Over 3,000 “Health Impact Events” After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinations

Over 3,000 “Health Impact Events” After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinations

Between Dec. 11 and 18, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna pharmaceutical companies an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)1 to distribute COVID-19 vaccines using messenger RNA (mRNA) technology that to date has not been licensed for use in humans.2 3 4 5 Although the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) held two special Saturday meetings to create national vaccine use recommendations for the two vaccines,6 7 legally both vaccines remain experimental until they have been formally licensed by the FDA.8 As initial supplies of the vaccines roll out into the states and health care workers treating COVID-19 patients in hospitals and medical facilities are the first to be vaccinated, reports of vaccine reactions are emerging.9

On Dec. 19, 2020, at a special meeting of the ACIP,10 the CDC presented information released by the ACIP COVID-19 Vaccines Work Group “Anaphylaxis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Receipt.”11 According to the CDC, by Dec. 18 there had been six case reports of anaphylaxis following Pfizer/BioNTech vaccinations that met the Brighton Collaboration criteria for anaphylaxis, which is a potentially life threatening reaction that occurs when immune cells overreact to a substance that has entered the body and a hyper-inflammatory response is triggered involving sudden release of histamine and other chemicals that may cause:12 13

  • skin redness, hives, and itching;
  • swelling of the eyes, lips, tongue, throat, hands, feet;
  • trouble swallowing and breathing, wheezing;
  • diarrhea or vomiting;
  • abdominal or chest pain;
  • fast or irregular heartbeat;
  • dizziness, sudden drop in blood pressure;
  • headache;
  • confusion, vision and speech problems;
  • shock/loss of consciousness;
  • cardiac arrest;
  • death

Foods are the most common triggers for anaphylactic reactions, followed by drugs/biologicals, insect stings, and idiopathic anaphylaxis (anaphylaxis of unknown cause). A shot of epinephrine is the first-line immediate treatment for anaphylaxis.14

Vaccines are known to cause allergic and anaphylactic reactions within minutes to four hours of vaccination, but CDC officials have long considered vaccine-associated anaphylaxis to be rare, stating in a 2018 study that:

Vaccine-associated hypersensitivity reactions are not infrequent; however, serious acute-onset, presumably IgE–mediated or IgG and complement-mediated anaphylactic or serious delayed-onset T cell–mediated systemic reactions are considered extremely rare.

The CDC confirmed that one person, who had an anaphylactic reaction following administration of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, had a previous history of anaphylaxis after a rabies vaccination. The CDC said the reported cases of anaphylaxis are being reviewed by federal health officials.15

CDC Reports More Than 3,000 “Health Impact Events” After COVID-19 Shots

At the Dec. 19 ACIP meeting, a chart entitled “V-safe Active Surveillance for COVID-19 Vaccines” was presented indicating that between Dec. 14 and Dec. 18, there were 272,001 doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine administered and 3,150 “Health Impact Events” recorded, including 514 events in pregnant women after receipt of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. The chart gave no further details about the nature of the more than 3,000 Health Impact Events recorded by the CDC.16

The CDC’s definition of Health Impact Events is “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional.”

Great Britain First Reported Anaphylaxis Cases After COVID-19 Shots

Britain was the first country to vaccinate frontline health workers and the elderly with the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine beginning on Dec. 8. Within 24 hours, Reuters reported that there had been two cases anaphylaxis and one possible allergic reaction in health care workers receiving the first doses of the vaccine. Reportedly, both health care workers had a history of allergic reactions and carried an epi-pen. On Dec. 9, the chief executive of Britain’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) stated that, “any person with a history of anaphylaxis to a vaccine, medicine or food should not receive the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.”17

Alaska Health Care Workers Had Allergic Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccine

On Dec. 16, The New York Times reported that two health care workers in Alaska who got the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine suffered allergic reactions. One worker had a reaction serious enough to require hospitalization.18

A middle aged woman with no history of allergies experienced shortness of breath, elevated heart rate and a rash covering her face and torso within 10 minutes of receiving the vaccine. She was immediately treated with epinephrine and her reaction subsided but then re-emerged and she was given IV epinephrine and steroids, hospitalized in the intensive care unit for one night and spent a second night in the hospital further recovering. According to CNN, the allergic reactions experienced by the two Alaska health care workers after the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccinations were reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).19

