Study: Natural Immunity Offers More Protection Than Three mRNA COVID Shots

Study: Natural Immunity Offers More Protection Than Three mRNA COVID Shots

As the debate continues surrounding the issue of bodily autonomy being violated by school and workplace COVID-19 vaccine mandates, a new research study that analyzed more than one million people has found that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 offers longer lasting protection than vaccination.1 The study, which was published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), found that vaccine-induced artificial immunity waned rapidly, whereas individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infections were moderately protected from the Omicron strain with little decline in protection even a year after infection.2

The case-control analysis found that a combination of full vaccination and prior infection was maximally protective. However, the study found that three doses of Pfizer’s Comirnaty or Moderna’s Spikevax messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID biologics offered no significant protection against infection with the SARS-CoV-2 variant, Omicron.2

FDA to Use Mice Instead of Humans to Approve Boosters

The NEJM study was released in June 2022 Meanwhile, media outlets are reporting that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is expected to grant Pfizer and Moderna an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to distribute their Omicron booster shots the week of Labor Day, which reportedly offers protection against the BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants.3 The FDA is utilizing a controversial strategy to evaluate the boosters, relying on old testing data using mice instead of data from human clinical trials for the first time.4 Pfizer’s new COVID booster shot is being approved under an EUA for those aged 12 years and older, while Moderna’s shot is approved for adults.

Weill Cornell Medicine immunologist John Moore, PhD stated:

For the FDA to rely on mouse data is just bizarre, in my opinion. Mouse data are not going to be predictive in any way of what you would see in humans.4

Others argue that the U.S. has had enough experience with the safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines in humans and that “there’s not enough time to wait for data from human studies.”4

Other Studies Demonstrate Natural Immunity is More Robust

More than a dozen additional studies have demonstrated the power of the human immune system, finding that natural immunity offered greater protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection.1 Perhaps the most well-known of these was a study out of Israel published in 2021,  which examined the medical records of tens of thousands of Israelis and found o that individuals with prior infection were less likely to get the Delta variant and more thoroughly protected.5 Israel is one of the most highly vaccinated countries in the world.

Upon publication of the NEJM study, U.S. Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky tweeted:

Among the most fraudulent messages of the CDC’s campaign of deceit is to force the vaccine on those with prior infection, who have a greater degree of protection against all versions of the virus than those with any of the vaccines.1

COVID Boosters Developed by Guessing the Upcoming Strain

Scientists believe that the future of COVID vaccine development may be similar to influenza vaccines, which are changed yearly in a best-guess attempt by public health officials to match the seasonal influenza vaccine to strains that are likely to be circulating.6 It was once believed that flu vaccine efficacy was 70-90 percent. However, those studies were later found to only have measured the initial antibody spike after vaccination, which did not always confer long lasting artificial immunity. More accurate flu vaccine efficacy numbers range anywhere from 10 to 60 percent, depending on the year.7

In an article describing why flu vaccines are “lackluster” and so often fail, the journal Science writes:

They’re learning instead that the vaccine may falter even when the right strains were used to make it, perhaps because of how it is produced or quirks of individual immune systems. It’s much more complicated than we thought.7


If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.

Click here to view References:

13 Responses to "Study: Natural Immunity Offers More Protection Than Three mRNA COVID Shots"

  1. Donna   August 30, 2022 at 10:09 am

    What if Covid was a bioweapon, rather than a virus? What if immunity is a non-factor to whether or not you are going to be affected? Poisons, or bioweapons, are not affected by the body’s “immunity”. Just as with poisons, not everyone who is poisoned reacts similarly. So those of us not showing symptoms are not being protected by our immune system, but just our different reaction to a poison.

    Reply
  2. Steve Sanborn   August 30, 2022 at 10:44 am

    “Natural Immunity Offers More Protection Than Three mRNA COVID Shots”.
    I don’t think that the vaccines offer ANY protection from the virus and most likely cause damage to the immune system which leaves people open to more illnesses.
    ‘Oh , what a tangled web they wove’.

    Reply
    • Louise Gallagher   August 31, 2022 at 9:48 pm

      I agree with you. Those damn shots offer (if at all) minimal protection while destroying the immune system. What people fail to remember is that long after the shots are in the past, the damage continues as the spike protein continues to replicate in the body. We haven’t begun to see the fallout from those shots.

