Vaccine Mandates: Ignoring Human Rights and Informed Consent

Vaccine Mandates: Ignoring Human Rights and Informed Consent

The U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee held a hearing on Mar. 5, 2019 titled “Vaccines Save Lives: What is Driving Preventable Disease Outbreaks?”

The very title of the hearing tips the committee’s hand. “Vaccines save lives” is a conclusive statement that preemptively answers the question that follows, making it clear there would be no divergent exploration of the question of what is driving preventable disease outbreaks. Even further, while it is true that some vaccines may save some lives, it is also true that vaccines are not studied for their unintended long- and short-term effects on the body, and that many people’s bodies respond to vaccines in ways that prove harmful to them.

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has paid out more than $4 billion dollars for vaccine injuries since 1988.1 The passive reporting system for vaccine injuries, VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), which captures between one and 10 percent of all adverse reactions,2 receives thousands of reports of injury every year.

If vaccines are saving lives, they are also doing it at the expense of those who are injured or killed by those same vaccines. Where is the “greater good” in that?

The testimonies of those elected to give witness in the Senate hearing all beat a predictable drum: more mandates for more vaccines to be given to more people. There was a push to curtail parental rights and eliminate vaccine exemptions to those vaccines. Who will be allowed to speak in Congress to the issue of human rights, the ethic of medical informed consent, and the right to bodily integrity and autonomy when it comes to vaccine mandates? The United States has confronted and repudiated the ugliness that comes with eugenics, utilitarianism, and medical experimentation in the labs at Tuskegee and the courts of Nuremberg following the horrors of Nazi medical experimentation on human subjects.

It is a violation of human rights to use people as guinea pigs in the great vaccine experiment, and it is immoral for the government to collude with the pharmaceutical companies through the use of vaccine mandates.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) now recommends 69 doses of 16 vaccines be given to children before age 18, with hundreds of vaccines in the pipeline. Many of these vaccines are fast-tracked for approval without adequate safety studies, and each carries both known and unknown risks. Although it is currently in fashion to think otherwise, the science is not settled on vaccines. There is not adequate testing on vaccines to make assurances of safety (new vaccines are usually tested against other vaccines, not inert placebos), and there has never been a true scientifically credible study of those who are vaccinated compared to those who are completely unvaccinated.

Vaccines are a medical intervention given to healthy people that carry a risk of death and serious or debilitating consequences for some individuals. Because of this risk, there must always be choice!

There was no one on the panel of witnesses at the Mar. 5 Senate hearing who gave a voice to that point of view. Why was Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), a longtime advocate of vaccine safety and an expert on vaccine policy and informed consent, not called to testify? Why was a high school student who has spoken with friends and done a bit of Google research asked to participate in a hearing of such serious magnitude when parents of vaccine injured children—people who vaccinated their children in good faith and paid a horrible price—have been left out of the conversation?

If we applaud this child’s right to make medical choices, shouldn’t the choice of informed parents who have come to a different conclusion also be included? Are we abandoning the fundamental American value of intelligent dissent in favor of totalitarianism? 

It’s hard not to conclude that this hearing was set up as a one-sided, unfair and incomplete conversation with a pre-determined outcome. Shame. 

I will close with the words of Dr. Christine Stabell Benn, a vaccine researcher and Professor of Global Health at the University of Southern Denmark. Dr. Benn’s opinion was published in The Times of London on Mar. 2, 2019 in response to a previous article about vaccine hesitancy…

As a vaccine researcher, I strongly oppose mandatory vaccination. The vaccines that are in use were only tested for effects on the vaccine-targeted disease and on side effects in relation to the vaccination. However, there is increasing evidence that vaccines also affect the immune system broadly, reducing or enhancing susceptibility to unrelated diseases. Hence, the vaccine skeptics have a right to point out that we do not know the full effects of vaccines on overall health. It should therefore be a human right to weigh pros, cons and unknowns to make one’s own decision.3


This article or commentary provides referenced information and perspective on a topic related to vaccine science, policy, law or ethics being discussed in public forums and by U.S. lawmakers. The websites of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) provide information and perspective of federal agencies responsible for vaccine research, development, regulation and policymaking.

References:

1 Health Resources & Services Administration. Vaccine Injury Compensation Data. HRSA.gov.
2 National Vaccine Information Center. Can Measles Vaccine Cause Injury & Death? NVIC.org.
3 Stabell Benn C. Times Letters: Immunisation science and ‘vaccine hesitancy’. The Times Mar. 2, 2019.

Note: This commentary provides referenced information and perspective on a topic related to vaccine science, policy, law or ethics being discussed in public forums and by U.S. lawmakers.  The websites of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) provide information and perspective of federal agencies responsible for vaccine research, development, regulation and policymaking.

...

34 Responses to "Vaccine Mandates: Ignoring Human Rights and Informed Consent"

  1. redpill   March 7, 2019 at 1:48 pm

    I wrote this on another blog to get some feedback from people:

    There are schools that will not allow children to attend unless they are vaccinated like in California. In order to receive a public tax payers education which children are entitled to they must be vaccinated-against their parents will violating the Federal law of Informed consent and the right to refuse. Also ignoring Medical Autonomy of the parents. Daycares that won’t accept unvaccinated children despite some receiving state funding. There are hospitals that have fired employees, most noticeably nurses for refusing to submit to the Flu Shot violating their informed Consent and the refusal goes on record which in searching for further employment could affect their ability to get another job. There are hospitals that have refused to treat children in the ER unless they submit to being vaccinated or they are refused outright admittance. This happened in Michigan a few years ago yet Michigan is one of the few states that maintains religious and personal exemptions.

    Extortion:
    Extortion is based upon some type of threat.
    … In some states, merely making a threat is enough to qualify as a crime. Intent. A person commits extortion when making a threat with the specific intention of forcing someone else to provide money, property, or SOMETHING OF VALUE.

