Parents Lose Custody of Baby After Refusing Transfusion Using Blood from Covid Vaccinated Donors

Parents Lose Custody of Baby After Refusing Transfusion Using Blood from Covid Vaccinated Donors

Parents in New Zealand temporarily lost medical custody of their four-month-old son when the Auckland High Court granted temporary medical custody to treating pediatricians after Health New Zealand, which manages the country’s health service and hospitals, took the parents to court seeking guardianship. The parents had refused an operation requiring a blood transfusion for their baby using blood from the New Zealand Blood Service (NZBS) because the blood supply would include blood from donors who had received Covid-19 shots.1

Government health officials and treating pediatricians claimed that the boy has pulmonary valve stenosis, which involves narrowing of the valve between the lower right heart chamber and the lung arteries, and he is in need of immediate surgery. The parents expressed grave concerns about using blood from donors who had received the Covid shots and said they had more than 20 unvaccinated people who agreed to donate blood to their son for the operation. However, the hospital where the operation would be performed insisted on using donor blood provided by NZBS, which does not separate blood taken from vaccinated and unvaccinated donors.2

High Probability Blood Transfusions in New Zealand Contain Blood from Vaccinated Donors

The baby would very likely receive blood from a vaccinated donor as the Covid vaccination rate in New Zealand is very high. About 90 percent of all eligible persons over the age of 12 living in New Zealand have gotten two Covid shots and 70 percent of them have also received a booster dose.3

The father clarified the family’s position…

We don’t want blood that is tainted by vaccination. That’s the end of the deal–we are fine with anything else these doctors want to do.4

The parent’s attorney pointed out that this is not the typical medical guardianship case where parents refuse medical care for their child. Instead in this case,  the parents want what they consider to be superior medical care than what the state can offer their child. Rather than refusing medical care for their child, they are requesting that the child not receive blood from vaccinated donors.5 6

NZBS officials argued that no Covid shot ingredients remain in the blood because the pharmaceutical product is “broken down” when it is introduced to the bloodstream, and it is filtered prior to donation. Despite this claim, NZBS has a 28-day holding period in place after vaccination with certain Covid shots.7 NZBS claim that allowing the parents to use blood from only unvaccinated donors would set a dangerous precedent whereby patients think they have the right to choose blood donors.8

The parent’s relied on an affidavit from Dr. Byram Bridle, who has made the connection between heart inflammation and the mRNA Covid shots. The high court judge Ian Gault decided that the position of the NZBS chief medical officer Dr. Sarah Morley, which was that there is no known evidence of risk associated with receiving a blood transfusion from vaccinated donors, was more persuasive than the parent’s position alleging potential harm.9

Pediatricians Given Temporary Medical Custody of Baby

Judge Gault ruled against the parents and gave temporary medical custody to the baby’s pediatric surgeon and cardiologist in a courtroom packed with interested parties who understood that the ruling will have far-reaching consequences. In a 23-page decision, Judge Gault acknowledged that the parents wanted what was best for their child and had real concerns about the risk to their baby from receiving blood from vaccinated donors, but he concluded that the parents’ desire to establish a separate blood bank with only unvaccinated blood was not practicable and that having the surgery immediately with a blood transfusion using donor blood from NZBS was in the baby’s best interest.10 11

The doctors will maintain medical custody of the infant until after the surgery is complete or until the end of January, whichever occurs first. The doctors were appointed to act as the baby’s legal representative for the purpose of consenting to surgery, while the parents were allowed to retain custody and represent their child for all other purposes. The doctors acknowledged that as long as it did not interfere with what they considered to be in the baby’s best interest, they would take the parent’s wishes into consideration.12

The judge made note of the fact that the baby had previously received a small blood transfusion using blood from the NZBS following a surgical procedure that had been conducted with the parent’s consent. At that time, the parents made it clear that should any more blood products need to be used during a procedure, they would find an alternative to vaccinated blood.13

The high court opinion highlighted the fact that more patients requiring blood transfusions are requesting blood from donors who have not gotten Covid shots. The NZBS has reported that there has been a “significant increase in potential blood recipients asking for blood from unvaccinated donors or asking about directed donation. Similar trends have been noted in other countries.14


If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.

Click here to view References:

1 Baker S. Parents refuse to let their 4-month-old baby get heart surgery if blood is donated by a vaccinated person, saying it would be ‘tainted’. Insider Nov. 30, 2022.
2 Brown J. New Zealand government tries to seize guardianship of baby after parents demand unvaccinated blood for surgery. Fox News Nov. 30, 2022.
3 Mangramo K. New Zealand court takes guardianship of baby after parents refuse vaccinated blood for heart surgery. CNN Dec. 7, 2022.
4 Brown J. New Zealand government tries to seize guardianship of baby after parents demand unvaccinated blood for surgery. Fox News Nov. 30, 2022.
5 Ibid.
6 Keane I. Parents refuse 4-month-old’s life-saving surgery if donor’s blood ‘tainted by vaccination’. New York Post Nov. 30, 2022.
7 Brown J. New Zealand government tries to seize guardianship of baby after parents demand unvaccinated blood for surgery. Fox News Nov. 30, 2022.
8 Corlett E. Parents who refused ‘vaccinated blood’ transfusion speak out after court places Baby W in care. The Guardian Dec. 7, 2022.
9 Block G. Baby blood donor vaccine battle: Judge rules in favour of Te Whatu Ora, child placed under court’s guardianship for surgery. New Zealand Herald Dec. 7, 2022.
10 Ibid.
11 Corlett E. Parents who refused ‘vaccinated blood’ transfusion speak out after court places Baby W in care. The Guardian Dec. 7, 2022.
12 Pietsch B. New Zealand takes custody of baby whose parents refused ‘vaccinated blood’. The Washington Post Dec. 8, 2022.
13 Block G. Baby blood donor vaccine battle: Judge rules in favour of Te Whatu Ora, child placed under court’s guardianship for surgery. New Zealand Herald Dec. 7, 2022.
14 Corlett E. Parents who refused ‘vaccinated blood’ transfusion speak out after court places Baby W in care. The Guardian Dec. 7, 2022.

