On July 15, 2025, a study conducted in Denmark was published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine that concluded there is no evidence of a link between the aluminum vaccine adjuvant in and a wide range of chronic health conditions, including asthma, autism, and autoimmune diseases. The cohort study looked at data from 1,224,176 children born in Denmark during 1997-2018 and concluded that, “Cumulative aluminum exposure from vaccination during the first 2 years of life was not associated with increased rates of any of the 50 disorders assessed.”1 2 3 4
The study was conducted by a group of researchers from the Statens Serum Institute, Denmark’s public health agency. Senior author Anders Peter Hviid seemed confident about reassuring the public of the study’s findings, saying… “We can exclude meaningful increases with a large degree of certainty for many of these outcomes. We should not be concerned about aluminum used as an adjuvant in childhood vaccines.”2
However, Hviid also went on to say… “These “aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines are really important for our immunization programs. Not just in Denmark, not just in the U.S., but globally. We don’t have any replacements for these vaccines with other adjuvants. So if you take them away, children are going to die.”2
This sentiment would seem to suggest a certain inherent bias.
Of the total number of children in the study, 1.2 percent received no “aluminum-adsorbed vaccines.” The rest of them had received different doses, with the amount of exposure to aluminum ranging between 0.125 to 1,00 milligrams (mg) per dose and overall median exposure of 3 mg.1 3
Mainstream Feels Vindicated by Aluminum Study Results
Of course, the study is being hailed by the pharmaceutical industry, the corporate media, and many within the medical profession as proof that they’d been right all along. “While anti-vaccine advocates like [Robert F.} Kennedy [Jr.] routinely dismiss and attack the plethora of studies that do not support their dangerous claims, the new study should reassure any hesitant parents,” wrote Beth Mole in Ars Technica.4
“This is a rigorous and well-designed study that should put to rest any lingering doubts about the potential risks to children from cumulative aluminum exposure in vaccines,” said epidemiologist Edward Belongia, MD of Marshfield Clinic Research Institute in Wisconsin. “As a practicing pediatrician, I find that reassuring, and my patients and other clinicians I work with should find that reassuring,” said Matthew Daley, MD. “I feel a sense of gratitude that they undertook this study.”2
Hvid said, “In an era marked by widespread misinformation about vaccines, it is crucial to rely on solid scientific evidence. Large, population-based register studies like this one are a bulwark against the politicization of health science, which undermines public trust in vaccines. He stressed that the aluminum in vaccines is in the form of “extremely small amounts of aluminum salts,” suggesting that the amounts are so small they could not possibly be harmful.5
And besides, as epidemiologist Michael Osterholm, PhD, MPH of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) pointed out, “Aluminum is part of our daily diet and has been since the beginning of time. That is the point people don’t understand,” again implying the harmless nature of the metal.6
Similarly, Carly Cassella wrote in Science Alert:
Compared to other sources of aluminum ions in our everyday lives, which are ubiquitous, the amount that children ingest from vaccines is negligible. Aluminum is an unavoidable part of our daily diets, with traces found in plants, soil, water, and air.7
Aluminum in Vaccines is Different from Aluminum in the Environment
Christopher Exley, PhD, who is among the world’s leading experts on aluminum, has published many studies on the toxicity of environmental aluminum exposures for humans, including via aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. In his 2020 book “Imagine You are an Aluminum Atom,” he explained the chemical and biological reactivity of aluminum and its impact on human health.8 9
A former Professor of Bioinorganic Chemistry at Keele University in England and an Honorary Professor at UHI Millenium Institute, Dr. Exley said in 2019:
The presence of aluminium in brain tissue is an intoxication. It will inevitably exert toxicity at a local level. Future research is required to ascertain the significance of discrete aluminium-related neurotoxicity and how the additive effects of such neuropathologies may eventually contribute towards recognised global neurodegenerative disease characteristic of conditions such as AD, MS, epilepsy and ASD.10
Pediatrician Larry Palevsky, MD addressed the levels of aluminum in vaccines, stating, “You’ve heard that there’s no real concern about aluminum [in vaccines] because it’s such a small amount and so really it shouldn’t matter. But the kind of aluminum that we put into vaccines is a different kind of aluminum that we see environmentally.”11 According to Dr. Palevsky:
This is called a nanoparticle. And nanoparticles bind really tightly to the bacteria antigens, the virus antigens, the food protein antigens, and any other contaminants that are in the vaccines that we may not know about. And we know that the biochemical properties of lipid nanoparticles is that they are capable of entering the brain. And so we have not evaluated the safety of the aluminum nanoparticle and its injection and where it goes when it gets into the body and whether it gets into the brain.11
He adds…
Do vaccine ingredients belong in the brain? No. Do they get into the brain? No one has ever studied it. But animal studies using the same chemicals that are in vaccines that we give to children directly demonstrate that the vaccine ingredients do enter the brain.11
Palevsky warns, “We are ignoring this information.”11
Study Exclusion Criteria Would Have Excluded Most American Children
One of the most interesting aspects of this Danish study is the strict exclusion criteria for children who had received a number of vaccines routinely administered to children in the U.S. by age two. Unsurprisingly, this scientific issue has received no attention from the U.S. media. This tidbit can be found tucked away in the study’s Supplement Table 1 titled “Exclusion criteria, outcome, and covariate definitions” under “Implausible number of childhood vaccines.”12
The children who were denied participation in the study were those who had received more than three diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines, more than three Hepatitis B vaccines, or more than three pneumococcal conjugate vaccines by two years of age. That means that every single child in the United States who was administered those vaccines, which are universally recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would not have been included in the study.12
Under the CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule, a child should receive four doses of the diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (DTaP) vaccine, four doses of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine, and four doses of pneumococcal conjugate (PCV15, PCV20) vaccine before two years of age.13
So what do the conclusions of the Danish study mean for American children? Hard to say. Not only because most children living in the U.S. would not have been included in the study, but because this was not a placebo-controlled randomized study comparing kids vaccinated with aluminum-containing vaccines to kids who did not receive aluminum containing vaccines, and because the researchers only examined the medical records of the children up to five years of age. The five year cut-off for evaluating the 1.2 million children in the study means that the long term health outcomes of these children is not known.
Corrected Version of Study Provides Different Data
These are fairly significant limitations of the study. Add to this the recent revelation that the study researchers included an “incorrect version of the Supplementary Material” at the time of the initial publication of their study in the Annals of Internal Medicine. According to an article in The Defender, the corrected version of the material, the study’s finding are much less conclusive than initially reported.14 15 The publication quoted Karl Jablonowski, PhD, senior scientist for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), as saying:
According to the corrected data, nearly 10 (9.7) of every 10,000 children who were vaccinated with a higher dose of aluminum (compared to a moderate dose) developed a neurodevelopmental disorder—mostly autism—between ages 2 and 5.15
The authors of the study “completely obfuscated what they really found—a statistically significant relationship between aluminum exposure and autism,” said Brian Hooker, PhD, CHD’s chief scientific officer.15
If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.
Click here to view References:1 Andersson NW, Svalgaard IB, Hoffmann SS, Hviid A. Aluminum-Adsorbed Vaccines and Chronic Diseases in Childhood: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Annals of Internal Medicine July 15, 2025.
2 Branswell H. Study finds no evidence aluminum salts in vaccines are tied to higher risk of asthma, other childhood diseases. STAT July 14, 2025.
3 Delandro T. No link found between aluminum in vaccines and autism: Study. The Hill July 16, 2025.
4 Mole B. Large study squashes anti-vaccine talking points about aluminum. Ars Technica July 15, 2025.
5 Abene S. Danish Study Reinforces Safety of Childhood Vaccines with Aluminum Adjuvants. Contagion Live July 16, 2025.
6 Sullivan K. Study finds no link between aluminum in vaccines and autism, asthma. NBC News July 14, 2025.
7 Cassella C. Study of 1.2 Million Children Finds No Risk From Common Vaccine Additive. Science Alert July 16, 2025.
8 Exley C. An aluminium adjuvant in a vaccine is an acute exposure to aluminium. J Trace Elements Med Biol 2020; 57: 57-59.