    People are being forced to give up Medical Autonomy, Informed Consent and their right to refuse which is SOMETHING OF VALUE. If a child is barred from attending school that the parents tax dollars are paying for unless they submit to a medical procedure that they oppose and do not want, how can that not be extortion? Now bills are being submitted in some state mandating home schooled children be vaccinated. How can that not be extortion? I wondering if those entities can be sued by groups representing parents whose are basically being extorted by the states they live in that allows these practices ?

    Just a thought.

    Reply
  2. redpill   March 7, 2019 at 2:02 pm

    Breaking: FL Congressman Posey Writes Mark Zuckerberg, Weighing-In on the Facebook Censorship Debate:
    https://www.healthnutnews.com/breaking-fl-congressman-posey-writes-mark-zuckerberg-weighing-in-on-the-facebook-censorship-debate/

    Reply
  3. Steve Sanborn   March 7, 2019 at 10:12 pm

    If the physicians and nurses who pressure parents into allowing them to inject their children with vaccines were held by law to be personally responsible for any and all negative effects caused by the vaccines…….this vaccine war would end rather quickly.

    Reply
    • INGRID C DURDEN   March 8, 2019 at 9:28 am

      that is a brilliant idea. Unfortunately as usual, no one in the government will listen to this brilliant idea. Personal responsibility is usual, isn’t it? Doctors are responsible for what they do. Why does the government make an exception with vaccines? Money ?

      Reply
  4. Paget   March 7, 2019 at 10:15 pm

    Okay people…with all the parents who have won money in compensation for the deaths of their children because of vaccines, you would expect the government to finally demand that vaccines be tested against a control group receiving a saline solution so that they can maybe figure out what’s going wrong.

    Instead, we have ampped up propaganda as if those people never died. Instead, the governments of the world are mandating that you have vaccines because they said so.

    Why is losing the liberty, the freedom to say no to drugs, not bothering you?

    I’m wondering which liberty that your government takes away from you is going to be the liberty that you care about?

    Better still…do you actually think that just because you care about a liberty you’re going to get to keep it?

    Reply
  5. Debbie Catz   March 7, 2019 at 10:17 pm

    And this won’t stop as long as our legislators (Congress and in the states) are beholden to Big Pharma for their campaign funds…to keep their cushy jobs. They’re all in bed together…legislators, CDC, Big Pharma. When will the masses see this and start making the case for PUBLICLY FUNDED CAMPAIGNS??? PERIOD!

    Reply
    • Cypher   March 8, 2019 at 6:29 pm

      What I’ve been telling legislators is that the tide is turning. It’s up to them to decide which side of history they want to be on because we will not forget.

      Reply
  6. Vicky   March 7, 2019 at 10:34 pm

    How can they say vaccines saves our children from diseases that could kill them,
    but allow you to get an abortion up until the child is born.

    Reply
    • Natalie Escalera   March 10, 2019 at 12:08 am

      Without abortion there would be no vaccine.

      Reply
  7. Shannon   March 7, 2019 at 10:53 pm

    I recommend that people print out this article and mail it to their legislators.

    Reply
  8. Sandra Lee Smith   March 7, 2019 at 11:16 pm

    In some states, even medical exemptions because of past bad reactions etc are being ignored and/or overridden; how is that a good thing for anyone? This is about TOTAL CONTROL of our lives and bodies: think ENSLAVEMENT to gov’t!

    Reply
  9. Jeff Eiffert   March 7, 2019 at 11:39 pm

    These [people] are injuring and killing kids and lying about it. They wont compensate the parents for injuring and killing their kids (omnibus autism proceedings) and now they are going to silence the parents of the kids they have killed. Am I missing anything. Oh they are passing laws to use coercion and force to vaccinate children.

    Reply
  10. Phil   March 8, 2019 at 1:26 am

    Vaccine companies make billions and billions of dollars on things that don’t work, they are putting in toxic substance into our bodies, to force it onto our kids is not only unethical, but unacceptable!

    Reply
  11. Mikey   March 8, 2019 at 3:07 am

    This evil Medical Tyranny is getting way out of hand very quickly. I’ve never seen such a push for forced vaccinations like this, and at this rate of insane urgency, with absolutely no regard to all the horrible and obvious evidence and facts right in front of thier disgusting, treasonous noses. It goes against all of the Nuremberg Codes. They are purposely pushing us into a very narrow corner, purging us, and with no other way out, but to eventually physically fight for our healthy children, and the survival of the natural human existence, and with no hope in the corrupted courts. And that fight will be at our doorsteps. The whole medical system is rotten to the core – instead of actually helping people get well, and keeping them well naturally, they are purposely keeping people sickly, so that they can “feed” on them for Blood Money Profits their whole lives. And, we will NOT live in such a horrible and treasonous society like this. When they decide to come after us and our children, we will give them a war that they won’t believe – Live for Nothing or Die for Something. Our Founding Fathers gave everything when they signed the Declaration of Independence. To sign that Document of Human Liberty, they put their lives in dire jeopardy. But, they all knew that the evil tyranny had to be stopped, and it was either live in chains, or to live in Freedom – Freedom to think, to choose, and to live. America is a Republic, not a Democracy. America was founded on rebellion towards anything that stinks of evil tyranny. You pass that Forced Vaccination Bill, you will have to live with the outcome of that treasonous act against the basic Liberties that America was founded upon. We will wait for yoir aggression to start, we will wait for those first shots from you fired upon us and our children, that is when you will ignite that war. And, we will eventually win, and you will lose that battle – because that is our duty as Americans. The choice is yours. This is not about the health of Americans – this is about evil control and evil greed at its worst – Period.

