

  1. How many infants were in this trial to begin with? How long after this trial shot did the infants die?

    1. And we’re the deaths evenly distributed between treated and placebo. Phizer and the FDA played all kinds of games to hide the fact that all cause mortality was noticably higher in the COVID Vaxx trial. And hid that after the trial they vaxxed the placebo group and a bunch of them died.

      1. You’re aware, I hope, that there’s no such thing as a placebo in vaccine trials. Vaccines are tested against either other vaccines or against adjuvants. Presumably this is because both of these will also cause side effects, making the trial vaccine appear to be less dangerous than it is.

  2. The slaughter continues.
    How any parent can allow their child to be genocided by the medical mafia is beyond me.

  3. Uhhhhhhh…………… How Much $$$$$$$ Were the Parents Paid by the Pharmaceutical Companies to let them EXPERIMENT on their Children I Wonder?????? And, for NO AMOUNT OF MONEY ………… Would I Ever Allow Anyone to Use an EXPERIMENTAL DRUG on my infant, child, or even teenager for that matter!!! Probably picked poor people who Really Need the Money, and said………… ” Ahh it’ll be fine, your baby wont feel a thing…………. and by the way………… Heres your $$$$$” Big Pharma…….. Preying on the Poor and the Innocent!!! God Help Them……….. Cause right now ………… Their Alllllll going to Hell!!!

  4. Oh no these babies deaths could NOT have come from the “shot”!
    Just like there were NO deaths from the covid (poison) shot!
    I can’t imagine anyone letting someone “experiment” on their child…any “child” through 60 years of age say…let alone any child under the age of 20!

  5. All these unneccessary deaths by experimential drugs. So sad! This is what happens when big pharma & govt. bodies collude together. Shame on them. Blood is on their hands!

  6. stop this idea that we were made deficient by nature and chemicals will save us … why would a baby need chemicals ……

  7. Shocking! Sickening and hard to read, but rea it we must! I can’t get my head around the fact that a parent, or parent might allow their baby/child to be used as a lab rat!!!! Or are these babies and children in state care? I’ve read many are. Or are they babies raised for lab rats? That wouldn’t surprise me in the least. Then what happened t oinformed concent? Can a little baby give informed concent? We all know the answer to that!!!! As for the corrupt FDA don’t even get me started!

  8. Speaking of parents allowing their children to be experimented on, this was OUR Experience: my friend, a young single woman, signed adoption papers as soon as her baby was born. The baby was immediately taken to a children’s teaching hospital in the same town and was started on experimental drugs for cystic fibrosis!! The reason we know this is because my friend changed her mind and she and I went to the hospital two days later to pick up the baby. The mom was asked if they could “just finish the experimental drugs” the baby was started on(!), and of course she said NO WAY!!!

  9. Just don’t forget that the FDA and CDC are owned by Big Pharma. This has been going on since 1992 when they were allowed to pay their salaries. They aren’t protecting us from dangerous drugs, they are kissing Big Pharma’s rear.
    Guess who made what we need to heal us GOD,
    I work in a hair salon, we were told about using UVA light bulbs when Covid first started, one doesn’t work much closer to people than we do, we never had 1 case of Covid come from our salon. All retail stores need to be using those bulbs, hospitals and nursing home also.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search in Archive