Sunday, April 21, 2024


“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”

— William Wilberforce


Skin Inflammation in Elderly Obstructs Vaccine Efficacy

elderly hands

Story Highlights

  • It is known that people over 65 do not respond well to vaccination because aging immune systems do not mount a robust immune response to pathogens.
  • A 2018 study showed that that an excessive inflammatory response at the skin level in elderly patients obstructs immune system function and diminishes a vaccine’s efficacy.
  • The study suggests that to improve vaccine effectiveness elderly patients should take anti-inflammatory pills prior to vaccination.

A study published in 2018 in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology found that an excessive inflammatory response at the skin level (cutaneous immunity) in older people can obstruct the immune system’s response to a vaccine.1

It has been long recognized that elderly people do not respond well to vaccination as a whole because aging immune systems often do not mount a robust response to challenge from natural pathogens or vaccines.2

Dr. Arne Akbar, a senior coauthor of the study states, “We know that the immune system declines with age, and people can be affected by pathogens they were once immune to. We found that when it comes to cutaneous immunity—specific to skin—the immune system was being obstructed by skin cells that were too prone to producing inflammation responses. We’ve now identified a way to block that inflammation in the short term.”3

Since vaccine effectiveness is reduced in elderly patients, the researchers of this study developed a human experimental system to investigate antigen-specific immunity in which healthy volunteers were challenged intra-dermally to induce antigen-specific responses to viral pathogens, such as varicella zoster (chickenpox) and herpes zoster (shingles) viruses.1 (An antigen is a substance that causes the body to produce an immune response against it and stimulate the production of antibodies.)4

In order to investigate cutaneous (skin) immune responses, the researchers injected an antigen (varicella zoster virus) into the skin of 175 volunteer participants (78 participants were over the age of 65 and 97 were under the age of 40). All volunteers had a prior history of varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection, which causes chicken pox.1

Typically after a person contracts chicken pox, they become immune to VZV infection. However, VZV can also re-activate in old age causing herpes zoster (shingles) if T cell immune responses are not strong enough. (T cells are a type of white blood cell that, along with B cells, determine the specificity of immune responses to antigens in the body.5

During both primary infection and latent virus reactivation, the absence of T-cell immunity results in VZV-induced disease (chicken pox and shingles). Therefore, the researchers considered any observed decrease in skin responsiveness to VZV in elderly patients to be a goods model for investigating decline in immune system function during aging.1

The researchers observed that the older subjects exhibited weaker immune responses because there was less T cell activation and less reddening and swelling of the skin. However, by injecting a benign saline solution into the other arm of each participant, which acted as a control in the study, the researchers discovered that the reduced response was not necessarily due to a lack of resident memory T cells present in the skin.1 6

The results showed that even the saline solution induced an inflammatory response in some of the older participants. Those who had the strongest inflammatory responses to the saline solution had the weakest immune responses to the VZV, suggesting that the excessive inflammation was inhibiting the acquisition of VZV-specific immunity.6

Dr. Akbar states, “Normally inflammation is a healthy part of the body’s immune response, so we were surprised to find that in this case, too much inflammation was getting in the way of the rest of the body’s defenses.”3

Taking Anti-Inflammatory Pills Prior to Vaccination

After analyzing skin biopsies taken post-injection, the researchers concluded that the excessive inflammation induced by the control saline solution was associated with activation of the p38 MAP kinase (MAPK) pathway. To test whether this enzyme was responsible for the inflammation, the researchers conducted a follow-up test with 18 of the over 65-year-old participants, who were given Losmapimod, a drug that inhibits the enzyme in order to reduce acute inflammatory responses.6

Although the drug was designed for and has been tested in clinical trials for long-term use for the treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and arthritis, the participants in the skin inflammation study only took the pill for four days prior to once again being injected with the VZV antigen. This time around, the findings showed that taking Losmapimod did increase the immune responses to the VZV antigen.6