    Reply
    • Cypher   March 8, 2019 at 6:02 pm

      Mikey: There are 2 reasons for this insane push:

      1: We are winning and more eyes are open than ever before.
      2: They are frantic to keep on schedule with their dystopian agenda for “Healthy People 2020” (every man, woman, and child injected with toxins by 2020).

      Reply
  12. redpill   March 8, 2019 at 7:44 am

    Vicky-“but allow you to get an abortion up until the child is born”

    That is not true. Please check unbiased data on the matter.

    Reply
    • Elaine   March 8, 2019 at 1:07 pm

      Isn’t that what the bill in NY (and I think another state) was about. If an abortion was botched and the child lives, the doctor can take its life.?

      Reply
  13. Hannah   March 8, 2019 at 11:20 am

    Forced vaccination is simply inappropriate for a disease that is not deadly. It’s hard to understand where these lawmakers are coming from. The whole idea of forced vaccination came from smallpox–which was a deadly disease. (And even there, the vaccine itself killed and maimed and people still wanted to be able to choose). We’re down the rabbit hole…

    Reply
  14. Rick   March 8, 2019 at 1:50 pm

    With recent outbreaks of measles in Washington, New York and other States, it has become clear that more needs to be done to assure that parents of unvaccinated children do not put other children at serious risk. It is time to eliminate discretionary exemptions from requirements that children attending any school be vaccinated.

    20 years ago we though measles had been eliminated as a public health threat, but today we are learning otherwise. Misinformation campaigns erroneously cited as scientifically validated as basis for avoiding vaccinations are largely responsible. When actions by persons, even well intentioned ones, advocate position that put the public health of other children at risk, prudent public policies are required.

    The World Health Organization estimates that, in 2015, there were 134,200 deaths caused by measles, or 367 deaths every single day. In 1980, a staggering 2.6 million people died from measles. That is why measles really is a big deal; it’s a highly infectious virus that is potentially deadly. And it is why global public health officials are doing everything they can to get the rest of the world vaccinated.

    The CDC estimates the impact that vaccination against measles has had in the world. The results are both encouraging and breathtaking. Despite the fact of a global public health campaign underway, approximately 651,600 people died of measles in 2000. That that number has steadily declined to the current estimate of 134,200 people in 2015.

    What would happen if there was no measles vaccine? The CDC estimates that roughly 1.5 million people would die of the disease every single year. That means, from 2000 to 2015, vaccination has saved the lives of 20.3 million people from measles alone. That is a truly breathtaking statistic.

    Why would anyone want to turn a public health success into a public health failure? When a parent acts in a callous, selfish manner, that places other children at risk, there should be legal consequences.

    Reply
    • Cypher   March 8, 2019 at 5:46 pm

      Rick, you are lumping worldwide statistics all into one bucket. This is causing unwarranted fear and misinformation. In 3rd world countries you could literally die from a bad hangnail because the egregious conditions (lack of sanitation, malnutrition, etc..). This is basic knowledge.

      Please compare the deaths from naturally acquired diseases in FIRST world countries to the deaths from vaccines and tell me the benefits outweigh the risks.

      In the context of “risk vs benefit”, the most egregious thing you can say to a grieving parent is “Sorry but the benefits outweighed the risks”.

      Reply
  15. Rick   March 8, 2019 at 5:20 pm

    See also
    Here’s a story from The New York Times that I thought you’d find interesting:

    A 10-year look at more than 600,000 children comes at a time when anti-vaccine suspicion is on the rise again.

    Read More…

    Also just call your local chilsren’s Hospital, department of health or any Doctor you trust to get more factual information.

    If you want to be scared read what’s going on in Japan, Madagascar. Even in the US in Washington, Colorado and New York State to children exposed to measles from nvaccinated schoolmate.

    Perisonal Choice has consequences. If you send your unvaccinated child with measles to school and he/she infects other children; will you as a parent assume financial and legal reaponsibity for the result?

    Reply
    • Cypher   March 8, 2019 at 6:08 pm

      “If you send your unvaccinated child with measles to school and he/she infects other children; will you as a parent assume financial and legal reaponsibity for the result?….”

      It’s pretty ironic that you call for “financial and legal responsibility” when no one has financial and legal responsibility for vaccine damages and deaths.

      What do you have against a lifetime of immunity? It seems that your only goal here is to spread misinformation.

      I think you and the medical establishment need to get on the same page.

      “Association of American Physicians and Surgeons”
      Source: https://aapsonline.org/measles-outbreak-and-federal-vaccine-mandates/