      Reply
  3. Colorado   August 30, 2022 at 11:35 am

    “Guessing based on the upcoming strain.” Who’s still buying these tired old lines and deceptive practices? This is exactly the same flimsy argument used to hold up the illusionary need for a yearly flue shot. And where did the flue go anyways? Can’t you people see it’s all a corporate game for insurance dollars and tax dollars? It’s all a complete waste of human energy and man power which runs counter productive to the betterment of society. Every last dollar and every last minute they waste on vaccine technology does more harm than good. There is nothing bizarre or confusing about it. Pharmaceutical companies have turned into scam artists for subsidy dollars. And good luck getting any of these messages out to all the doctors whom read the medical journals owned by said same corporations. There is no longer an effective check to balance in the medical community. They run roughshaw and do what they want, effectively above the law. Consume their products at your own risk, and peril.

    And you know what else; I told you so. I told you so. Courtesy of Conspiracy Guru. Remember when I told you about 911. Remember when I told you about building 7. Remember when I told you about fluoride in the water, yes I did. Remember when I told you about the new world order. Remember that! Remember when I told you about chemtrails in the sky. Remember when I told you nasa was full of lies. Remember when I told you about the ultra mind kontrol? Well I just want to say I told you so. Remember when I told you about 432 hertz, of what 440 can do to you. Remember when I told you about the vaccine agenda. The dinosaur fraud, the climate change scam. Remember when I told you there aint no globe. Well I just want to say, I told you so. Remember when I told you about the tv flicker rate, how it puts your brain in an alpha state. Remember when I told you about germ theory. Remember when I told you about gravity. Remember when I told you about direct energy. Remember when I told you about monsanto. Well I just want to say I told you so. Remember when I told you about mainstream media. Remember when I told you about the georgia guidestones. Remember when I told you about false flag operations. Remember when I told you about 5g radiation. Remember when I told you that covid was a hoax? Well, I Told You So. But you didn’t listen. I told you so.

    Reply
  4. bmc redirect   August 30, 2022 at 12:12 pm

    Although I appreciate all NVIC’s technical efforts in reporting “scientific data,” we have all come to a time when any and all authorities, especially governmental, cannot be trusted and the internet sources cannot be believed.

    Where does that leave us? Personal experiential and relative anecdotal data, and the Grace of God by which to be guided and live.

    Be Well.

    FREEDOM OF VACCINATION CHOICE, NO . . . MATTER . . WHAT.

    Reply
  5. Tom   August 30, 2022 at 3:06 pm

    We cannot know at any time what anyone’s natural immunity might be to anything. Many of the things (viruses, diseases, etc) may not even exist as we are told so immunity may be something different all together. I do not believe in germ theory so immunity is not easily determined. We may appear to be sick, diseased or ill in relation to the toxicity we present in out bodies. The numbers and amounts of toxins in the world are all trying to take us out or permanently damage us.

    Reply
  6. Grace   August 30, 2022 at 4:03 pm

    Agreed Colorado

    Reply
  7. Frances Lilian Wellington   August 30, 2022 at 4:47 pm

    I’m data driven. Naturally resistant to infection from respiratory viruses since January 2019. Experienced 2 viruses each year since then, as usual, but with zero infection for 3.5 years now. Why? = Optimised Nutrition Intake (ONI) tracked using Chronometer software to targetted levels. Easy. Effective. Reliable. Bingo❣️

    Reply
  8. Data Detective   August 31, 2022 at 2:35 am

    Mice can live 5 year with shelter and diet. In 5 years we can tell if the ☣️💉 mice die sooner than 🚫💉 mice.
    I will wait.
    “We have enough safe and effective data with humans from study’s”
    I agree their is enough data to show that COVID vaccine cause more harm than good.
    STOP ☣️💉☠️🚑⚰️.!

    https://pandemictimeline.com/2021/11/Pfizer-publishes-its-6-month-review/

    Reply
  9. Fowell the $   August 31, 2022 at 6:50 pm

    I just heard on News today .
    FDA approved new booster 💉 for adults that already have ☣️💉☣️💉.
    Over 18 years for moderna , over 12 years for Pfizer.

    Why take the original ☣️💉☣️💉.
    When we know ‘orignal ☣️💉☣️💉offer no significant protection ‘ .

    When will FDA change to offer new ☣️💉 to people with out ☣️💉☣️💉.?