History of Anaphylactic Reaction to Previous Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine Only Contraindication

The CDC states there is one contraindication to the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine: “Severe allergic reaction (e.g. anaphylaxis) to any component of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine listed in the prescribing information is a contraindication to vaccination.” However, there is one precaution:20

CDC considers a history of severe allergic reaction such as anaphylaxis to any vaccine or to any injectable therapy (e.g., intramuscular, intravenous or subcutaneous) as a precaution, but not a contraindication.

Currently, the government does not consider a history of severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, to foods, drugs, other vaccines or environmental substances to be a reason to not receive mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Dermal Fillers May Be Associated with Facial, Lip Swelling After Moderna COVID-19 Shots

On Dec. 17, there was a report published in Drug Discovery and Development, that “temporary facial swelling might be another mild side effect for [Moderna Covid-19] vaccine recipients who have had prior dermal fillers,” such as injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) used in certain plastic surgery procedures.

Reportedly, in Moderna’s Phase 3 trials, three people developed facial or lip swelling after receiving the vaccine and two of the patients had prior dermal fillers in their cheeks within six months before vaccination. The third patient had received dermal filler in the lip two days after receiving the vaccine and had reported similar swelling in the past after receiving a flu vaccine. Antihistamines and steroids were used to treat the patients.

FDA Recommends Watching for Bell’s Palsy After COVID-19 Vaccinations

On Dec. 15, CNBC reported that the FDA staff recommends monitoring people who get COVID-19 vaccines manufactured by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna for symptoms of Bell’s palsy, which involves inflammation and paralysis of the nerve that controls facial muscles.21 The recommendation came after clinical trial data for both vaccines was analyzed by FDA staff.

In trials of the Moderna vaccine involving about 30,000 participants, there were four reported cases of Bell’s palsy and three had received the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, while one received a placebo. In clinical trials of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine involving about 42,000 participants, there were four reported cases of Bell’s palsy and all had received the experimental vaccine while no cases of Bell’s palsy occurred in the placebo arm of the trial.

FDA staff said there wasn’t enough data from the trials to determine causation, but that there should be increased monitoring for cases of Bell’s palsy as the mRNA vaccines are given to millions of people.

Bell’s palsy can cause facial paralysis (usually one side of face) and drooling, pain around jaw and ear, increased sensitivity to sound, headache, loss of taste and changes in production of tears and saliva.22 It can develop after a viral infection and has been reported following influenza vaccination.23 24

According to Mayo Clinic, “For most people, Bell’s palsy is temporary. Symptoms usually start to improve within a few weeks, with complete recovery in about six months. A small number of people continue to have some Bell’s palsy symptoms for life. Rarely, Bell’s palsy can recur.”25

Frequently Reported mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Reactions

Both the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines require two doses given three to four weeks apart. The CDC states that most common side effects of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are injection site redness and pain, fever, chills, fatigue (tiredness) and headache.

The CDC warns that, “these side effects may feel like the flu and may even affect your ability to do daily activities, but they should go away in a few days,” and instructs people to “get the second shot even if you have side effects after the first one, unless a vaccination provider or your doctor tells you not to get a second shot.”26

Vaccine Companies, Providers Shielded from Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries and Deaths

The vaccine manufacturers, doctors and all COVID-19 vaccine providers are completely shielded from civil liability for vaccine injuries and deaths that occur in the U.S. after COVID-19 vaccinations under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act passed by Congress in 2005.27 The Act gives a liability shield to the manufacturer of any vaccine or drug developed in response to a health emergency like a pandemic causes when a vaccine or drug causes the death or permanent injury of an individual who receives it during pre-licensure clinical trials or after it is released for public use.

Individuals who die or suffer serious harm directly caused by the administration of covered countermeasures, such as vaccines, may be eligible to receive compensation through the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program operated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,28 whether or not the harm was a result of willful misconduct on the part of the vaccine manufacturer or person administering the vaccine.


