A U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report1 on pregnancy and SARS-CoV-2 infection released on June 26 suggested that pregnant women may be at increased risk for COVID-19 complications. The report was followed by a statement issued by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)2 urging that pregnant and lactating women be included in COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutics trials and that pregnant women be among the first to get the vaccine after it is licensed.
Pregnant Women Report Fewer COVID-19 Symptoms
The CDC reported that the government’s COVID-19 surveillance program has received reports of 326,335 women of reproductive age (15-44 years) who had positive rest results for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Data on pregnancy status was available for 29 percent of the women, and among these, 9 percent were pregnant.
Symptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women reported similar frequencies of cough and shortness of breath during COVID-19 infections. However, pregnant women less frequently reported headache, muscle aches, fever, chills, and diarrhea.3
Chronic Conditions Reported During COVID-19 Infections May Be Pregnancy Related
Chronic lung disease, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease were reported among pregnant women at roughly twice the rate of those who were not pregnant. However, data was not available to distinguish whether chronic conditions were present before or were uniquely associated with pregnancy (e.g. gestational diabetes or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy).4
More Pregnant Women Admitted to Hospital and ICU for COVID-19 But Death Rates Identical Between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women
Approximately one third (31.5 percent) of pregnant women were hospitalized compared with 5.6 percent of non-pregnant women. However data were not available to distinguish hospitalization of women for COVID-19 related circumstances from hospital admission for pregnancy-related treatment or procedures, including birthing.
After adjusting for age, presence of underlying conditions and race/ethnicity, pregnant women were 1.5 times more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and receive mechanical ventilation during COVID-19 infections. Risk of death for the pregnant and non-pregnant women was identical (0.2 percent).5
The CDC data indicates that Hispanic and black women may be disproportionately more likely to suffer complications from SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, which reflects an overall increased risk for COVID-19 complications in Hispanic and black populations in the U.S.6
Limitations of CDC study on COVID-19 in Pregnant Women
CDC officials acknowledged at least four limitations to their report, which include missing data, insufficient time for accurate outcomes, lack of data on trimester of pregnancy at the time of infection and whether the hospitalization was related to pregnancy conditions rather than for COVID-19 illness, and no data on pregnancy or birth outcomes such as pregnancy loss or preterm birth.7
COVID-19 Pregnancy Registries Seek Answers
ACOG represents more than 60,000 physician obstetricians/gynecologists in the U.S.8 In response to the CDC report, the ACOG released a statement advising member physicians of the increased risk to pregnant women of COVID-19 infections. ACOG urged its members to encourage pregnant patients testing positive for COVID-19 to enroll in a COVID-19 registry to help gather more data measuring the impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes.9
In April, UCLA Health and the University of San Francisco launched a nationwide registry called PRIORITY (Pregnancy CoRonavIrus Outcomes RegIsTrY) to study how COVID-19 impacts pregnant women and their newborns. Researchers will collect data throughout pregnancy, then track the new mothers and babies for up to one year.
“The issue is we don’t have data in pregnancy. A lot of this data is extrapolated from other SARS infection, MERS, and non-pregnant individuals,” says Yalda Afshar, MD, assistant professor in the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine at UCLA Health.10
In May, the PRIORITY study launched the Reproductive Health Equity and Birth Justice Core to focus on the impact of COVID-19 on Black, Indigenous, and People of Color communities.11 Other COVID-19 pregnancy registries include COVI-Preg, a global collaboration between 198 antenatal clinics from 23 countries,12 the International Registry of Coronavirus Exposure in Pregnancy (IRCEP), and Coronavirus Health Outcomes in Pregnancy and Neonates (CHOPAN) in Australia.