Dr. Milica Vukmanovic-Stejic, lead author of the study stated, “A short-term blockade of the inflammation response opened up a window of opportunity for the immune system to respond effectively.”6

Dr. Veronique Birault, another co-author of the study added, “Vaccine efficacy is known to decline in old age, so we’re hopeful that this novel application of the drug could help make vaccines more effective in older people.”6

Losmapimod: A Failed Drug Manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline

While there are several safety concerns and unanswered questions regarding the manipulation of the immune system with use of drugs prior to vaccination (also a form of immune system manipulation), the drug Losmapimod, manufactured by GSK, has failed to improve cardiac or COPD outcomes in several clinical trials.

GSK investigated Losmapimod as a therapeutic for post-myocardial infarction (heart attack), but the Phase IIIA clinical trial failed to show significantly improved clinical outcomes. In October 2015, GSK announced cancelling the planned phase IIIB trial, stating it would “evaluate all options for future development.”7

GSK also investigated Losmapimod as a therapeutic drug for COPD but multiple phase II clinical trials failed to show that Losmapimod improves exercise tolerance, lung function, arterial inflammation, endothelial function or rate of COPD exacerbations, even though it appeared to be well tolerated in COPD patients. GSK terminated development of Losmapimod for COPD in 2016.8

In April 2019, Fulcrum Therapeutics acquired the global rights to Losmapimod from GSK initiating a clinical trial of Losmapimod to evaluate its efficacy in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD).8


1 Vukmanovic-Stejic M et al. Enhancement of cutaneous immunity during aging by blocking p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase–induced inflammation. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology September 2018; 142(3): 844-856.
2 Raines K. Flu Shots Rarely Work for People Over Age 65. The Vaccine Reaction Dec. 18, 2015.
3 Study indicates that blocking inflammation may improve vaccine efficiency in elderly patients. European Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Jan. 23, 2018.
Definition of antigen. Medline Plus Medical Encyclopedia July 31, 2019.
5 Rogers K. T Cell. Encyclopedia Britannica.
6 University College of London. Improving vaccines for the elderly by blocking inflammation. Science Daily Jan. 22, 2018.
7 GSK provides update on LATITUDE-TIMI 60 (losmapimod cardiovascular study). GlaxoSmithKline Oct. 27, 2015.
8 Keown A. GlaxoSmithKline Terminates Development of Losmapimod for COPD. BioSpace Oct. 26, 2016.
PBR Staff. Fulcrum acquires global rights of investigational drug losmapimod from GSK. Pharmaceutical Business Review Apr. 24, 2019.

2 Responses

  1. Where to start with this one… It’s no surprise the medical system is such a disaster when people involved in it can’t make simple logical connections.

    So they say elderly immune systems don’t work well. If vaccines actually worked as they are supposed to, they only ‘train’ the immune system to fight off an infection quicker. So how would this help someone with an ineffective immune system? Of course the reality is that the last thing someone with a weakened immune system needs is to be shot up with inflammatory poisons like aluminum.

    So the super-toxic, super-inflammatory aluminum etc in the vaccine didn’t provoke an inflammatory response but simple saline did? Hmm.

    So too much inflammation is causing the vaccines to not be effective in the elderly? When vaccines themselves cause long-term chronic systemic inflammation by design… What? So they need a new toxic drug to suppress the immune system response (inflammation). But the vaccine ‘works’ by causing an inflammatory immune system response. It’s too early in the day to try to untangle the lunatic thinking behind this article. I guess these scientists are getting grant money for this, so that’s what matters.

  2. What is next? It seems that a vaccine is needed to combat vaccines it will be the next project after all i read an article saying they are trying to make an anti inflammatory vaccine i wonder how they will manage that…….but i think it is easier to just not use the damn useless toxin loaded junk. How can you sit there and complain about something that you make the vaccines do in the first place. The cognitive dissonance are strong with this lot!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search in Archive