Click here to view References:

1 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). Dec. 18, 2020.
2 FDA. FDA Takes Key Action in Fight Against COVID-19 By Issuing An Emergency Use Authorization for First COVID-19 Vaccine. FDA Press Release Dec. 11, 2020.
3 FDA. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Dec. 11, 2020.
4 FDA. FDA Takes Additional Action in Fight Against COVID-19 by Issuing an Emergency Use Authorization for Second COVID-19 Vaccine. FDA Press Release Dec. 17, 2020.
5 FDA. Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine. Dec. 18, 2020.
6 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Considerations for Use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Dec. 14, 2020.
7 Schnirring L. CDC advisors recommend Moderna COVID vaccination. Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy Dec. 19, 2020.
8 Chandrasekhar R. Emergency Use Authorizations: What is an EUA, and Does Your Product Qualify? Carmargo Mar. 26, 2020.
9 CDC. Interim Considerations: Preparing for the Potential Management of Anaphylaxis at COVID-19 Vaccination Sites. Dec. 16, 2020.
10 Moderna, Inc. U.S. CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Recommends vaccination with Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine for Persons 18 Years and Older. Businesswire Dec. 19, 2020.
11 Clark T. Anaphylaxis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Receipt. COVID-19 Vaccines Work Group of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). CDC Dec. 19, 2020.
12 Balentine JK. Severe Allergic Reaction (Anaphylactic Shock). EMedicine Health Aug. 20, 2020.
13 Story CM. What Is Anaphylaxis? Healthline Nov. 18, 2017.
14 Lieberman PL. Recognition and first-line treatment of anaphylaxis. Am J Med 2014; 127 (Suppl 1).
15 Clark T. Anaphylaxis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Receipt. COVID-19 Vaccines Work Group of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). CDC Dec. 19, 2020.
16 Ibid.
17 Smout A. UK Issues anaphylaxis warning on Pfizer vaccine after adverse reactions. Reuters Dec. 9, 2020.
18 Welland N, LaFraniere S, et al. Alaska Health Workers Got Emergency Treatment After Receiving Pfizer’s Vaccine. The New York Times Dec. 16, 2020
19 Howard J, Langmaid V, Hanna J. Pfizer Covid vaccine: 2 Alaska health care workers suffer reactions to vaccine. CNN Dec. 17, 2020.
20 CDC. Interim Considerations: Preparing for the Potential Management of Anaphylaxis at COVID-19 Vaccination Sites. Dec. 16, 2020.
21 Higgins-Dunn N. FDA staff recommends watching for Bell’s palsy in Moderna and Pfizer vaccine recipients. CNBC Dec. 15, 2020.
22 Mayo Clinic. Bell’s palsy. Apr. 2, 2020.
23 Mutsch M, Zhou W et al. Use of the intranasal Influenza Vaccine and the Risk of Bell’s Palsy in Switzerland. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 896-903.
24 Zhou W, Pool V et al. A potential signal of Bell’s palsy after parenteral inactivated influenza vaccines: reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) – United States, 1991-2001. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2004; 13(8): 505-510.
25 Mayo Clinic. Bell’s palsy. Apr. 2, 2020.
26 CDC. What to Expect after Getting a COVID-19 Vaccine. Dec. 13, 2020.
27 Fisher BL, Parpia R. 2005 PREP Act and 1986 Act Shield Vaccine Manufacturers from Liability. The Vaccine Reaction Aug. 10, 2020.
28 Public Health Emergency. Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act. June 9, 2020.

29 Responses to "Over 3,000 “Health Impact Events” After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinations"

  1. Rancid   December 22, 2020 at 10:39 am

    Go to http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf for details. You will see that more than 540 expecting mothers have been vaccinated (way to kill two birds with one “shot”).

    Reply
    • Martha   December 23, 2020 at 11:14 pm

      That link no longer works. Do you have a copy of that PDF, please?

      Reply
      • Lisa Fulton   January 3, 2021 at 9:39 pm

        You can go to the cdc website, and find where adverse reactions are reported and pull a report. It is a little challenging to get the data. Interestingly, an elderly man died of a heart attack 2 hours after receiving the vaccine. It is recorded in the data, but not publicized as a recorded adverse reaction. I was appalled by what I found and is not being told to the American public to make an informed decision.

