Saturday, July 12, 2025

GET OUR FREE E-NEWSLETTER

“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”

— William Wilberforce

Search

Improving Science & Restoring Trust in Public Health | Jay Bhattacharya, MD

A substantial part of the NIH portfolio, appropriately, focuses on basic science. Basic science meaning fundamental biological facts that can be used in many many drug studies, other research where you don’t necessarily know specifically in advance when you’re doing it what the application’s going to be. The NIH, very appropriately, funds that work, especially work that’s not patentable, because no drug company has an incentive to do that work, and yet it’s vital.

If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.

2 Responses

  1. The two Stanford docs do not restore my trust when they try to rationalize the obscene profits of big pharma with a 30 year old canard, that the high cost of the large scale safety and efficacy studies they are required to conduct raises the ultimate price of the drugs. Those studies are a cost of doing business and are deducted from gross income. The net income after that is still obscene and results from unregulated price gouging.

  2. Don’t trust either of these doctors. Heard them both repeating the propaganda that the C-vac saved lives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search in Archive

Search in Site

To search in site, type your keyword and hit enter

Search
The Vaccine Reaction
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.