    Reply
  10. Gary walsh   August 31, 2022 at 10:11 pm

    To borrow S. Sanborn’s previous ~’ tangled web they wove’. That’s it. Mostly. Smother the medics, enrol the media ‘n lock them down. Much more.The critical strand was to ban and debase all best working medication. Effectively ensure non use of the hypocratic oath. Nullify all opposition and pump in the fear.Keep them blindflded. Simple really.
    So here we are, like frightened rabbits, squabbling and passing around a filthy govt.syringe. If the truth wasn’t buried we wouldn’t be here. Yet many can yet still not see this..Unban the Right stuff.

    Reply
  11. Peace   September 1, 2022 at 9:51 pm

    Using mice to approve booster shots is equivalent to third rate science. I’m highly skeptical that booster shots would give enough data of the efficacy and safety on humans if they only test mice. Natural immunity is a big gift. Take a good look at Rand Paul for instance. Did he ever been reinfected? I honestly don’t know, but I doubt he got Covid again.

    Dr. Fauci- did he ever get the infection? Yes, he got Covid in spite of 4 total vaccines if I remember correctly. There are politicians out there got Covid in spite of 4 vaccines as well. So is president Biden. Can you see the common thread???

    I’m speaking up AGAINST vaccine mandates.

    Reply
  12. António José da Costa Maya   September 7, 2022 at 7:55 pm

    There is a prior question to experimental genetic inoculation (I do not call it a vaccine) and which is at the base of this worldwide fraud.

    It is the question of the fatal uselessness of RT-PCR tests, proved in external peer review, whose conclusions, from its report, dated November 27, 2020 (ten months after the beginning of the “pandemic”), are categorical and undeniable, report signed by an international consortium of 22 scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS) convened to examine the merit and usefulness attributed to the PCR test by its producers, Victor Corman and Christian Drosten.

    The 22 scientists are peremptory and unanimous in classifying the PCR test as USELESS (sic), to detect SARS-CoV-2 and USELESS for the diagnosis of covid-19 (contrary to what its producers promised), for revealing 10 major flaws. scientific findings at the molecular and methodological level, with consequences for results of 97% of FALSE POSITIVES.

    False positives that are from healthy people, not from asymptomatic patients!

    It is unfortunate and unbelievable that the «Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020, of 27 November, curated by an International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS)», an official and scientific document, available on the Internet since the end of November 2020, is “hidden” from the public by the highest authorities officially involved in tackling the health crisis, from monarchs and presidents of countries, Parliaments, prime ministers, councils of ministers, ministries of health, defense, national health services, orders of doctors, pharmacists, nurses, lawyers, the armed or police forces, media and their commentators, who never mentioned it, never communicated it, never even criticized it, quite simply, omit it!

    It is also regrettable and without any ethical sense that the Presidents of the countries, the heads of governments, the Ministries of Health and the National Health Services will shamelessly seek and ask organizations with lobbies and direct links to large pharmaceutical industries (as in the case of INFARMED in Portugal) for advice on the “pandemic”, which are the den of pharmaceutical lobbies, when they know in advance that the advice will always be to test, test and test, so they can sell tests by the billions, and confine, coerce, intend to force the “vaccine” to sell them in the millions, when they could and should have request for further information and advice on the “pandemic”, free from conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical companies, at the National Health Council, “which, in Portugal, is the Government’s independent advisory body, composed of 30 members, which guarantees the participation of the various scientific forces, social, cultural and economic, in the search for broad consensus regarding health policy” and they did not want to do so!

    INFARMED and the big pharmaceutical industries thanks them, because with the advice requested from its people, the governments ended up “put the fox taking care of the chicken coop”!
    In 2021, Pfizer alone doubled its profits from the previous year, to 82 billion euros!!!

    As of November 27, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO), based on the findings of the Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020, of 27 November, (which no one will believe that was unaware of it) was supposed to declare the end of the pandemic, and it didn’t!
    The scientific report reads: “These are serious design errors, as the test cannot discriminate between the entire virus and viral fragments. The PCR test cannot be used as a diagnostic for SARS virus.”

    “In light of our re-examination of the testing protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper, we have identified serious errors and inherent fallacies that render the SARS-CoV-2 test useless.”