        Reply
  2. Nancy Woodruff   December 22, 2020 at 10:51 am

    Thank you for this timely, thorough and balanced report of the facts. NVIC does amazing work. You make a difference under difficult circumstances.

    Reply
  3. Nathalie   December 22, 2020 at 11:07 am

    the reasons for nor getting these experimental vaccines (or any other) are mounting. It is just very sad, not to say irresponsible for all those pushing the vaccines, that many people will suffer (short and long term) before we can put a stop to this madness (and not just for this vaccine but for all others already in use and to come). This makes you want to isolate yourself on a island somewhere.

    Reply
  4. Robert   December 22, 2020 at 11:16 am

    And yet we still can’t sue them!!!!

    Reply
  5. Mark R   December 22, 2020 at 12:22 pm

    Anyone who takes this vaccine is simply out-of-their-mind. A vaccine that has NEVER been properly tested/vetted, never been created until now, a mRNA vaccine having to be kept at -100F. If you cannot see the insanity in this, well go for it but do not expect empathy from many who have researched this new vaccine and realize how dangerous it is.

    It is an attempt to destroy humanity and if you haven’t figured that out, good luck.

    Reply
  6. Tom   December 22, 2020 at 1:29 pm

    All this for a vaccine that WILL not keep you from getting severely sick or dying from Covid? It was not tested to accomplish this. And just because the FDA no longer considers this an experimental vaccine it is safe to take? And with absolutely no proof of what might happen to your immune system over several injections or over many years? Even at age 70, with no vaccines in the last 40 years will I EVER get this shot. It won’t stop me from dying of Covid. I thought that is the purpose of all the lockdowns, isolations, masks, distancing and all the rest of the pretend actions…to save lives…even one life. Good grief.

    Reply
    • Timmy Jo Given   February 14, 2021 at 10:04 pm

      It is STILL considered experimental, or “investigational” as the FDA labels it. That is why it had to apply for Emergency Use Authorization; otherwise, it could have taken longer with testing on the clinical subjects. Unfortunately, the Phase III trials have now been rolled out to the public, who are the trial participants now. The end point of the trial is the year 2023. Scary.

      Reply
  7. Leah   December 22, 2020 at 1:42 pm

    Reference 16 referring to the slide in the CDC deck “V-safe active surveillance” seems to reference that of the 272,001 vaccinated, 122,807 are registered. I’m assuming that this means not everyone who has been vaccinated has been registered for surveillance. And, if those who are registered, 3,150 have had Health Impact Events. It does not appear from the slide that there were 514 Health Impact Events in pregnant women, but rather that there were 514 pregnant women who were registered. This article states implies that all 272,001 were tracked at that 514 pregnant women had Health Impact Events. Can this be clarified?

    Reply
  8. Moira Miraziz   December 22, 2020 at 2:14 pm

    My father died after getting the flu vaccine. Only time I had flu was after getting the flu vaccine. Vaccine reactions can be life threatening.

    Reply
  9. Brian James   December 22, 2020 at 2:40 pm

    Dec 20, 2020 CDC Issues New Guidelines, Launches Probe After 1000s Negatively-Affected By Covid Vaccination

    Thousands of people have been unable to work or perform daily activities, or required care from a healthcare professional, after getting the new COVID-19 vaccine, according to new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

    https://youtu.be/XzkdzJIEkMM

    Reply
  10. Kimberly   December 22, 2020 at 3:01 pm

    The CDC instructs people to “get the second shot even if you have side effects after the first one, unless a vaccination provider or your doctor tells you not to get a second shot.”26

    That says it all…

    Reply
  11. Stephen Billiter   December 22, 2020 at 3:09 pm

    Wow, it’s already getting worse as I knew it would, because no vaccine is safe and effective as the lie goes. First of all, the pandemic is a scam it’s not even a real event, or even an epidemic–Covd-`19 was created by US scientists in a lab and has a patent on it–it’s never been isolated and replicated in others.

