Wednesday, May 22, 2024


“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”

— William Wilberforce


2005 PREP Act and 1986 Act Shield Vaccine Manufacturers from Liability

Story Highlights

  • Most countries that have supply contracts with AstraZeneca have granted the drug company liability protection for their COVID-19 vaccine.
  • In the U.S., vaccine manufacturers and administrators are shielded from liability under the PREP Act of 2005 for a vaccine or drug that is developed in response to a declared public health emergency, including the Jan. 31, 2020 COVID-19 pandemic emergency declaration.
  • Vaccine manufacturers and administrators are also shielded from liability for vaccine injuries and deaths under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.

In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States and other countries around the globe have opened the door for accelerated development, testing and fast track licensure of experimental COVID-19 vaccines. The question many people have is: who will assume product liability when COVID-19 vaccines cause harm to an individual who has been vaccinated?

AstraZeneca Exempted from Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries & Deaths

AstraZeneca plc, a multinational pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Cambridge, England, has been granted product liability protection for the COVID-19 vaccine the company is developing by most countries with which it has made vaccine supply agreements.1 Liability questions have been a central issue in negotiations between AstraZeneca and countries seeking COVID-19 vaccine supply contracts.2

According to a member of AstraZeneca’s senior executive team, Ruud Dober:

This is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in four years the vaccine is showing side effects. … In the contracts we have in place, we are asking for indemnification. For most countries it is acceptable to take that risk on their shoulders because it is in their national interest.3

AstraZeneca and Emergent BioSolutions have struck an $87 million deal to manufacture two billion doses of the University of Oxford’s adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccine to supply to the U.S. The manufacturing contract is part of the Operation Warp Speed initiative to develop and rapidly increase production of COVID-19 vaccines before the end of 2020 to make them quickly available to the U.S. population.4

U.S. Congress Shielded Vaccine Makers from Liability for Pandemic Vaccines in 2005

In the U.S., vaccine manufacturers are shielded from liability under the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act if a vaccine or drug developed in response to a health emergency like a pandemic causes the death or permanent injury of an individual who receives it during pre-licensure clinical trials or after it is released for public use.5 6 The PREP Act was part of a series of “Bioshield” laws created in response to national security fears after 9/11 and subsequent reported weaponized microbe threats, which prompted Congress to encourage pharmaceutical companies to develop anti-bioterrorism vaccines by, in part, eliminating liability for injuries and deaths caused by those vaccines.7

After passing the PREP Act in 2005, the next year Congress passed the Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act. That law funded the creation of a public-private business partnership between the federal government and pharmaceutical companies that allowed HHS to provide federal money to drug companies for research and development of new bioterrorism and pandemic vaccines.8

The 2006 Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act also amended the Public Health Service Act to require the Secretary of HHS to lead all federal public health and medical responses to public health emergencies.

HHS Invokes the PREP Act Liability Shield for COVID-19 Vaccines and Drugs

The Secretary of HHS invoked the PREP Act following the Jan. 31, 2020 declaration of a COVID-19 pandemic public health emergency, stating that vaccines and drugs developed to respond to the coronavirus pandemic were covered countermeasures under the 2005 PREP Act.9 The PREP Act authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to provide liability immunity to “certain individuals and entities against any claim of loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the manufacture, distribution, administration, or use of medical countermeasures, except for claims involving “willful misconduct” as defined in the PREP Act.10 11

Under the 2020 coronavirus pandemic public health emergency declaration, “covered persons”—which includes vaccine administrators and manufacturers—are generally immune from legal liability (i.e., they cannot be sued for money damages in civil court) for harm or losses relating to the administration or use of “covered countermeasures” (COVID-19 vaccines and drugs) before or after licensure. The sole exception to immunity from civil liability under the PREP Act is for death or serious physical injury caused by “willful misconduct,” such as evidence of criminal fraud or gross negligence on the part of a company manufacturing the vaccine or a person who administered the vaccine.

HRSA-Managed Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP)

Individuals who die or suffer serious harm directly caused by the administration of covered countermeasures, such as vaccines, may be eligible to receive compensation through the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program,12 whether or not the harm was a result of willful misconduct on the part of the vaccine manufacturer or person administering the vaccine.