ACOG Says Pregnant Women, Breastfeeding Moms Should Be Test Subjects in COVID-19 Vaccine Trials and Be Among the First to Get Vaccinated
In its June 24 statement, the ACOG also stated:
In light of this new information from the CDC regarding the risk to pregnant patients, it is even more concerning that pregnant and lactating patients have been excluded from clinical trials for a coronavirus vaccine. The new information from the CDC highlights the importance of pregnant patients being prioritized for a coronavirus vaccine once it becomes available. ACOG again urges the federal government to use its resources to ensure the safe inclusion of pregnant and lactating patients, including patients of color, in trials for vaccines and therapeutics to ensure that all populations are included in the search for ways to prevent and treat COVID-19.13
Questions About Safety of Vaccination During Pregnancy
The time-honored rule of avoiding any potential toxic exposure that might interfere with the normal development of the fetus was suspended and replaced by the CDC in 2006 with an assumption that vaccination during pregnancy was safe after the CDC strengthened recommendations that all pregnant women, healthy or not, should get influenza vaccine during in any trimester. This CDC recommendation was followed up in 2011 with another new one directing obstetricians and gynecologists to administer a pertussis containing Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis) shot to all pregnant women during every pregnancy.14 15
Influenza and Tdap vaccines were formerly categorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as Pregnancy Category B and C biologicals because it is not known whether they are genotoxic and can cause fetal harm or can affect maternal fertility and reproduction.16 Influenza and pertussis containing Tdap vaccines were not tested in or licensed for use in pregnant women prior to the CDC’s recommendation for their use by all pregnant women, and their use has been considered “off label” during pregnancy.17
The text of one vaccine manufacturer’s prescribing information for the use of Tdap vaccine in pregnant women highlights a critical lack of knowledge about the potential negative biological effects of pertussis containing Tdap vaccine on the pregnant woman and her fetus, which appears to be common for vaccines administered to pregnant women:
Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Adacel vaccine. It is also not known whether Adacel vaccine can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity.” In addition, the following language is common in most vaccine manufacturer prescribing information inserts: “Adacel vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic, mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.18
About 35 Percent of Women in U.S. Get Vaccinated During Pregnancy
Barbara Loe Fisher, cofounder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) states, “The rush to vaccinate pregnant women and reach into the womb to try to passively vaccinate the developing fetus is a clear case of policy preceding science.”19
A 2019 report by the CDC found that 35 percent of women received both influenza and pertussis containing Tdap vaccines during pregnancy. Anne Schuchat, MD, principal deputy director of the CDC states that for any woman wary of getting vaccinated, “it’s been proven repeatedly that these vaccinations are safe for pregnant women and their developing babies.”20
Civil Liability Waiver Encourages Pharmaceutical Companies to Test Experimental Vaccines on Pregnant Women
The 21st Century Cures Act passed by Congress and signed into law in 2016 amended the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 to give vaccine manufacturers a product liability shield so they can’t be sued in civil court when there is evidence that a federally FDA licensed vaccine (or vaccines) recommended by the CDC for pregnant women injured or caused the death of a woman or an infant born alive who was injured in the womb by a vaccine administered to the infant’s mother.
The fact that commercial pharmaceutical companies producing vaccine products are no longer legally liable for harm caused to pregnant women or their infants during gestation if they are born alive, becomes even more significant as COVID-19 vaccines using experimental mRNA and DNA technology are being fast tracked to market.21 As pointed out in a 2017 review of ethical issues involved in vaccine research on pregnant women:
“As a fetus or infant cannot consent to participation in research, a critical issue is how much risk is acceptable to impose upon the fetus or the infant. For research with the potential of direct medical benefit to the woman or fetus, risk proportionate to the potential benefit is acceptable. For research that does not involve the prospect of direct medical benefit, risk to the fetus must be no more than minimal. However, the definitions of minimal risk in the context of pregnancy are unclear.”
Big Gaps in Vaccine Safety Research and Knowledge Concerning for Pregnant Women
In a response to the FDA’s 2018 proposed guidance for scientific and ethical consideration for inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials, Barbara Loe Fisher and Theresa Wrangham on behalf of the National Vaccine Information Center submitted a public comment and noted the “lack of basic understanding of the biological mechanisms and high risk factors for vaccine injury and death in individuals who are not pregnant hampers the ability to design ethical research into the biological effects of vaccination in pregnant women. The lack of published biological mechanism studies and well-designed prospective case controlled studies that assess immune and brain function and genetic integrity before and after adults or children are vaccinated is of great concern to those being directed to receive all federally recommended vaccines. That justifiable concern is magnified when it comes to the potential adverse effects of vaccination on pregnant women and their unborn infants developing in the womb.”22
Fisher observed that, “This maternal vaccination policy is a violation of the precautionary principle to “first, do no harm,” and warned “it is of grave concern to women having babies in America.”23
1 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Characteristics of Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status—United States, January 22-June 7, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report June 26, 2020.
2 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Statement on COVID-19 and Pregnancy. June 24, 2020.
3 CDC. Characteristics of Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status—United States, January 22-June 7, 2020 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report June 26, 2020.
6 CDC. COVID-19 in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups. June 25, 2020.
7 See Footnote 3.
8 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. About Us. 2020.
9 See Footnote 2.
10 WBBJ Eyewitness News. Researchers seek COVID-19 effects on pregnancy. Apr. 20, 2020.
11 University of California – San Francisco. PRIORITY Study Reproductive Health Equity & Birth Justice Core.
12 Advances in Surgery. COVI-Preg, a structured data collection tool available to any facility accessing pregnant patients for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Apr.28, 2020.