9 Exley C. Imagine You Are An Aluminum Atom. Skyhorse Publishing 2020.
10 Exley C, Mold MJ. Aluminium in brain human rissue: how much is too much? J Biol Inorg Chem 2019; 24: 1279-1282.
11 TheFelsyFamily. Doctor SPEAKS Out | Dangers of Aluminum in Vaccines. YouTube 2021.
12 Supplementary Material*
13 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule by Age (Addendum updated July 2, 2025).
14 Annals of International Medicine. Correction: Aluminum-Adsorbed Vaccines and Chronic Diseases in Childhood. July 17, 2025.
15 Burdick S. Calls Grow for Journal to Retract Danish Study After Corrected Data Show Link Between Aluminum in Vaccines and Autism. The Defender July 24, 2025.
20 Responses
Do we need any studies to determine that putting aluminum into any body can be destructive? This should be common sense as this is not a substance our bodies require to survive. Is the medical mafia this STUPID? YES! Big pharma demands that they be that stupid and they happily comply barbecue they get a nice big fat bonus or payoff.
What you suggest is common sense. It is also true that cadaver studies have been completed a very long time ago showing the bio-accumation of Al in Alzheimers.
The Al is added to vaxs and quaxs (mRNA) as an adjuvant to provoke immunity.
Without it there is no such immune reaction.
The typical goons are trotting out the tired “just a little bit” storyline as they have done for pesticides, weed killers, etc. They lie as always and have their media sponsors to parrot the lie.
Aluminum Injected into the blood stream gets past the blood-brain barrier. Period. Aluminum is a poor conductor for electricity and when in the brain….has the same flaw,preventing brain waves (electricity) from functioning properly. God forgive the doctors and scientists who know this and do nothing about it. God give strength and courage to those who are trying to correct this situation.
…..’Darby’, the issue is that aluminum (PARTICULARLY ‘salts’ form) with its OWN crystalline matrix (there’s a REASON why it’s next to silicon on the Periodic Table) produces a biologically-SIGNIFICANT amount of PIEZOelectricity (or, electrostatic charge; PRESSURE) which can (and DOES) cause increasingly-SERIOUS physical complications…..
It is idiotic to claim that the amount is so small as to have not harm when you are injecting it directly into the child’s bloodstream many many times. It can in no way, be compared to ingesting through foods.
And the reason adjuvants are used is because they are poison and of course, they create a reaction in the body that these “experts” claim is an immune response because they see antibodies from the adjuvant. Antibodies are non specific and the reaction is what you would see if you injected anyone with toxins. It’s the body’s way of trying to de-tox the poison. I has NOTHING to do with immunity. They use adjuvants because the toxic quality of the vaccine substance alone wasn’t toxic enough to provoke a strong response they seek. More poison, greater reaction, greater harm.
You’ve got the basics down quite well Mr Robert. It’s a magic trick, all this research. People continue to buy in because they fail to understand the basic premise of health and disease reaction. Goes like this; Inject toxin. Observe toxic response from the immune system. Shout; Eureka! We’ve cracked the case! Pretend whatever came alongside the toxin created the immune response. Measure the microscopic cellular activity within blood for irrelevant markers. Whatever rode along the toxin, of course they’ll find a marker, indicating that specific items presence, a virtually guaranteed result every time. Allegedly proving that vaccination is more reliable than naturally acquired immunity. Having skipped the three or more phases of disease response and naturally occurring immunization reaction. Where one heats up and responds to illness, before cooling down and getting better. Rather the body becomes confused and attacks itself. That’s where the chronic health conditions come from, bypassing the bodies natural defenses and injecting the toxin directly into the blood stream. And that’s how the business sector for ‘health care’ continues to grow. Guaranteed investment gains. What these people are doing is not science. They are not experts.
