Drop in Measles Cases in 1960s Coincided With End of “Baby Boomer” Babies

Drop in Measles Cases in 1960s Coincided With End of “Baby Boomer” Babies

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states that, prior to the introduction of the first measles vaccine in the United States in 1963, it had been receiving nearly 500,000 reported cases of measles each year.1 2 3 4 That number is correct if you average the total number of measles cases reported during 1958-1962. The average comes to 503,282 cases annually.4 5 6

The picture looks a lot different, however, if you delete from the equation the year 1958. If you take the measles cases reported during 1959-1962, the annual average comes out to 438,3285 6—or almost 20,000 less than the measles cases reported to the CDC the year after the measles vaccine was introduced in the U.S. The CDC received 406,162 reported cases of measles in 1959; 441,703 in 1960; 423,919 in 1961; and 481,530 in 1962.5 6 It received 385,156 reported cases of measles in 1963 and 458,083 in 1964. This is worth noting because it is often pointed out that after the measles vaccine was introduced, the incidence of measles plummeted.

According to a 1992 paper written by Jacqueline Gindler, William Atkinson and Lauri Markowitz in the journal Epidemiologic Reviews:

Following the introduction and widespread use of measles vaccines, measles incidence declined dramatically.4

The impression given here is that the decline was sharp and immediate. Not quite. The dramatic decline in the number of reported measles cases occurred in 1965 when they dropped to 261,904, followed by 204, 136 in 1966; 62,705 in 1967; 22, 231 in 1968; and 25,826 in 1969.

“By 1978, the number of reported cases had decreased by almost 95 percent compared with the prevaccine era,” wrote Gindler, Atkinson and Markowitz.4

There is no question that 95 percent decrease represents a marked decline in reported cases of measles in the U.S. during that period. It is interesting, though, that the reported decline in measles cases correlates with other reported declines occurring in the U.S. population at that time, including a significant decline in birth rates between 1965-1969. For the first time since World War II ended in 1945, there were less than 20 live births per 1,000 people in the U.S. The birth period for the so-called “Baby Boomer” generation had come to an end. There were far fewer babies being born beginning in 1965 than in each of the previous 20 years.7 8

In 1965, there were a total of 3,760,358 live births in the U.S., compared to 4,027,490 in 1964. That’s 267,132 fewer American babies in that year’s birth cohort. If you compare 1965 to 1957, a year when the Baby Boomer birth rate hit its peak at 25.3 live births per 1,000 (for a total of 4,308,000 live births), the difference is 547,642 fewer American babies born in 1965. That peak birth rate in 1957 may have had something to do with the 763,094 reported cases of measles in 19585 6 7—the peak annual number for measles cases recorded in the 1950s.

Live births in the U.S. steadily declined after 1957 to 24.5 per 1,000 in 1958; 24.3 in 1959; 23.7 in 1960; 23.3 in 1961; 22.4 in 1962; 21.7 in 1963; 21.0 in 1964 and 19.4 in 1965. The rates kept dropping throughout the rest of the 1960s and the 1970s when they leveled off at 14.8 in both 1975 and 1976, and they have remained under 17 ever since—mostly under 16.

Is it possible that significant and consistent declines in U.S. birth rates after 1957 were at least a co-factor in the significant and consistent declines in reported measles cases beginning in 1965?


1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles Vaccination. CDC.gov.
2 CDC. Measles Data and Statistics. CDC.gov Feb. 16, 2018 (last updated).
3 CDC. Measles Data and Statistics. CDC.gov Feb. 16, 2018 (last updated).
4 Gindler JS, Atkinson WL, Markowitz LE. Update—The United States Measles Epidemic, 1980-1990. Epidemiologic Reviews 1992.
5 Cáceres M. The Story of Measles’ Sharp Decline. The Vaccine Reaction Apr. 12, 2016.
6 CDC. Summary of Notifiable Diseases, United States: 1989Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Oct. 5, 1990; 38(54):56-58.
7 Live Births and Birth Rates, by Year. Infoplease.com.
8 Baby Boomer. Investopedia.com.

3 Responses to "Drop in Measles Cases in 1960s Coincided With End of “Baby Boomer” Babies"

  1. redpill   January 17, 2019 at 6:28 pm

    Is it possible that significant and consistent declines in U.S. birth rates after 1957 were at least a co-factor in the significant and consistent declines in reported measles cases beginning in 1965?

    Or, after the vaccine was introduced the CDC began diagnosing measles differently. I have family in the medical field and I was told when pediatricians saw kids with symptoms and labs as measles they would diagnose the un-vaccinated kids with “measles,” but the vaccinated kids-same symptoms & labs would be diagnosed as “viral syndrome, NOS.” This was on the basis that they assumed the vaccinated kids could NOT possibly have the disease! So maybe measles cases didn’t decline as much as the CDC would like people to believe. After all, isn’t it the CDC that determines what is measles and what isn’t?

    Also, according to the CDC’s Measles pink book:
    -Fever is the most common adverse reaction following MMR vaccination. Although measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines may cause fever after vaccination, the measles component of MMR vaccine is most often associated with this adverse reaction. After MMR vaccination, 5% to 15% of susceptible persons develop a temperature of 103oF (39.4oC) or higher, usually occurring 7 to 12 days after vaccination and generally lasting 1 or 2 days. Most persons with fever are otherwise asymptomatic.
    (A fever is a higher-than-normal body temperature and is a part of our body’s natural response to infection. -Cleveland Clinic.
    This means the person is infected BUT only displaying a fever. If the person is infected they are contagious.)

    -Measles- and rubella-containing vaccines, including MMR, may cause a transient rash. Rashes, usually appearing 7 to 10 days after MMR or measles vaccination, have been reported in approximately 5% of vaccinees.
    (The rash is called Koplik spots and the CDC says this is an early sign of the measles infection. This person is thus contagious)

    -Than there is the person who can get full blown measles from the vaccine:
    https://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/my-sons-vaccine-related-measles/ (image)

    So maybe the reports of measles cases declining is sort of a slight of hand.
    Just thinking.

  2. Elaine   January 18, 2019 at 2:46 pm

    Redpill – thanks for your interesting input!

  3. Chris   April 18, 2019 at 1:49 am

    Simple answer to this is no. The reason is that not only infants got vaccinated after that date but all children who had access to the vaccine and hadn’t gotten measles. So the vaccination rate exponentially increased during that time period. If it was due to the birth rate it would’ve correlates linearly with it but it doesn’t. A simple t test shows that it doesn’t correlate with any statistical significance. Whoever wrote that article needs to take a basic stats or regression analysis class.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.