HHS has interpreted federal and state law to include tort and contract law, as well as claims for loss relating to compliance with local, state, or federal laws, regulations or other legal requirements. The definition of “loss” under the Act is broad, encompassing both physical and emotional injuries. Although the PREP Act does provide immunity to the pharmaceutical industry from COVID-19 vaccine injury lawsuits, vaccine manufacturers are not immune from injunctive relief or enforcement actions by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or other federal agencies.13

The CICP is administered by employees in HHS’s Health Resources and Services Administration. HRSA is the same agency responsible for administering the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) created by Congress in 1986 under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which partially shielded vaccine manufacturers from liability for injuries and deaths caused by FDA licensed vaccines that are recommended by the CDC for children and mandated by states for school entry.14 The 1986 Act was later amended to eliminate civil liability from doctors and other vaccine administrators and, in 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court eliminated remaining liability from vaccine manufacturers for defectively designed vaccines.15

HHS regulations govern CICP’s procedures and eligibility determinations. In general, eligible individuals (or their survivors) who suffer death or serious physical injury directly caused by the administration of a covered countermeasure may receive reimbursement for reasonable medical expenses, loss of employment income and survivor benefits in the case of death. Serious physical injuries under CICP are generally limited to those that warrant hospitalization or result in a significant loss of function or disability. Congress funds CICP awards through emergency appropriations to the Covered Countermeasure Process Fund.16

ACIP Recommendations Will Affect Which Compensation Mechanism Applies to COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries and Deaths

Under HRSA’s management, the CICP and the national Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) are separate programs. CICP applies to countermeasures (vaccines and drugs) covered by a PREP Act declaration of a public health emergency, such as those issued for the H1N1 “swine flu” influenza pandemic in 2009 and for the Ebola virus outbreak in 2016,17 while the VICP applies to vaccines recommended by the CDC for children and, as of 2016 under the 21st Century Cures Act, vaccines recommended for pregnant women.18

However, if the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) eventually votes to recommend COVID-19 vaccines for children and pregnant women, then it is likely that the VICP will be the primary compensation mechanism used in the U.S. to compensate individuals harmed by COVID-19 vaccines after they are licensed by the FDA.19 The government’s administration of the VICP has long been criticized by families with vaccine injured children for violating the spirit and intent of the 1986 Act, which Congress promised parents in congressional hearings would provide a non-adversarial, expedited, fair and just administrative alternative to a costly, lengthy and emotionally traumatic product liability or malpractice lawsuit in civil court.20 21

Weakening amendments passed by Congress and a series of rule-making changes by HHS and Department of Justice since 1986 have led to a routine denial of two out of three vaccine injury claims, and families often have to wait for years for claims to be adjudicated in the increasingly adversarial U.S. Court of Federal Claims.22 23 Recently, HHS has moved to deny even more awards by eliminating two vaccine injuries—syncope and brachial neuritis—from the Vaccine Injury Table,24 making it more difficult for claimants to receive compensation, which may well affect the number of claims paid for COVID-19 vaccine injuries.


1 Burger L, Aripaka P. AstraZeneca to be exempt from coronavirus vaccine liability claims in most countries. Reuters July 30, 2020.
2 Ibid.
3 Ibid.
4 Blankenship K. AstraZeneca, Emergent BioSolutions sign $87M deal to produce U.S. supply of COVID-19 vaccine. Fierce Pharma June 11, 2020.
5 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 2005 (PREP Act). PREP Act Q&A.
6 Garde D, Branswell H. 6 burning questions Congress could push Covid-19 vaccine makers to answer today. Stat News July 20, 2020.
7 Fisher BL. US Marines and Navy Prepare to Execute Pandemic Plan As Questions Resurface About Coronavirus Origin: After 9/11 Congress Gave More Power to Executive Branch. The Vaccine Reaction Feb. 20, 2020.
8 U.S. Congress. Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act of 2006. (PL109-417).
9 Congressional Research Service. The PREP Act and COVID-19: Limiting Liability for Medical Countermeasures. June 19, 2020.
10 Federal Register. Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19. Mar. 17, 2020.
11 Public Health Emergency. Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act. June 9, 2020.
12  Ibid.
13 Ibid.
14 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
15 National Vaccine Information Center. NVIC Cites ‘Betrayal’ of U.S. Supreme Court Giving Total Liability Shield to Big Pharma. Businesswire Feb. 23, 2011.
16 See Footnote 11.
17 Ibid.
18 National Vaccine Information Center. NVIC Calls 21st Century Cures Act a “Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing and Urges Presidential Veto to Protect the Public Health. Businesswire Dec. 8, 2016.
19 King and Spalding. Accelerated COVID-19 Clinical Trials. May 28, 2020.
20 Fisher BL. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: A Failed Experiment in Tort Reform. Presentation to Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines Nov. 18, 2008.
21 Fisher BL, Williams K, Wrangham TK. Statement by NVIC to GAO on the operation of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. July 11, 2014.
22 Government Accountability Office. Most Claims Took Multiple Years and Many Were Settled through Negotiation. Nov. 21, 2014.
23 Fisher BL. End Pharma Liability Shield Endangering Public Health and Human Rights. NVIC Newsletter Nov. 8, 2016.
24 Milmore MP. Open letter to the Secretary of HHS and HRSA Administrator Re: HRSA proposed Vaccine Rulemaking Making Dramatic Changes in Scope of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Apr. 13, 2020.