      “The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) strongly opposes federal interference in medical decisions, including mandated vaccines. After being fully informed of the risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the right to reject or accept that procedure. The regulation of medical practice is a state function, not a federal one. Governmental preemption of patients’ or parents’ decisions about accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental decisions about child-rearing.
      A public health threat is the rationale for the policy on mandatory vaccines. But how much of a threat is required to justify forcing people to accept government-imposed risks? Regulators may intervene to protect the public against a one-in-one million risk of a threat such as cancer from an involuntary exposure to a toxin, or-one-in 100,000 risk from a voluntary (e.g. occupational) exposure. What is the risk of death, cancer, or crippling complication from a vaccine? There are no rigorous safety studies of sufficient power to rule out a much higher risk of complications, even one in 10,000, for vaccines. Such studies would require an adequate number of subjects, a long duration (years, not days), an unvaccinated control group (“placebo” must be truly inactive such as saline, not the adjuvant or everything-but-the-intended-antigen), and consideration of all adverse health events (including neurodevelopment disorders).
      Vaccines are necessarily risky, as recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court and by Congress. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid some $4 billion in damages, and high hurdles must be surmounted to collect compensation. The damage may be so devastating that most people would prefer restored function to a multimillion-dollar damage award.
      The smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that you can’t get it now, despite the weaponization of smallpox. Rabies vaccine is given only after a suspected exposure or to high-risk persons such as veterinarians. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was withdrawn from the U.S. market, a decade later than from the Japanese market, because of reports of severe permanent brain damage. The acellular vaccine that replaced it is evidently safer, though somewhat less effective.
      The risk: benefit ratio varies with the frequency and severity of disease, vaccine safety, and individual patient factors. These must be evaluated by patient and physician, not imposed by a government agency.
      Measles is the much-publicized threat used to push for mandates, and is probably the worst threat among the vaccine-preventable illnesses because it is so highly contagious. There are occasional outbreaks, generally starting with an infected individual coming from somewhere outside the U.S. The majority, but by no means all the people who catch the measles have not been vaccinated. Almost all make a full recovery, with robust, life-long immunity. The last measles death in the U.S. occurred in 2015, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Are potential measles complications including death in persons who cannot be vaccinated due to immune deficiency a  justification for revoking the rights of all Americans and establishing a precedent for still greater restrictions on our right to give—or withhold—consent to medical interventions? Clearly not.
      Many serious complications have followed MMR vaccination, and are listed in the manufacturers’ package insert, though a causal relationship may not have been proved. According to a 2012 report by the Cochrane Collaboration, “The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate” (cited by the National Vaccine Information Center).
      Mandate advocates often assert a need for a 95% immunization rate to achieve herd immunity. However, Mary Holland and Chase Zachary of NYU School of Law argue, in the Oregon Law Review, that because complete herd immunity and measles eradication are unachievable, the better goal is for herd effect and disease control. The best outcome would result, they argue, from informed consent, more open communication, and market-based approaches.             
      Even disregarding adverse vaccine effects, the results of near-universal vaccination have not been completely positive. Measles, when it does occur, is four to five times worse than in pre-vaccination times, according to Lancet Infectious Diseases, because of the changed age distribution: more adults, whose vaccine-based immunity waned, and more infants, who no longer receive passive immunity from their naturally immune mother to protect them during their most vulnerable period.
      Measles is a vexing problem, and more complete, forced vaccination will likely not solve it. Better public health measures—earlier detection, contact tracing, and isolation; a more effective, safer vaccine; or an effective treatment are all needed. Meanwhile, those who choose not to vaccinate now might do so in an outbreak, or they can be isolated. Immunosuppressed patients might choose isolation in any event because vaccinated people can also possibly transmit measles even if not sick themselves.
      Issues that Congress must consider:
      • Manufacturers are virtually immune from product liability, so the incentive to develop safer products is much diminished. Manufacturers may even refuse to make available a product believed to be safer, such as monovalent measles vaccine in preference to MMR (measles-mumps-rubella). Consumer refusal is the only incentive to do better.

      • There are enormous conflicts of interest involving lucrative relationships with vaccine purveyors.

      • Research into possible vaccine adverse effects is being quashed, as is dissent by professionals.

      • There are many theoretical mechanisms for adverse effects from vaccines, especially in children with developing brains and immune systems. Note the devastating effects of Zika or rubella virus on developing humans, even though adults may have mild or asymptomatic infections. Many vaccines contain live viruses intended to cause a mild infection. Children’s brains are developing rapidly—any interference with the complex developmental symphony could be ruinous.

      • Vaccines are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. Nor are they the only available means to control the spread of disease.

      AAPS believes that liberty rights are unalienable. Patients and parents have the right to refuse vaccination, although potentially contagious persons can be restricted in their movements (e.g. as with Ebola), as needed to protect others against a clear and present danger. Unvaccinated persons with no exposure to a disease and no evidence of a disease are not a clear or present danger.
      AAPS represents thousands of physicians in all specialties nationwide. It was founded in 1943 to protect private medicine and the patient-physician relationship. “

      Reply
  16. Jeff   March 8, 2019 at 5:23 pm

    See also
    Here’s a story from The New York Times that I thought you’d find interesting:

    A 10-year look at more than 600,000 children comes at a time when anti-vaccine suspicion is on the rise again.

    Read More…

    Also just call your local chilsren’s Hospital, department of health or any Doctor you trust to get more factual information.

    If you want to be scared read what’s going on in Japan, Madagascar. Even in the US in Washington, Colorado and New York State to children exposed to measles from nvaccinated schoolmate.

    Perisonal Choice has consequences. If you send your unvaccinated child with measles to school and he/she infects other children; will you as a parent assume financial and legal reaponsibity for the result?

    Reply
  17. redpill   March 8, 2019 at 5:56 pm

    Elaine
    No. That’s one of trumps many lies. If a fetus is born alive doctors must do everything they can to save it otherwise they can be held accountable.

    Reply
  18. Cheyenne Lang   March 8, 2019 at 6:19 pm

    Why does everyone talk about just the measles vaccine? The problem I have is the increased number of vaccines children are required to get. It’s got to overwhelm their immune system.

    Reply
  19. redpill   March 8, 2019 at 7:00 pm

    Rick
    Newsflash. The CDC lies.
    The measles vaccine is worthless a reported by one of the medical industrial complex’s own: Dr. Gregory Poland.

    -Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 22;154(16):1815-20.
    Failure to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent paradox of measles infections in immunized persons. Poland GA1, Jacobson RM.
    Conclusion: The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons. Because of the failure rate of the vaccine and the unique transmissibility of the measles virus, the currently available measles vaccine, used in a single-dose strategy, is unlikely to completely eliminate measles. The long-term success of a two-dose strategy to eliminate measles remains to be determined. http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=619215

    -Paper: The Re-Emergence of Measles in Developed Countries: Time to Develop the Next-Generation Measles Vaccines? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905323/
    The measles vaccine has failed”, he explained two years ago in a prescient paper, “The re-emergence of measles in developed countries.”

    Dr. Gregory Poland is Professor of Medicine and founder and leader of Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group. Poland is one of the world’s most admired, most advanced thinkers in the field of vaccinology.