    Pathologists in eastern Europe who are not scared of anyone, like the criminal WHO, have said that no vaccine can be created against SARS-COV-2, which is really no worse than the common cold:

    “Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.”

    “He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.”
    https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/02/no-one-has-died-from-the-coronavirus-president-of-the-bulgarian-pathology-association/

    Because this info is the opposite of what we’re told in the US–it must be true

    Reply
  12. Anna Watson   December 22, 2020 at 3:41 pm

    Im trying to find out what ‘health outcomes’ exactly were experienced.
    It doesn’t make sense to me that Level 1 and 2 are described as ‘unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional’ yet are not usually considered severe. Would these be headaches and flu like illnesses?
    From the SAEs bullet points published above can anyone confirm if this is from the Covid vaccine or is it a generic list and where would I find a break down please?
    Any help much appreciated
    PS Looks like anaphylaxis after this vaccine is nearly 20 times more than normally accepted as around 1 in a million. Is my math correct?

    Reply
  13. M3gaW0lf   December 22, 2020 at 3:53 pm

    Your article fails to mention the PEG issue at all (which has even been admitted by the MSM from various “official health sources”): https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/RFK_Jr_Letter_toFDA-_CBER-9-25-20.pdf . Relative to that is the fact that you should have mentioned that people contemplating getting the vaccine should have a “PEG antibody” blood test done PRIOR to receiving the vaccine. Nor do you point out the fact that the CICP pays ONLY what your insurance doesn’t cover (if your claim is approved at all) up to a maximum of ONLY $250,000. Other than that- good article!

    Reply
  14. Kate Jenkins   December 22, 2020 at 5:46 pm

    The Hippocratic Oath states….”First DO NO HARM”.

    Reply
  15. lola   December 22, 2020 at 6:46 pm

    How about the fact that it seems misleading to say the only way to stop the pandemic is by vaccinating; when CDC and even the manufacturers warn us that the viral spread after exposure to natural Covid in vaccinated has not been studied and that it is very likely that the vaccinated are asymptomatic spreaders.

    The truth remains that Covid vaccine offers immunity to the vaccinated by “supposedly” lessening individual symptoms; It does not stop spread of the virus. Individuals may choose natural immunity after weighing the risk/ benefit of vaccine. Vaccinated or not, one can still spread Covid, and Natural immunity is considered Immunity just as vaccine immunity is ( no trial has been done to prove that Covid is unlike any other existing diseases, in that it’s natural immunity is less superior than vaccine induced immunity). Re infection rate is extremely minimal and rare among individuals previously infected. In fact that is about the same, if not lower, than the baseline level of 95% vaccine efficacy.

    Just like memory response can be produced from vaccination, natural immunity has that capability as well, regardless of titer measures ( given a documented positive titer was noted after infection). In about 5 percent of the population Antibodies never develop , whether it is vaccination or natural disease. Even for measles, it is like that. ( lets just remember that so far there is trial to prove vaccinated do not spread covid)

    secondly, how about the fact that the trial consent form for Moderna and J and J stated that “disease enhancement can not be ruled out if people get exposed to natural Covid, after vaccination. Apparently disease enhancement was a problem with previous SARS infection, therefore the consent form informed volunteers that it could be a possibility as well with this Novel SARS Covid Virus. Meaning that once a person becomes exposed to real Covid virus after vaccine, it is a possibility that they can have a worse case of Covid due to primed immune response to the spike protein. Is that why we are suppose to wear masks until Covid dies out naturally any way with or without the vaccine? Are we worried that we may in fact have worse case of Covid after vaccination, especially since the vaccine is not documented to stop the spread of the virus?

    lastly, asides from Bells Palsy , they are also watching to see if younger recipient may be at a higher risk of developing Multi inflammatory syndrome.
    Having said all of that, why is there a blanket 2 dose immunization policy. The booster is the already the existing circulating natural Covid virus. Someone that has recovered just fine from Covid with antibody titers to prove it, should get 2 dose of vaccine just as an 90 year old with lower immune response and high co morbidity and no previous exposure?

