Tuesday, June 23, 2026

GET OUR FREE E-NEWSLETTER

“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”

— William Wilberforce

Search

Actor Loses Lawsuit After Being Fired On Set for Refusing COVID-19 Shot

Actor Loses Lawsuit After Being Fired On Set for Refusing COVID-19 Shot

Rockmond Dunbar, who appeared in the television hit series 9-1-1, lost a lawsuit in which he argued that he was unjustly fired from the show in 2022 for refusing to take a COVID-19 shot. An eight-member federal jury unanimously sided with 20th television, a Disney owned television studio.1

Dunbar, who played Michael Grant on the popular 9-1-1 series and is best known for portraying Kenny Chadway in Showtime’s series adaptation of the classic film Soul Food, sought a medical exemption followed by a religious exemption to the COVID shot mandate imposed on the cast of 9-1-1. His application for a medical and then a religious exemption was denied by the Disney studio.

The actor is a member of Congregation of Universal Wisdom which does not allow vaccination or certain medical procedures. Rather than be allowed an exemption, Dunbar was written off the show.2 3

During a four-day trial in Los Angeles, Dunbar explained that his religious beliefs prevented him from getting the controversial biological product. The actor testified that the shot was against God’s teachings and harmful to the body.4

Dunbar testified:

Man created the COVID-19 vaccine to separate you from God,’ he testified, per the outlet.

‘This is a spiritual war. This is a war of evil against good. I stood on the side of good. I stood on the side of God. I stood on the shoulders of God.5

Dunbar’s Sincerity Called Into Question

Despite Dunbar’s lawyer Scott Street argued that the actor’s sincerity was evidenced by the fact that he was willing to lose his job over his strong religious objection to the shot. The actor’s credibility was called into question when he admitted that he took testosterone injections, which were among 37 different medications he had taken over the years, contrary to the teachings of the Congregation of Universal Wisdom.6

Street explained:

What matters is whether he is true to himself and true to his belief,’ Street said. ‘It doesn’t have to be right. There are plenty of beliefs that are right, wrong, kooky—who cares? What matters is whether you believe them. It’s not up to your employer to question your belief.7

The Congregation of Universal Wisdom did not support the actor in his legal battle. The religious group did not agree that the actor’s decision stemmed from his religious beliefs because he had used other medications, which they maintained demonstrated that he was not adhering to the teachings of the Congregation of Universal Wisdom.8

Distraught Actor Calls Out Upon Hearing Verdict

Upon hearing the verdict, Dunbar, who said that his work on 9-1-1 was a dream job, shouted, “Oh my God! Oh my God!” and publicly apologized to his family, “I’m so sorry. I’m so sorry. We’ll be okay.”9 Previously, Dunbar was earning $100,000 per episode of the show. The actor testified that he has had a hard time finding work since he was fired and that his savings have been depleted.10

Dunbar concluded:

Take my cars, my money. I don’t care. You have to leave here with your soul intact. This is my spiritual test and I passed.11


If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.

Click here to view References:

9 Responses

  1. After watching a documentary on Freemasonry again, I am reminded that many judges are Freemasons, and when someone comes to court and tries to go against others Freemasons (within Disney and others), you will lose every single time. This is the reason so many crooks in the government and elsewhere are turned loose. All they have to do is flash a Freemason secret sign, and they walk away. It’s absolutely demonic. Remember that picture of Prince Harry with his hand partly in his jacket and two fingers out…that is one of their signs. It wasn’t because “he felt more secure” with his hand over his stomach. 🤦🏼‍♀️

    1. What a bunch of BS. This has nothing to do with Freemasonry. There are no secret signs that would cause people to do illegal things. Don’t be so gullible.

  2. Glad to see Mr. Dunbar stood up for what he believed. There are very few on the plant that have any integrity at all, covid proved that. Many talk the talk but do not walk the walk. Well done.

  3. he probably didn’t have a good lawyer or tried to defend himself. He wanted to use the religious exemption, but he should have introduced the deaths and terrible side effects of those killer shots. At least he is alive. So many actors have died early due to the shots. Turbo cancer is from those shots too.

  4. What we all tend to forget is that no one has any rights over our bodies and decides what we put in them period! We are sovereign human beings with God given rights and those decisions are ours and ours alone.

  5. I think that Mr Dunbar suffered from poor legal representation…that the circular within the COVID vaccines states that they have not been shown prevent the disease or reduce its transmission, the argument of what the vaccine actually does to protect a healthy middle-aged man is somewhat self-refuting…

  6. Thoughtful look at how vaccine mandates intersect with employment rights in a high-profile industry. It highlights the challenge of balancing public health considerations with individual medical decisions and job security.

  7. They based their decision solely on the fact that he admitted he took testosterone injections, which were among 37 different medications he had taken over the years, contrary to the teachings of the Congregation of Universal Wisdom. Period. Any port in a storm.

    They have been trying to get this mRNA technology crap approved by the FDA for decades and have been unsuccessful so they had no choice but to administer the injections under an EUA.

    The ONLY way an EUA is granted is if there are “no other ways to successfully treat the virus,” but there were other successful ways to treat the virus so why not pull the EUA’s? The EUA’s should have never been issued to begin with. They knew Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine worked way back when.

    And if the injections are so safe then why do all the injection manufacturers have blanket immunity? Take away their blanket immunity and watch how fast the word “vaccine” goes away.

    This has nothing to do with our health and it never did.

    It’s all about the Benjamin’s.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search in Archive

Search in Site

To search in site, type your keyword and hit enter

Search