    100% vaccination rate will not stop communicable illnesses. Here are some examples of measles outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations.

    PLoS study: “Difficulties in eliminating measles and controlling rubella and mumps: a cross-sectional study of a first measles and rubella vaccination and a second measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination,” has brought to light the glaring ineffectiveness of two measles vaccines (measles–rubella (MR) or measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) ) in fulfilling their widely claimed promise of preventing outbreaks in highly vaccine compliant populations.

    China has one of the most vaccination compliant populations in the world. In fact, measles vaccine is mandatory. So why have they had over 700 measles outbreaks from 2009 and 2012 alone? “The reported coverage of the measles-rubella (MR) or measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is greater than 99.0% in Zhejiang province. However, the incidence of measles, mumps, and rubella remains high.”

    NY Measles outbreak: Of 88 contacts, four secondary cases were confirmed that had either two doses of measles-containing vaccine or a past positive measles IgG antibody. All cases had laboratory confirmation of measles infection, clinical symptoms consistent with measles, and high avidity IgG antibody characteristic of a secondary immune response.”

    Patient Zero is a 22 year old VACCINATED young lady who contracted measles in 2011. From this one contact 88 people were infected with measles. Statically that means at least 90% were vaccinated. Outbreak of Measles Among Persons With Prior Evidence of Immunity, New York City, 2011 http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/58/9/1205

    -The largest measles epidemic in North America in the last decade, occurred in 2011 in Quebec, Canada, where rates of 1- and 2-dose vaccine coverage among children 3 years of age were 95%-97% and 90%, respectively, with 3%-5% unvaccinated.” “Among adolescents, 22% had received 2 vaccine doses. Outbreak investigation showed this proportion to have been an underestimate; active case finding identified 130% more cases among 2-dose recipients.”
    Largest measles epidemic in North America in a decade–Quebec, Canada, 2011: contribution of susceptibility, serendipity, and superspreading events.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23264672

    -Two Fully Vaccinated Doctors Get Measles (2009)
    A measles outbreak in 2009 exposed and infected two physicians, both of whom had been fully vaccinated with two doses of the MMR vaccine. These physicians were suspected of having been infected by treating patients diagnosed with measles. [5]
    http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/204/suppl_1/S559.full.pdf+html

    Vaccinated people are contagious and it has been proven. In fact two prestigious hospitals confirmed this in their patient visitation guideline. Here are link to the guidelines before they changed them after people starred downloading them and putting them online:

    Hospital Warning about Potential Vaccine Shedding
    -Public Health Officials Know: Recently Vaccinated Individuals Spread Disease
    http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/public-health-officials-know-recently-vaccinated-individuals-spread-disease/

    Here is a screen shot of the patient guidelines for John Hopkins:
    https://www.westonaprice.org/public-health-officials-know-recently-vaccinated-individuals-spread-disease/.

    You posted we should be concerned about what is happening with measles outbreaks yet you haven’t posted any specifics. Washington State refuses to say how many in their outbreak are vaccinated. Texas has 6 children with measles and 4 are fully vaccinated. The WHO had no idea how many people in Madagascar have died of measles because there was no lab confirmation. How convenient. UNICEF reports 25,000 children die a day across Africa from malnutrition, malaria, etc. No one is doing autopsies to confirm measles. Many are buried for days or months before authorities are notified. It is estimated 36 million people die a year in Africa and no body is lab testing on millions of people. Who funding that? Japan has 170 cases of measles. For any country including the US it’s the norm and has been the norm until the CDC/Pharma vaccine profiteering began. This is the time of the year measles occurred before the vaccine messed with the natural cycle. You want to know what a genuine outbreak looks like:
    -British Medical Journal Tells Us – Measles Is Not The Scary Disease The Press Want You To Think It Is
    Here are extracts of how measles was described in 1959 in the British Medical Journal showing a very, very different picture compared to the ones we are being given at the moment. The BMJ articles are unfortunately not on open access so you can get access if you have a subscription which allows BMJ online access or you can visit and ask at your local hospital’s library :
    ANNOTATIONS

    Measles epidemic [page 354]
    Br Med J 1959;1:351.2 (Published 07 February 1959)

    In the first three weeks of this year about 41,000 cases of measles were recorded in England and Wales. This is well above the corresponding figures of the last two years – namely, about 9,000 in 1958 and 28,000 in 1957 – though it is below the highest levels reached in the last nine years. To give some idea of the main features of the disease as it appears today and of how it is best treated, we invited some general practitioners to write short reports on the cases they have seen in their practices recently.

    VITAL STATISTICS
    MEASLES
    REPORTS FROM GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
    Br Med J 1959;1:380 (Published 07 February 1959)
    EXTRACTS [pages 380-381]

    MILD AILMENT
    Dr. JOHN FRY (Beckenham, Kent) writes:

    The expected biennial epidemic of measles appeared in this region in early December, 1958, just in time to put many youngsters to bed over Christmas. To date there have been close on 150 cases in the practice, and the numbers are now steadily decreasing. Like previous epidemics, the primary cases have been chiefly in the 5- and 6-year-olds, with secondary cases in their younger siblings. No special features have been noted in this relatively mild epidemic. It has been mild because complications have occurred in only four children. One little girl aged 2 suffered from a lobular pneumonia, and three others developed acute otitis media following their measles. In the majority of children the whole episode has been well and truly over in a week, from the prodromal phase to the disappearance of the rash, and many mothers have remarked ”how much good the attack has done their children,” as they seem so much better after the measles.

    A family doctor’s approach to the management of measles is essentially a personal and individual matter, based on the personal experiences of the doctor and the individual character and background of the child and the family. In this practice measles is considered as a relatively mild and inevitable childhood ailment that is best encountered any time from 3 to 7 years of age. Over the past 10 years there have been few serious complications at any age, and all children have made complete recoveries. As a result of this reasoning no special attempts have been made at prevention even in young infants in whom the disease has not been found to be especially serious.