    Reply
  16. Just a Californian for choice   December 22, 2020 at 7:06 pm

    It’s likely the PEG component of the lipid carrier causing these extreme allergic reactions. There are no adjuvants in the mRNA vaccines, the lipid liposomal carriers are enough to attentuate the immune response and PEG has been implicated as the troublemaker. I do have concerns there will be autoimmune consequences of these new vaccines. However my own dread about “Long Covid” led me to get the first Pfizer vaccine yesterday. This is all a dance, sometimes it feels like a dance with death, but none-the-less we do our best. Best wishes to all in protecting themselves and their families as their conscience directs; i.e. Vaccine CHOICE.

    Reply
  17. Jen   December 22, 2020 at 8:48 pm

    Is the CDC chart a daily total or running total? Your article compares total doses administered over a 4 day period (200K+) with just a 1 day total of adverse reactions! The total number of Health impact events over the 4 day period is 5052 and 937 events in pregnant. (The total health impact events of 3150 and 514 reflects a 1 day total when 112,807 doses were performed.)

    Dec 14 Dec 15 Dec 16 Dec 17 Dec 18*
    Registrants with recorded 1st dose 679 6,090 27,823 67,963 112,807
    Health Impact Events** 3 50 373 1,476 3,150
    Pregnancies at time of vaccination 5 29 103 286 514

    (copied from cdc.gov)

    Reply
  18. JennyM   December 22, 2020 at 9:03 pm

    Allergic reaction to the poison shot is the most obvious side effect but it’s just one of many that can happen. Just wait until people’s fertility is affected, but by that time it’ll be too late. My dad got Bell’s Palsy from a shingles shot.

    Reply
  19. Isabel M Valdes   December 22, 2020 at 9:15 pm

    Great information!
    To stay informed, support and become a member of
    NVIC is an independent, charitable non-profit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1982. NVIC does not accept donations or grants from pharmaceutical corporations, medical trade groups, government agencies, or foundations marketing vaccine products or promoting mandated use of vaccines.
    Contact Us
    National Vaccine Information Center
    21525 Ridgetop Circle, Ste 100,
    Sterling, VA 20166
    703-938-0342

    Reply
  20. Harry Madray   December 23, 2020 at 8:32 pm

    The public needs to know the absolute Truth about these Covid 19 Vaccines! Why should anyone take this Vaccine if he or she can still get infected by the virus? Then what is the purpose of the vaccine? The fact that we still have to wear Face Masks, and take all these precautions, even after having taken the vaccine, I find ridiculous! I am an 82 and a half year old man. I have a smart, intelligent 8 and a half year old attending Public school. We are bombarded with so much information, that one has no idea what to believe or not. Of course, I am deeply concerned about our health, should we take this vaccine. I would like to be around for another 10 years or more in sound mind to see our daughter graduate from University! Whether that is a possibility or not, God Alone knows. Because of past records of greed from the Pharmaceutical Industries and lies by the FDA, including the WHO and CDC, we, the public are at a loss as to what steps to take to protect ourselves and our loved ones! God help us all!!

    Reply
  21. Joy Eriksen   December 23, 2020 at 8:50 pm

    My question is this. Since this is an experimental medical procedure and people are being forced to take it for their work, or not being informed about the effects of it, is that not a violation of the Nuremberg Code?

    Reply
  22. Hannelore   December 25, 2020 at 4:08 am

    Is a universal class action, court case possible against those who take away personal freedom?

    Reply
  23. Tim Lundeen   December 25, 2020 at 4:12 pm

    Prevention is much superior to vaccination. You save just as many lives, with no adverse effects, and no risks from unknown long-term issues with the vaccines.

    https://www.patrickholford.com/advice/covid-news-xmas-special

    Reply
  24. Jan Becker   December 26, 2020 at 6:20 pm

    Everyone in the informed consent community must start correcting “science” writers, virologists/microbiologists, government “health” officials, and self-appointed experts on the language used with respect to these novel medical ‘countermeasures’ (NMCs).