14 Responses to "Parents Lose Custody of Baby After Refusing Transfusion Using Blood from Covid Vaccinated Donors"

  1. Donna   December 19, 2022 at 4:18 pm

    So we now need to hide our children from our own government?

    Reply
  2. Colorado   December 19, 2022 at 5:24 pm

    Won’t be long now before the vaccinated whom fall ill will seek out unvaccinated blood just in a desperate attempt to stay alive. And no, it would not create undue management concerns to simply sort out and record if blood is from vaxxed or not.

    You know the old scientific analysis mantra; you can’t measure what you do not observe. Wouldn’t it be something if we soon find out that vaccinated blood actually causes more harm? It’s no wonder that trust in the industrial medical establishment is failing.

    We’re sorry to report, we can not boycott vaccines twice. Many have provided valid disclosures and data for the past 20+ years if not longer, as our voices were silenced or shouted over by industry propaganda. Nobody would have gone for this massive expansion in vaccination schedules and lackluster safety approaches if they had to pay for this out of their own pocket. American medical systems are compromised by insurers and corporations whom do not prioritize health first. Get your mind around this, because it’s a fact. No means no and it does not mean anything else. You can’t inject health. Real health happens in the gym, and in the kitchen. Choose wisely.

    Reply
    • Donna   December 20, 2022 at 2:27 am

      Just another method of vaccinating the unvaxxed.

      Reply
    • Harold H.   December 29, 2022 at 11:21 am

      Just another example of government, pharmaceuticals, medical establishments, courts thinking they know best and have all the answers. They’ve been proven wrong but still insist their right. We, the citizen, are slowly loosing any rights we many have left.

      Reply
  3. Fowell the $   December 19, 2022 at 7:30 pm

    Autologous blood donation.
    Store you’re own blood.
    You body can recover in 30 days.
    The case came Nov 30 and the surgery will be finished by end of January.
    62 days max.
    Enough time to store 2 unit of blood max.
    More reasonable 1 unit.

    Reply
    • Harold H.   December 29, 2022 at 11:18 am

      Just another example of government, pharmaceuticals, medical establishments, courts thinking they know best and have all the answers. They’ve been proven wrong but still insist their right. We, the citizen, are slowly loosing any rights we many have left.

      Reply
  4. Al   December 19, 2022 at 9:41 pm

    Criminal!!

    Reply
  5. Frank   December 20, 2022 at 9:25 am

    This is getting out of control!! It has been proven that the vaccination does absolutely nothing to stop anyone from getting sick. I work in a nursing home and we just had an outbreak this past month. Out of the 60 pts that got sick 59 of them were vaccinated, one wasn’t and he was no worse than the others that were vax’ed. So they can’t even use that BS line anymore! Maybe the initial strain but not this one. It’s a cold at this point so these drastic measures being imposed on people are just ridiculous!! Not one death out of 60 patients and all over the age of 80. This non sense has to stop!!

    Reply
  6. Fowell the $   December 20, 2022 at 5:37 pm

    Do new Zealand patents have 0 rights?
    What I wanted my brother to eat organic food? Could I bring organic food to feed my brother?

    Than why not give my child organic uncontaminated blood?

    Reply
    • Bill   December 21, 2022 at 4:29 pm

      “Do new Zealand patents have 0 rights?”
      No. NZ is ruled by a tyrannical globalist prime minister who believes in zero covid or the next best thing. Would never live there.

      Reply
  7. Eker   December 20, 2022 at 11:54 pm

    Colorado–you have seen the remakes of Mad Max..? Predictive programming.

    Reply
  8. Bill   December 21, 2022 at 4:33 pm

    “NZBS officials argued that no COVID shot ingredients remain in the blood because the pharmaceutical product is “broken down” when it is introduced to the bloodstream”

    That is malarkey. The spike protein is spread throughout the body. Is the ruling judge also a vaccine expert?

    Reply
  9. ciril sqiril   December 29, 2022 at 12:57 pm

    The spike protein is spread throughout the body. Is the ruling judge also a vaccine expert?
    the fauci patent for covid 19 (gain of function version) is not natural in nature there fore patentable the fauci patent for covid 19 and the vaccine IBM controls patent office in USA have sealed for 75years and stated trade secret written on the patent

    Reply
  10. ciril   December 29, 2022 at 1:03 pm

    how can the NZBS new zealand blood service filter the blood they do not know what they r looking for it ios unknown as the patent is sealed for 75 years and the nz government voted that no government department is required to disclose the vaccine ingredients for 75 years ,, and all politicians and crtical staff all heads of departments and critical staff (critical staff act )the commissioner of police and a determined number of ranks directly below police head r exempt from the vaccine

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.