13 See Footnote 2.
14 Fisher BL. Vaccination During Pregnancy: Is It Safe? NVIC Newsletter Nov. 9, 2013.
15 CDC. Vaccines During and After Pregnancy. Dec. 16, 2019.
16 Fisher BL. FDA Prepares to Fast Track New Vaccines Targeting Pregnant Women. National Vaccine Information Center Nov. 17, 2015.
17 See Footnote 14.
18 Fisher BL, Wrangam TK. Written Comment on 83 FR 15161, Docket No. FDA-2018-D-1201 – “Pregnant Women: Scientific and Ethical Considerations for Inclusion in Clinical Trials; Draft Guidance; Availability National Vaccine Information Center June 8, 2018.
19 See Footnote 14.
20 Preidt R. Only a Third of Pregnant Women Get Needed Vaccines. WebMD Oct 8, 2019.
21 Fisher BL. COVID-19 Meltdown and Pharma’s Big Money Win: DNA and mRNA Vaccines: Flying Blind Into Uncharted Territory. NVIC Newsletter Apr. 1, 2020.
22 See Footnote 18.
23 See Footnote 16.
Pregnant and nursing mothers should NEVER be vaccinated, especially against their will. Neither should anyone else.
yes i agree
To Anonymous I agree 100%!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just the latest in the ACOG justifying its meddling in the 85% of births which do NOT need surgical assistance for the profit of the hospitals which employ them. Only to be expected as long as maternity “care” is a for-profit industry and the foxes are “guarding” the henhouse.
yes i agree
This is a most solipsistic and demonstrable robotian response from OB-GYN providers suffering from their yet, diagnosed viral infestation with the ICVK positive-sense, enveloped, single-stand RNA virus, belonging to the Ignorales family. Every vaccine is an “experimental” pharmaceutical drug without quality (efficacy and safety parameters), and as such, is unconstitutional in its recommended observance and a definite fracturing of the Informed Consent common-denominator listed in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. Informed Consent is the foundation of Ethical Medicine, and without its adherence, there is left only medical tyranny and patient trauma. This is a “no go.”
Let all the OB/GYNs get tested first, not the mothers
So basically, their data mean absolutely nothing and there’s no reason to even be having this conversation. It looks like to me they’re just coming after babies one more way. If they can’t get them through abortion birth control and as infants by killing them off with vaccines after birth, then they’ll just kill them off inside their mothers with vaccines! Two birds with one stone, as they say. Wickedness.
yup, these people have no regard for humanity, only money and control.
Whoever the people are that think up this psycopathic nonsense must surely be oxygen-deprived — from wearing a stupid mask!
Future lifelong customers – the mother AND her babies! Pharma ?
Should never be done. Ever.
This is my message to ALL doctors and the lying scum politicians of both parties – You and your family first!
Then let’s wait for a year and see what happens. But make damn sure they get the vaccine and not a placebo or other innocuous injection.
Evil ACOG supports abortion on demand. They are largely responsible for our abortion holocaust since they tolerate abortionists in their ranks. Abortionists should be stripped of their licenses and prosecuted for crimes against humanity. Any organization that supports vaccination of pregnant mothers should likewise be prosecuted for crimes against humanity. In addition to this, ACOG supports many methods that interfere with the natural birthing process and cause irreparable harm to both mother and baby, and are behind the butchery of women in unnecessary Caesarean sections. Their interference includes harm to bonding between mother and baby, which can have repercussions for both for decades, not to mention it makes the task of raising responsible children much more difficult.
We need to eliminate ACOG.
Anyone following the vaccine news, knows this is a terrible, terrible idea!! I can’t believe it is even suggested. Testing vaccines THAT ARE NOT TESTED/TRIALED?? On pregnant and nursing women? So infect/harm not one, but two people?
Vaccines do NOT have to be tested, thanks to Big Pharma. This literally makes me sick. No covid vaccine for me, ever. Covid is a kind of flu, ever mutating, so they will never be able to develop a vaccine for it.
Guess they found a new way to make for spontaneous abortions!
Sure, let’s inject toxic chemicals into a pregnant woman. What could go wrong?
Giving ANY vaccine to pregnant women is inexcusable. There is no way of knowing how it will affect the fetus.
I heard that many pregnant women who received the H1N1(swine flu) vaccine that was being given in about 2009 had miscarriages.
In the 1960’s docs had no problem with their patients enjoying martinis and cigarettes while pregnant. 2020 docs want experimental vaccines for their pregnant patients. Translation – run away from the doctors!
This is insane!
May 12, 2020 BGPuppetShot
Once upon a time, I worked in a lab in the Vaccine Center of a major university’s human health research lab. The PhD Biologist at the next desk told me “you should never agree to any vaccine in its first 5 years of release. It’s not really tested until then.”
suicide…part of their toxic cocktail they do already with vaccines…induction drugs…cesareans…another way of killing us off…