    «CONCLUSION (from the report): The decision on which test protocols are published and made widely available is directly in the hands of Eurosurveillance. The decision to acknowledge the errors contained in Corman-Drosten’s paper has the benefit of greatly minimizing the cost and human suffering going forward. Is it not in Eurosurveillance’s best interest to withdraw this article? Our conclusion is clear. In view of all the tremendous flaws and design errors of the PCR protocols described here, we conclude: There is not much choice within the framework of scientific integrity and accountability».

    Having been appointed COVID-adviser to Chancellor Angela Merkel, Drosten successfully pressured the German interior minister to inflate the number of contagions, in order to create maximum terror and fear and broaden a view of non-existent danger, while insisting on the fraudulent massive testing and selling useless PCR tests.

    The consortium of scientists sent a letter, addressed to Drosten and his partners, annexed to the review report, in which they asked them to retract the ten fatal errors and to desist from the fraudulent activity of distributing and selling a useless product, based on which the WHO had wrongly substantiated and declared the pandemic.

    The letter, signed by all 22 Life Science scientists and attached to the report, ends as follows: “We are confident that you will take our scientific objections seriously and recognize that there is no alternative but to accept our request to withdraw the Corman-Drosten document».

    Unfortunately for the entire world, neither Drosten nor his partners wanted to recognize the errors contained in the PCR, they continued (and continue) their criminal activities and forced the 22 scientists to resort to justice through a criminal process, in which they are accused of fraud with the use of useless tests to justify and prolong a false pandemic and crimes against humanity for the incalculable harmful consequences caused in practically every country in the world.

    If the WHO, after the date of publication of this report (27 Nov 2020) had put an end to the fraud, the COVID vaccination program would not even have started, which could call into question the action of its director-general Tedros Ghebreyesus and raise doubts about their relationships and the organization’s behavior, with regard to toxic relationships with investors, as is the case with Bill Gates and his foundation, who made the WHO a means of propagating fraud with the fake pandemic based on tests, scientific and demonstrably, useless, and a global dictator organism of experimental genetic inoculations, which make it even richer and more responsible for the ongoing depopulation genocide.

    For, if the PCR tests do not diagnose covid-19, nor detect the Chinese coronavirus, how is it possible to evoke a pandemic based on them? And, if there is not, nor was there a pandemic – as the 22 wise men certify us without expressly saying so – then what are the “vaccines” for, those genetic laboratory experiments, only allowed by the state of emergency due to a non-existent pandemic, experiments that make of human guinea pigs and that cause so much permanent, irreversible and increasingly lethal damage.

    What kind of medicine is this, what science is this, what scientists and what doctors are these who, knowing all this – as they know – decide to inoculate everyone, from children aged 5 to 11, and adults, especially from 60 years of age?

    Here is an illuminating example of good and bad science practice, which shows the difference between scientists in the Life Sciences and scientists in the Death Sciences.

    Text by António José Maya
    13 August 2022

    Documents:

    (Portuguese translation of the original)
    Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020. 27 November. Iron & Fire. 27 November 2020
    https://www.iron-and-fire.com/relatorio-dos-testes-pcr-de-27-de-novembro-de-2020/

    Letter of Cease and Desist from criminal activity sent to Christian Drosten, Covid advisor at Merkel, by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich.
    Anonymous, Just Paste.it, 5 February 2021
    https://justpaste.it/7cruw

    (Original documents in English)
    Corman-Drosten Review Report curated by an International Consortium of Scientists in the Life Sciences (ICSLS). 27 Nov 2020
    https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/

    Corman-Drosten Review Report curated by an international consortium of scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS) [NOV 2020 – JAN 2021]. Retraction request letter to Eurosurveillance editorial board.
    November 28, 2020
    https://cormandrostenreview.com/retraction-request-letter-to-eurosurveillance-editorial-board/

    Pharmaceutical producers of covid vaccines (Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson), Bill and Melinda Gates, Dr. Fauci, Covid advisor to Trump and Biden, Boris Johnson, British Prime Minister, TEDROS GHEBREYESUS, from WHO, Rajiv Shah of the Rockefeller Foundation, Klaus Schwab, of the WEF and others, accused of crimes of genocide and crimes against humanity in complaint before the International Criminal Court.
    By Patricia Harrity on December 10, 2021 (242 comments)
    https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/10/uk-team-file-complaint-of-crimes-against-humanity-with-the-international-criminal-court/comment-page-2/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.