    These mRNA injections have nothing in common with any vaccines approved up until now, since their mechanisms of “effectiveness” do not rely on innate immune responses to live/attenuated/dead viral components, but instead override the amazing human immune system entirely by forcing the body to actively produce a pathogenic antigen (to which the body may already have cross-reactive T cell immunity) in order to force the production of antibodies. I’m guessing that antibody production has been the gold standard of vaccine ‘effectiveness’ all these years ONLY because it is much easier to prove, not because it is the best kind of immunity. By ignoring both cross-reactive T cell immunity and the ACE2 receptor issue (which has been known for decades with respect to coronaviruses), the proponents are in effect telling everyone to do something that is very likely to result in auto-immune disease by anyone’s definition.

    Interestingly enough, the term ‘medical countermeasures’ is used in conjunction with the word ‘vaccines’ throughout the PREP Act (bureaucrates always cover their asses). We must insist that these NMCs be treated as an unproven technology, rather than as “biologics,” the characterization enjoyed by vaccines up until now, which has allowed them to be greenlighted by the FDA with little study or concern for safety.

    Second, let’s start calling out the words “immunization” and “inoculation.” These words imply some kind of protection from getting a disease. But the woefully inadequate “studies” performed on these NMCs were not even designed to discover whether or not they provide protection from getting the disease or prevent its spread by sick or asymptomatic carriers. The only “I” word that may be properly used here is simply “injection.”

    Reply
  25. Virginia   December 28, 2020 at 12:25 am

    By no stretch of the imagination will this be a vaccine: it will not prevent spread. It will turn recipients into super spreaders, but the non-jabbed will be blamed.

    Australian action: https://www.advocateme.com.au/national-class-action

    and

    https://concernedlawyersnetwork.net/

    We need more law firms to stand up and fight for justice.

    I encourage everyone to put together some credible sources and start sending them to the heads of large organisations, places that will be attempting to deny entry without proof of jab. Wake them up. Make them aware that by mandating the jab, they may face potential litigation. Put flyers in public places. Educate the sleepers!

    Reply
  26. Peggy   January 21, 2021 at 1:52 am

    I totally agree with Tom Lundeen that “prevention is much superior to vaccinations.”
    I am of the opinion that it would save many many people’s lives if the powers- that- be would consider that prophylactics (Ivermectin, Zinc and Doxyclycline) be used until such time as the vaccines are thoroughly researched and stringently tested for safety before it is offered to the public. And it should be voluntary not mandatory. And employers should not be permitted to insist that their employees have the vaccination (possibly against their better judgement) or no job, same goes for the airlines.
    To-date there have been many many positive studies on Ivermectin, both in USA and Australia (Professor Thomas Borody, Sydney) and Dr Zelenko (USA), and the list is increasing every day. Goodness, how many successful studies need to be done to convince these non medical professionals/bureaucrats, who are so busy hurrying the untested vaccine onto us, that it is better for people’s health to use a prophylactic (whilst waiting for a properly tested vaccine however long it takes) than to push these untested vaccine onto people, who then must suffer the consequences – there have been quite a few around the world – and consider this !! the vaccine makers are exonerated (before any event) should there be severe reactions/or death – they are on a win-win situation but the taxpayer isn’t – first he (the Govt that is us the taxpayers) has to pay for the vaccine and then if there are class actions against the vaccine manufacturers, he (that’s us again)then has to foot that bill for the damaged people.
    I believe it is most unwise to have the vaccine and if need be I would much rather rely on the proven prophylactic Ivermectin (which has been used nearly all over the world to deal with malaria, intestinal worms and lupus for over 40 years by billions of people without ill effect. In fact it is cited as being one of the safest medications. In fact in India, it is handed out over the counter without prescription to deal with Covid 19. Smart Indian Govt. It will save them millions if not billions of dollars to protect their people.

    There are huge numbers of people who are of the opinion that the untested vaccine is being thrust onto people rather than using the safe and tested prophylactic because the vaccine will generate millions probably billions of profit for Big pHARMa) and associates.

    Virginia you are right – yes, people need to wake up before consequences are forced onto them. WA for instance the police can come in knock down your door if need be, sit on you and have you forcibly injected. Check it out for yourselves. The WA Health ACT 185. And I believe (I hope that I am wrong) Victoria is heading on that path too. I used to think that politicians were elected by the people to represent the people NOT to dictate to them.
    As Virginia rightly says wake up! Quickly!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.