At this point in time I’d say calling them experts in any sense is an insult . They are more or less just salesmen or should I just say prostitutes. The Covid debacle proved to anyone aware enough to look that neither the government or doctors can be trusted. They all banded together to push a know. Deadly drug while in perfect unison attacking , firing, canceling and blacklisting any doctor who dared tell the truth.
The time has come where we demand answers and accountability for these evil deeds. So asking us to trust your studies is laughable. Pfizer did a study showing Ivermectin as mostly useless, no surprise. Dr Peter Kory showed in simple terms exactly how they manipulated timing dosages and duration to get the results they wanted. When it comes to these schedule vaccines I’ve yet to see any of them admit that NOT ONE OF THEM was tested ever against a Placebo. The lies are too long and many to ever trust these people ever again because it really was and is all about the money and their greed is limitless.
salestitutes?
Accurate Assessment
Interesting study and interesting information in the small print about the key relevance of vaccine protocols in different parts of the world upon relying upon these study results. Could not see from the above report summary if anyone attached to this study at Statens Serum Institute, Denmark’s public health agency and Senior author Anders Peter Hviid received any funding or quid per quo for this work and clean not compromised no conflict of interest statements.
Great information! Love to hear more we pray for Robert Kennedy and his crew to straighten this mess out, I am a physician for 45 years, and understand the dangers of heavy metals injected at such an age. My children and my grandchildren have never been vaccinated very healthy and still alive! Keep the information going in the right direction thank you for all you do.
Pray for God to abundantly pour His Spirit of Truth and Wisdom in latter day rain on all of humanity because RFK Jr is very likely not the advocate we hope for. On CHD in a podcast video with his meme guru Charles Eisenstein, RFK Jr discussed his ardent desire to create large federal workcamps for drug addicts and the mentally ill based on the workcamp (gulag) he toured in Italy owned and managed by the very wealthy heir to an oil & gas fortune. (A Netflix documentary covered extreme controversies associated with the camp to include the murder of a resident by guards.) Dovetails with SCOTUS ruling on effectively banning the homeless from sleeping outdoors and Trump’s EO to make being homeless a crime and moving to revoke laws of consent for institutionalization. RFK Jr’s environmental career was funded by the same dynasties funding big pHARMa’s agenda and the rise of global technocracy. Little wonder years ago he stated publicly that skeptics of the official UN climate change narrative should literally be jailed, “put on trial at the Hague” and “given three hots and a cot”. Not quite the champion of a free and transparent society, and his recent proposal for getting everyone to wear health trackers should be concerning and shares echoes what Dr Eric Topol, a prominent proponent of AI ‘medicine’, proposed in the spring of 2020 for covid surveillance. The bible warns us of wolves in sheep’s clothing.
Wow that is an unethical “scientific study” conclusion at work
…..the RESOLUTE institutional IGNORANCE and scientific ILliteracy of these obtuse IDIOTS, is SO infuriating; can’t REASON their way out of a paper bag – I could personally DEMOLISH any argument for EVER administering ‘vaccines’ AGAIN – but, it’d likely be LOST on such…..very practice, has BADLY compromised ‘zeta potential’ versatility for DECADES by ‘chaotropes’ LIKE aluminum (with SIGNIFICANT piezoelectric charge corruption of KEY biological processes); RENDERED those receiving them FAR more vulnerable to neurodegenerative diseases, cancer / oncogenic pathologies, metabolic dysregulation, other autoimmune disorders (ALL through INITIAL protein misfolding, mutagenesis of cells at injection sites) and ULTIMATELY, premature deaths…..
