Thursday, June 05, 2025

GET OUR FREE E-NEWSLETTER

“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”

— William Wilberforce

Search

COVID-19 Misleading Advertising Campaign Lawsuit Against Pfizer Challenges PREP Act Liability Shield

COVID-19 Misleading Advertising Campaign Lawsuit Against Pfizer Challenges PREP Act Liability Shield

A United States district judge has remanded a lawsuit filed by the state of Kansas against Pfizer, Inc. back to state court. This move may prevent the Public Readiness and Preparedness (PREP) Act from shielding the pharmaceutical giant from liability for Its misleading advertising campaign promoting its mRNA COVID-19 shot (Comirnaty).1

The Kansas attorney general, Kris Kobach, JD, filed a lawsuit against Pfizer in June 2024 under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act. The lawsuit alleges that the pharmaceutical company promoted its Comirnaty COVID biologic using “false, misleading and deceptive” advertising that constituted a “misinformation campaign.”2 The attorney general argues that Pfizer claimed the product was safe for pregnant women and had no risk of myocarditis or pericarditis, which was contrary to evidence revealed in Pfizer’s own internally conducted studies on the mRNA biologic and violated the state’s Consumer Protection Act.3 4

The PREP Act, which went into effect in 2005, was part of a series of federal laws passed by Congress after 9-11 that gave expanded authority to public health officials and expanded liability protection to companies manufacturing and individuals administering vaccines during a public health emergency declaration.5 The PREP Act states that when the Secretary of Health and Human Services declares that a disease, health condition or threat to public health or threat of same constitutes an emergency, the Secretary may recommend the use of one or more countermeasures.6

The PREP Act also provides immunity from liability to “certain individuals and entities against any claim of loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the manufacture, distribution, administration, or use of medical countermeasures, except for claims involving “willful misconduct”.7

PREP Act Doesn’t Shield All Liability

While it provides extensive liability coverage to covered persons for injuries and deaths caused by covered countermeasures, the PREP Act has not proven to be a complete blanket liability shield for pharmaceutical companies. A recent North Carolina Supreme Court found that the PREP Act liability shield is limited to tort claims only and does not necessarily extend to constitutional claims. The court relied on the plain language of the PREP Act to limit its scope because it only covers “claims for losses”.8

A Utah federal court in 2024 upheld a breach of contract claim by a clinical trial participant against the pharmaceutical company, AstraZeneca plc. The court concluded that the case involved a “broken promise, not a countermeasure.”9 10

Pfizer Fails to Move Case to Federal Court

Pfizer attempted to move the false advertising case from state court to federal court, where it would attempt to rely on the PREP Act as a liability shield. Judge Daniel D. Crabtree denied all three of Pfizer’s arguments to remove the case to federal court, effectively blocking Pfizer’s attempt to skirt the state court.11

Pfizer argued that the PREP Act completely preempted state law requiring the case to be moved to federal court. The court rejected this claim and explained that the PREP Act creates two remedies for violations. There is a federal cause of action against covered persons who caused death or serious injury due to willful misconduct, which is a stricter standard compared to negligence. For injuries resulting from actions or inactions other than willful misconduct, the PREP Act establishes a “Covered Countermeasure Process Fund” for “compensation to eligible individuals for covered injuries directly caused by the administration or use of a covered countermeasure pursuant to such declaration.”12

Pfizer argues that the only viable argument for the plaintiffs is the “willful misconduct” claim. The court disagreed and found that plaintiff’s claims were based on deceptive marketing rather than physical injuries or death.

The court concluded:

Plaintiff’s claims aren’t based on any physical injuries or death. They’re based on deceptive marketing, and that point alone ends the debate.13

The PREP Act’s willful misconduct cause of action does not, “vindicate the same basic interest or right that would be vindicated under state law.” Accordingly, removing the case to federal court under the PREP Act would not sufficiently address plaintiff’s claims, therefore, state law is not preempted.14

Commenting on the state court ruling, Ray Flores, senior counsel for Children’s Health Defense, concluded:

This first-of-its-kind ruling declares Pfizer’s deceptions aren’t afforded carte blanche treatment. This decision is important because it creates a viable path for Pfizer to potentially be held accountable for its wrongdoing on a massive scale.15

Attorney General Kobach said:

This victory is the first step in bringing justice to the Kansans who were misled by the false statements made by Pfizer regarding the health risks of its COVID vaccine. The case will now proceed in state court, which is where a claim under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act belongs.16


If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.

Click here to view References:

1 Tohi W. Judge rules Kansas vaccine lawsuit against Pfizer must proceed in state court. Vaccines.News May 16, 2025.
2 Staff at TrialSite. Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Lawsuit Reassigned to Kansas State Court: A Setback for the Pharma Giant and a Test Case for Vaccine Marketing Accountability. Trial Site News May 23, 2025.
3 News Release. Kansas Attorney General wins first battle in lawsuit against Pfizer over Covid Vaccine. Kris Kobach May 14, 2025.
4 Motter S. Case filed against Pfizer for COVID vaccine marketing to be heard at state level. KCTV Kansas City May 21, 2025.
5 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. MCM-Related Counterterrorism Legislation. Apr. 29, 2024.
6 Hendler C. NC Court Rules Federal PREP Act Protects Forced Vaccination Without Parental Consent. The Vaccine Reaction Apr. 8, 2024.
7 Fisher BL, Parpia, R. 2005 PREP Act and 1986 Act Shield Vaccine Manufacturers from Liability. The Vaccine Reaction Aug. 10, 2020.
8 Hendler C. NC Court Rules Federal PREP Act Protects Forced Vaccination Without Parental Consent. The Vaccine Reaction Apr. 8, 2024.
9 Wagner S. AstraZeneca Not Immune from Liability in Vaccine Clinical Trial Case. Nov. 7, 2024.
10 Tohi W. Judge rules Kansas vaccine lawsuit against Pfizer must proceed in state court. Vaccines.News May 16, 2025.
11 State of Kansas v. Pfizer, Inc. Case 6:24-cv-01128-DDC-BGS Document 66 Filed 05/14/25.
12 Ibid.
13 Ibid.
14 Ibid.
15 Tohi W. Judge rules Kansas vaccine lawsuit against Pfizer must proceed in state court. Vaccines.News May 16, 2025.
16 Motter S. Case filed against Pfizer for COVID vaccine marketing to be heard at state level. KCTV Kansas City May 21, 2025.

2 Responses

  1. Good news, somewhat. When do the people at these corporations ever be held personally accountable?

  2. Don’t be too skeptical to take good care of yourself because you heard our Government said there is no cure to Herpes Virus, That was my first thought until I finally met a great herbalist from west Africa Nigeria and his name is Dr Ikpoko on YouTube, THE CAREGIVER, His Herbs 🌿 work very effectively but it has no side effects. All I want you to do is to reach out to him via whatsapp: +2348108298045, [email protected] or visit his website https://drikpoko.wixsite.com/herbs and stop believing in our bad Government because they didn’t want to help us then we need to help ourselves and earlier we realize this and earlier it will be better for us all, HSV have a complete cure because I was cure from this so called Hsv-1 After completing the herbal medication that was ship to me by herbal Dr. Ikpoko on YouTube channel, for three weeks and it has been two months. I have not gotten any symptoms or outbreaks in my body, GLORY to God that he has sent a wonderful and kind hearted man to me in regaining my health back to me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search in Archive

Search in Site

To search in site, type your keyword and hit enter

Search
The Vaccine Reaction
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.