    This is just one report. NO ONE DIED.
    In the US there are 322 million people and even 200 people with measles doesn’t even move the meter. BTW: how many people have died. How any are permanently damaged? Stop feeding into fear mongering and get some perspective.

    FYI: Doctors have been using the measles virus to treat and cure cancer with remarkable success. Why-because research has shown that the measles virus provides a certain amount of cellular protection from developing certain types of cancers. The WILD strain. Think about that.

    Reply
  20. Doreen Morgan   March 10, 2019 at 3:25 am

    I have more than one autoimmune illness, one of those that I have had since the age of 5. Both I battle on a daily bases, one has put me in the hospital more times that I lost track and it ages me faster than the average person does. I have had bad reactions to some vaccines because of it and our kids carry my genes so they risk triggering the autoimmune diseases if we are not careful. We have taken most of our needed vaccines but there are some we stay away from or spread apart. To force us to take those can be a life sentence I do not want my children to have nor can I afford myself.

    Reply
  21. Rick   March 11, 2019 at 9:39 am

    The New York Times got it right; please pay attention:

    A once-eradicated disease is making a comeback around the country. Lawmakers and social media platforms each have a role to play in fighting back.

    Reply
  22. redpill   March 11, 2019 at 9:45 pm

    Rick:
    When are you going to read some genuine studies and stop reading the pharma conspiracy theories pushed by the NYT? If you have a car do you use the McDonald’s nutritional sheet as your service guide on how everything inside the vehicle works?

    Here is a new study that dropped:
    Journal of Clinical Microbiology, entitled, “Rapid Identification of Measles Virus Vaccine Genotype by Real-Time PCR,”
    – a large number of measles outbreaks are actually “vaccine reactions” from the measles vaccine itself (MMR vaccines).

    “During measles outbreaks, it is important to be able to rapidly distinguish between measles cases and vaccine reactions to avoid unnecessary outbreak response measures such as case isolation and contact investigations,” the study authors write. “We have developed a real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) method specific for genotype A measles virus (MeV) (MeVA RT-quantitative PCR [RT-qPCR]) that can identify measles vaccine strains rapidly, with high throughput, and without the need for sequencing to determine the genotype.

    Almost 38% of measles cases were found to be “vaccine reactions” caused by measles vaccines

    As the published science paper reveals:
    During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees (3). Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences (R. J. McNall, unpublished data).

    In other words, measles outbreaks were occurring among children who were already vaccinated with the measles. If you do the math, nearly 38% of the genetic sequences that were conducted on supposed “measles” cases turned out to identify measles strains that originated in the vaccines themselves. Thus, more than one out of three cases of measles in the United States was actually a reaction from a measles vaccine, not “wild-type” measles.

    Science now proves one-third of measles outbreaks are actually caused by the vaccines themselves. To scientist this is stunning!
    Journal of Clinical Microbiology DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01879-16

    The Vaccinated Spreading Measles
    Detection of measles virus RNA in urine specimens from vaccine recipients.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep; 33(9): 2485–2488.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC228449/

    The 2013 Measles Outbreak: A Failing Vaccine, Not A Failure To Vaccinate
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/2013-measles-outbreak-failing-vaccine-not-failure-vaccinate1

    Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 22;154(16):1815-20.
    Failure to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent paradox of measles infections in immunized persons. Poland GA1, Jacobson RM.
    Conclusion: The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons. Because of the failure rate of the vaccine and the unique transmissibility of the measles virus, the currently available measles vaccine, used in a single-dose strategy, is unlikely to completely eliminate measles. The long-term success of a two-dose strategy to eliminate measles remains to be determined. http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=619215

    -Paper: The Re-Emergence of Measles in Developed Countries: Time to Develop the Next-Generation Measles Vaccines? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905323/
    The measles vaccine has failed”, he explained two years ago in a prescient paper, “The re-emergence of measles in developed countries.”

    Dr. Gregory Poland is Professor of Medicine and founder and leader of Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group. Poland is one of the world’s most admired, most advanced thinkers in the field of vaccinology.

    Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2018 Aug 22;9(3):25-31. doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2018.9.2.005. eCollection 2018 Jul-Sep.
    An investigation of a measles outbreak in Japan and China, Taiwan, China, March-May 2018.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377547
    Results and discussion:

    A single index case gave rise to a total of 38 secondary cases, 33 in Japan and five in China, Taiwan, China. Subsequent chains of transmission were observed in highly vaccinated populations in both Japan and China, Taiwan, China. The effective reproduction number of the second generation was > 1 for both Japan and China, Taiwan, China. In Japan, the reproduction number was estimated to be < 1 during the third generation. Vaccination of susceptible individuals is essential to prevent secondary and tertiary transmission events.

    Published: 1995
    SYNOPSIS
    CDC scientists find children given the MMR vaccine shed the measles virus for at least 2 weeks after getting the vaccine, making them vectors to spread measles.
    TITLE
    Detection of Measles Virus RNA in Urine Specimens from Vaccine Recipients

    CITATION
    Paul A. Rota, Ali S. Khan, Edison Durigon, Thomas Yuron, and William Bellini. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Vol. 33, No. 9, Sept. 1995, p. 2485–2488.
    SUMMARY

    “For the study, daily urine samples were obtained from either 15- month-old children or young adults following measles immunization. Overall, measles virus RNA was detected in 10 of 12 children during the 2-week sampling period. In some cases, measles virus RNA was detected as early as 1 day or as late as 14 days after vaccination. Measles virus RNA was also detected in the urine samples from all four of the young adults between 1 and 13 days after vaccination. This assay will enable continued studies of the shedding and transmission of measles virus and, it is hoped, will provide a rapid means to identify measles infection, especially in mild or asymptomatic cases.”