Aluminum is only toxic and serves no beneficial function. Aluminum nanoparticles behave much differently than aluminum in solution, which has many sources, e.g. food, medicine, personal care, cooking utensils and food foil. Aluminum become about 5x more toxic to the brain when cheated by Glyphosate, now a ubiquitous toxin in the US population. Fluoride is another neurotoxin that behave symbiotically with the aluminum-glyphosate, especially in the pineal gland toxicity. Further, low vitamin D predisposes to these combined toxic effects and US D3 levels have declined from 30 to 20 ng/ml since 1990. The younger the aluminum administration, the greater the impact on ASD. Many of these effects occur in utero. Finally,, microbiome perturbations caused by the antibiotic effects of glyphosate are neuroinflammatory. Altogether, the US has moved in all these wrong directions simultaneously, accounting the the US epidemic of ASD. 585.749.4611
article quote; are a bulwark against the politicization of health science, which undermines public trust in vaccines / response; Nope. It was the heavy handed authoritarianism and lifetime of discrimination for making independent health decisions that undermined our trust. We’re not vaccine hesitant. We said no, and we meant no. Because of the obvious corruption and conflicts of interest at every turn, the constant application of heavy handed force and exclusionary principals in an effort to force our compliance. Good ideas do not require such force.
And they lied about the studies conclusions to generate a lot of hype, after carefully manipulating the study peramiters then conveniently only discovering omission after they’d published. What else would you expect from liars.
We’re not vaccinated. Our children are not vaccinated. We have lived our lives around filth and disease, constantly exposed to some of the most disgusting third world practices which come with the migrant communities in Colorado, for most of our lives. These people consistently and predictably refuse to wash their hands after using restrooms, among other unspeakable events and actions which are socially acceptable to migrant communities these days. When do we get to experience this mysterious condition of ‘dying’ because we did not take vaccines?
Independent researchers have found that the aluminum nano particles do deposit deep within brain tissue and large muscle tissue, often coalescing and pooling in the thighs and other parts of the leg. Autopsy of some of the most degenerated people with serious health issues whom had all the recommended vaccines and then some, has brought the remarkable discovery. They said this should not be here, yet there it was clear as day, liquid aluminum within muscle tissues. It forms in a sort of lesion or cyst, as the body is unable to do anything else with it except desperate containment. There is even less ability of the body to purge the aluminum toxin if they have other major health ailments.
Not to worry, nobody will go to jail. Nobody is going to lose their pharmasuetical investment positions. There will be no consensus despite anyones best or honest efforts. Normal ethics no longer apply in just about any major industry anywhere. Corporations alongside the politicians and bureaucrats under their control live by a different set of rules. They are above the law and they have over the course of time created a system which glorifies their activities, an associated moral code they have all adopted, that they demand you adopt this code and belief as well, which clearly states they can do no wrong.
The facts no longer matter. The statistics are irrelevant. This is a system of control and power. Immense wealth generation which has surpassed any reasonable expectation of due process or legal constraint. They back into predetermined conclusions every last time and if you can’t see this you are truly blind. An infinite slow walk of every issue, forever. They’ll just have to do more studies, and you’ll just have to continue to wait, to one day maybe know more about the issue. They are the only authority on the matter you can trust. All other studies or evidence which comes from outside of this system of control will not be considered valid. Now, repeat after me; Safe AND Effective.
Many thanks for publishing this article! it must find further pulication in all facets of “mainstream” media! And very appreciative of the comments shared above – may many more follow!
“Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak : The Evidence…” Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
November 8, 2020 Wisdom from Courageous – and Silenced – Whistle-blowing “Vaccine Skeptics” (plus a great 1923 poem about the perils of vaccination) Collected from the World-wide Web.
“Mercury/thimerosal and lead (and aluminum) are extremely neurotoxic and cytotoxic, but their combined synergistic effect is much worse. A dose of mercury sufficient to kill 1% of tested rats, when combined with a dose of lead sufficient to kill less than 1% of rats, resulted in killing 100% of rats tested.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/wisdom-whistle-blowing-vaccine-skeptics/5728764
This may be simplistic, naive, or at worse a dumb question/thought…if scientists are seeking long term consequences of vaccines containing mercury & aluminum why not test those of us from GEN X or generation immediately after who had received numerous vaccinations and are now older. These tests would provide long term consequences would they not?
I believe Dr Suzanne Humphries has already demonstrated that the aluminum adjuvant crosses the blood brain barrier with negative affects.