So, unfortunately, I think one of the problems with medical training is they’re not actually training doctors to be critical thinkers but to sort of accept whatever is the wisdom of the day. So then, you want to look at where does the wisdom of the day come from, and you think all the doctors are probably reading medical journals and looking at the methodology section and the data… That doesn’t happen. They’re lucky if they glanced at the abstracts. So often, the abstracts are spun, they’re not actually consistent with what’s in the data.
If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.
8 Responses
These doctors, even if it’s on their own dime, also need to take nutrition courses. Joe Mercola and David Brownstein did and so did most of the orthomolecular and functional medical doctors. After this C19 fiasco, I will never go to a doctor who doesn’t know nutrition, at least somewhat. As they say, if you use nutrition for health, you don’t need medicine.
One must also remember that Medical Doctors are not generally selected for entry into medical school based on their ability to question authority, think independently or venture “outside the box.” It is a fair assessment that future doctors improve their admission chances by straying in line, competing with (and sometimes sabotaging) their peers, getting high marks in courses that ask them to unquestioningly memorize “facts” and regurgitate that information for exams. High GPA’s are a must, as are performances on standardized exams. So, we already have a population of doctors who were selected because they demonstrate high levels of compliance with medical authority. This is not the crowd that is likely to question the narrative.
Thank you for your frank and honest assessment of a growing problem in the medical industry
Dr Whitmont, what would you say about the role of what are considered accepted treatment protocols that heavily lean towards Pharma solutions when it comes to such things as malpractice insurance? It seems like that would be a big driver in keeping doctors coloring within official established lines. Also hospitals might also be afraid of litigation for allowing doctors to actually have a place in patient health and wellness if it strayed out of the box imposed by organizations such as the AMA as well as the gov watchdog agencies.
Agree.
Physicians will soon be redundant since A.I. already does a better job of diagnosis than most physicians. Since treatment protocols tied to diagnosis have become compulsory, and every one with the same diagnosis is treated alike (one-size-fits-all), there is no need for physicians who simply comply with bureaucratic imperatives.
I’ve been noticing this for YEARS. It also partially explains why so many doctors end up “Googling” symptoms during an office visit: they have no more of an idea of what’s going on than we as patients do (often times even less). It’s unfortunate. Don’t look for the cause, just prescribe drugs to mask the symptoms. I’ve gotten to the point that I research beforehand and go in with a list of possible causes. Yeah, they hate that, but 9 times out of 10 I’m right. What else are ya gonna do?
For anyone who is interested in how God describes this process in the Bible, Proverbs 1:8-16 says it like this:
“My son, if sinners entice you,
Do not consent.
If they say, “Come with us,
Let’s lie in wait for blood,
Let’s ambush the innocent without cause;
Let’s swallow them alive like Sheol,
Even whole, like those who go down to the pit;
We will find all kinds of precious wealth,
We will fill our houses with plunder;
Throw in your lot with us;
We will all have one money bag,”
My son, do not walk on the way with them.
Keep your feet from their path,
For their feet run to evil,
And they are quick to shed blood.”