12 Responses

  1. Mr. Dober needs to realize that he just set up AstraZeneca for patient compensation regarding VAER’s with their adenovirus COVID-19 vaccine. He asked for “indemnification” for their vaccine, where he should have asked for “exemption from indemnification.” Wording and errant logophilia can cost $$B.

  2. So how can we get that law that protects the pharmaceutical companies overturned? And how can we say no if these untested vaccines are mandated?

  3. All the great unwashed out there who think that Fauci is all that and a bag of chips? Well, your Boy was the main one responsible for the first Vaccine Indemnity Act in 1986. He cooked it up and the neo-con hero boy Ronnie Reagan signed it into law. Just so you all know.

  4. A crime in and of itself! My Grandson is on the spectrum of Autism, and he is 24 now. We all saw it as it happened after his 3rd month baby shots and a high fever.

  5. Don’t want and will not take their crappy vaccine. The shareholders and CEO sold their shares because they know the vaccines are unsuccessful. These degenerates in the pharmaceutical company are not liable for damages in a person. Well the answer is don’t take their vaccine. I wonder if the top people will be giving it to themselves and their children. Let them be the trial people for about 10 years. Fauci and Bill Gates should be the first in line.

  6. AstraZeneca Exempted from Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries & Deaths. Note that
    AstraZeneca is in Cambridge, England but will be supplying the U.S with the vaccine.
    According to a member of AstraZeneca’s senior executive team, Ruud Dober: This is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in four years the vaccine is showing side effects.” … For most countries it is acceptable to take that risk on their shoulders because it is in their national interest. BUT NOT HIS NATIONAL INTEREST BECAUSE HIS COMPANY IS SUPPLYING THE U.S. !
    AstraZeneca and Emergent BioSolutions have struck an $87 million deal to manufacture two billion doses of the University of Oxford’s adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccine to supply to the U.S.

  7. He admits that side effects could show up in 4 years but the medical field won’t accept any side effects after a few weeks or even less.

  8. Re: masks and vaccines and stupid, stupid, stupid people out there. Governator Evers declared mandating masks and so . . . . I see old people with their masks, stumbling over curbs, falling on the ground, their glasses falling off – I see parents with their children ( little ones wearing a stupid mask) and those over the age of 5 is what they say wearing masks required to go anywhere, WTFrell~!!!! Stupid, stupid, stupid. And then when I ask when they will be taking off their masks, they say, when we get a vaccine. Stupid, stupid Stupid. And who will suffer, who will pay for the damages done by present day vaccines and the one that the stupid people want to have. Will people ever wake up?? I wish POTUS would say less about vaccines and more about everyday successful treatments. Maybe while he is away for a while, he will give some credence to looking into already published material – Plague of Corruption, Jon Rappaport’s site NoMoreFakeNews, Del Bigtree’s Highwire program – which has been taken down by Facebook now – Didn’t he have a conversation with RFK Jr. about vaccines? But . . . The whole thing just makes my blood rise. Who wants to admit they have been hoodwinked into believing a mask will prevent anything – except to protect the identity of the criminals creating chaos in cities and towns around the world. Stand up and just say NO. I do. Not wearing a mask is a matter of peaceful protest.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search in Archive