    Vaccinated people are contagious and as reported by the well know vaccinologist Dr. Gregory Poland-The Measles Vaccine has failed.

    Answer this: If vaccines are safe and effective why has the Justice Dept paid to the families of vaccine injured people over 4 Billion Dollars in compensation?

    -$4 Billion and Growing: U.S. Payouts for Vaccine Injuries and Deaths Keep Climbing-https://vaccineimpact.com/2018/4-billion-and-growing-u-s-payouts-for-vaccine-injuries-and-deaths-keep-climbing/

    -2019 DOJ Report on Vaccine Court Reveals Vaccines Continue to Injure and Kill People: $110 MILLION in Damages Paid Out First Quarter
    http://vaccineimpact.com/2019/2019-doj-report-on-vaccine-court-reveals-vaccines-continue-to-injure-and-kill-people-110-million-in-damages-paid-out-first-quarter/

    If vaccine are safe, effective and they work why did the pharmaceutical companies basically blackmail congress into giving them blanket liability in regards to vaccine? I'll give you a hint. Vaccine makers aka pharma were going broke because they were being sued by parents of children who were vaccine damaged. Because the suits allowed discovery-information was getting out to the public about how vaccines were made and how unsafe they were. Research the rest of the story yourself.

    Reply
  23. redpill   March 11, 2019 at 11:36 pm

    Lawmakers:
    Lamar Alexander, Chairman of the HELP committee, presided over the recent Vaccine Comercials.)-Bloomberg Opinion

    All Media Outlets serve as the ‘Brown Shirts” for the pharmaceutical company. Pharma is projected to profit 64 Billion in 2020.

    “Intellectual honesty is a crime in any totalitarian country.” Orwell

    And for decades our federal health agencies have been compromised by private interests conflict of Interest and bereft of any integrity.

    Reply
  24. Rick   March 19, 2019 at 1:55 pm

    Red pill, Cypher , Marco, Barbara….
    All seem to members of groups pushing an anti-Vaxer bias in reporting, and in a self serving manner intended not to promote reasoned dialogue, but advocacy solely against vaccination. Informed consent is a right, but if you choose not to vaccinate your children, you also have to bear responsibility to other children and their parents. States are well within their rights to restrict school attendance of unvaccinated children. I have yet to hear a parent say they are willing to bear responsibility for infection of another child if their unvaccinated child becomes a carrier of disease.

    In addition recent campaigns directed at parents that lost a child to disease preventable by vaccination are disturbing. How come you don”t cite to this recent reporting from CNN:
    Her son died. And then anti-vaxers attacked her
    CNN

    Many parents that have lost a child to the flu or other vaccine-preventable cause find themselves the target of hateful attacks on social media and by phone — all while they still grieve their loss. Read the full story

    Reply
  25. Magpie   March 21, 2019 at 5:07 pm

    Publicis Groupe, the public relations firm to Pfizer, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi was also hired by GAVI. Gates Foundation is helping fund the 2016 to 2020 drive to “reach every child.” I believe this is roughly the source of an unprecedented propaganda campaign. I’m amazed at the commenters that spout the talking points with arrogance designed to shut down opposition. But when you come for people’s children, they don’t tend to back down.

    The companies are making billions off of this, and using chump change to buy legislators. I can hardly recognize Oregon; I thought I lived in a relatively free state, but overnight the Democratic Party have turned into gestapo… and they’re all taking money! (followthemoney.org)

    Here’s a tidbit from the bent FDA’s own site: “Until a vaccine is given to the general population, all potential adverse events cannot be anticipated. Thus, many vaccines undergo Phase 4 studies-formal studies on a vaccine once it is on the market. Also, the government relies on the Vaccine Adverse Reporting System (VAERS) to identify problems after marketing begins.”

    Nice, the state wants to mandate using our children as guinea pigs for ever more vaccines. I’m outraged with Oregon’s government and disappointed at the herd mentality of those self-appointed mind guards who freely (? or paid?) regurgitate industry propaganda.

    Reply
  26. redpill   March 22, 2019 at 8:03 pm

    Rick
    Red pill, Cypher , Marco, Barbara….
    All seem to members of groups pushing an anti-Vaxer bias in reporting>

    If you have been following this blog for any length of time rather than just dropping in to post pro-vaccine talking points a if you are a hired troll, you’d know that not to be the case. I won’t bother to explain my philosophical perspective because you are immune to facts.

    Her son died. And then anti-vaxers attacked her
    CNN;

    I’m going to post why I’m skeptical of stories like the one on CNN. Pharma has always exploited people and here are 2 examples: Abby Peterson and Jennifer Hibben-White.

    Abby Peterson’s death is being blamed on chickenpox in news articles across the nation. The viral new reports, including current reports from ABC and ABC affiliates, are minimizing key elements of the reality surrounding Abby Peterson’s heartbreaking death in 2001. Articles with headlines like “Mom Advocates for Vaccines After Losing Daughter To Chicken Pox” and “Mom whose child died of chicken pox advocates for vaccines” are being shared by the masses; however, these headlines overlook the sad reality of Abby Peterson’s death to focus on chickenpox.

    What the media DIDN’T DISCLOSE and still hasn’t to this day is Abbey didn’t die from CHICKEN POX. Abbey didn’t have Chicken Pox when she died. Nor did they focus on telling the American public that Abbey was born with a compromised immune system-she was born without a spleen. The spleen plays a crucial role within the immune system because it purifies the blood and helps the immune system recognize and fight infections. Congenital Asplenia (being born without a spleen) is a kind of immunodeficiency. Missing this organ significantly increases the risk of sepsis from certain bacteria like Streptococcus pneumoniae.

    Dr. William Schaffner, a professor at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, a big wing in the vaccine community made sure that every media agency and pharma owned blog-like Forbes, Daily Beat, Daily Mail etc. carried the story and social media comment boards were lit on fire by people like you. Journalist were actually writing articles say anti-vaxxers should be arrested. Others were saying they should have to pay a fine and if a vaccinated child is infected by a un vaccinated child-those parents should be arrested and fined. Much media attention and abusive outrage towards people who chose to maintain their Medical Autonomy and Informed consent was all over the country for weeks. Of course, that was the purpose of the reporting. (IF VACCINE WORKS HOW CAN A VACCINATED CHILD BECOME INFECTED FROM A UNVACCINATED CHILD THAT ISN’T SICK. ISN’T THAT THE POINT OF VACCINES)?
    BUT:
    What was not reported was it wasn’t the truth. Yes, Abbey died not from CHICKEN POX -but from becoming infected with pneumococcal bacteria and sepsis.

    “… our pediatrician came in with Abby’s preliminary autopsy results, stating that she’d had overwhelming sepsis caused by streptococcus pneumonia, congenital asplenia (absence of a spleen) and hemorrhagic adrenal glands,” Mrs. Peterson wrote.

    Mrs. Peterson posted this on a blog on April 4 2004- https://blog.pkids.org/2014/04/04/our-children-are-worth-every-penny/. Interesting how that was NEVER covered by the media. Yet in this article which ran on ABC and other media outlets she never mentioned Abby dying of pneumococcal bacteria and sepsis. Pharma reached back to 2004 to exploit this. This was in the MSM in 2014.

    WHY? And the media never corrected the story. (Pharma relies on their useful idiots not to fact check)

    Mom Whose Child Died After Catching Chicken Pox Advocates for Vaccines Shannon Duffy Peterson said pediatrician talked her out of vaccinating child https://abcnews.go.com/Health/mom-child-died-chicken-pox-advocates-vaccines/story?id=23323301

    How about this story that went vial on social media and MSM: Jennifer Hibben-White back in 2015 (after the Disney False Flag generated by the media) went on a social media rant that went viral accusing Anti-Vaxxers of infecting her baby with Measles. She claimed that her baby became infected with Measles at the doctor’s office from an unvaccinated person. What the media didn’t reported on after people checked out her story was:

    – her grandfather, Alan Hibben, is a principal stockholder within the big pharmaceutical industry along with his buddy Edward Stow, who so conveniently wanted to share your story. Edward Stow is the person who first posted this on facebook. http://vactruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/hibben.jpg
    -when this was discovered Jennifer and Stow shut down their facebook pages.
    -at the end of the day, her baby didn’t have measles and the person who the baby was exposed to in the doctors office was someone who had just been vaccinated for measles because of the Disney FF. A vaccinated person.
    Pharma has been throwing the book of propaganda at the country for the last few months and considering they have already stooped so low as to exploit people, I always look at the CNN stories with skepticism. After all, Mrs. Peterson went along with the story in the MSM and so did Jennifer Hibben-White until she got busted.

    Answer this Rick. What do you say to people who have lost a child after the child was vaccinated? You don’t believe that happens? Here is a link to the adjudicated cases that the government has compensated families for vaccine damage. They have paid out over 4 billion dollars: http://vaccineimpact.com/vaccine-injuries-and-deaths-compensated-through-vaccine-court/.

    Go through the links and look at all the children whose families were able to prove to the Vaccine Court that vaccines damaged or killed their child. These are the IGNORED vaccine damaged children and adults that the MSM deems INVISIBLE. When a parent does post their loss on a comment board the bullying and nastiness is off the wall. The MSM NEVER reports on these cases. These cases are just the ones that families have applied to the court for. Many families are not aware that this court exist because it gets no MSM coverage. Look at all the families that proved their family members were harmed by vaccines.
    CAN YOU CRY FOR THEM?

    How about these children: Infant Dies Following 5 Vaccine Doses- https://vactruth.com/2015/09/05/infant-dies-after-5-vaccine-doses/
    -Ryan Morley- died on January 22, 2003, at just 8 ½ months old. Forty-two days after that well child visit, multiple organs of his shut down and his little body couldn’t fight anymore.

    A 7-Pound Premature Baby Died After Receiving 8 Vaccine Doses, Her Death Was Blamed On Co-Sleeping Instead Of The Toxic Vaccines: Aysia Hope Clark was born nearly a month and a half premature. When she was six weeks old, her doctor detected a heart murmur. He then had the nurse administer eight vaccine doses into her tiny little body. Ten days later, which is a critical time children die from vaccine-related injuries, Aysia stopped breathing, her heart stopped beating and she died while sleeping on her mother’s arm.
    The pathologist’s opinion was that Aysia died from positional asphyxiation related to co-sleeping and being born prematurely, without having to prove this is what she died from. There was no mention on her autopsy report that she had been recently vaccinated. Aysia died on July 4, 2015, exactly ten days after receiving eight vaccine doses.
    -4 Month Old Baby Donates Organs After Receiving 7 Vaccine Doses. Parents in Wisconsin are grieving over the loss of their infant son following routine vaccinations. Less than one day after receiving seven vaccine doses at his four-month baby checkup, Zaire Corvell Thomas went into cardiac arrest and stopped breathing in his sleep. His mother and emergency responders helped save him.

    “Rick-Many parents that have lost a child to the flu or other vaccine-preventable cause find themselves the target of hateful attacks on social media and by phone — all while they still grieve their loss. Read the full story”

    I read the story and as I posted, I’m always a little skeptical of this because it is a tactic of pharma to exploit. How about you read the stories of parents who lost their children to vaccines at this link: https://vactruth.com/category/vaccine-injury/.

    WILL YOU CRY FOR THEM?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.